blaming a whole race for your own problems is lazy at best, evil at worst. for some reason it has been okay to be evil towards white people for a few years now.
At no point in my life, growing up in almost exclusively white areas in the '80s and '90s, were we ever taught that any of our problems were caused by other groups.
However, we were taught that white people had been a huge source of problems for other groups.
At no point ... were we ever taught that any of our problems were caused by other groups.
this is because when a White ethnicity did this back in the 30s it caused a minor stir. groups do cause problems sometimes. the push-back to the false premise of "Whites are causing all the problems" isn't "actually nobody is causing any problems", it's "wait, if it's not Whites, who is actually causing all the problems?"
blaming a whole race for your own problems is lazy at best, evil at worst.
Can you honestly not conceive of a single valid hypothetical in which one ethnic/racial demographic of people generates an existential threat for another? It doesn’t have to be Jews or whites or anyone specifically, but to suggest that it’s simply not possible is ludicrous.
Cameroon's Paul Biya has been in office since 1979; Uganda's Yoweri Museveni has been in office since 1986. Togo's Gnassingbe family (father, then son) have been in power since 1967.
Being in power since 1994 isn't that impressive. Belarus' Lukashenko also came to power in 1994. Azerbaijan's Aliyev family (father, then son) have been in power since 1993. Even with all the so-called democratization in the late 1980s and 1990s and the resultant End of History, viz. the conclusive triumph of liberal democracy over all other political systems, there are numerous countries where leaders have and will continue to hang on for a long time.
And there will be more to come. Egypt's el-Sisi hasn't been there that long, but he'll probably still be there for decades to come. Same with Chad's Mahamat Deby. Some of those recent coup leaders in West Africa—Doumbouya, Goita, Tchiani, Traore—could also conceivably be in power for decades to come, even though their countries all looked to be developing multi-party electoral systems in the 2010s.
There has been a lot of what liberal democrats call 'democratic backsliding' in the Africa of the 2010s and 2020s compared to the Africa of the 1990s and 2000s. Though this form of government doesn't look to me to be seriously threatened outside of Africa, I think that it's too soon to declare the End of History thesis either verified or falsified.
maybe in a balkanized world, but even then the threat comes from outsiders more than it does from people of other races.
The developed world is now intermingled and well traveled, to the point where racism is now a form of infighting as opposed to outfighting like it was in the old days.
blaming a whole race for your own problems is lazy at best, evil at worst. for some reason it has been okay to be evil towards white people for a few years now.
At no point in my life, growing up in almost exclusively white areas in the '80s and '90s, were we ever taught that any of our problems were caused by other groups.
However, we were taught that white people had been a huge source of problems for other groups.
this is because when a White ethnicity did this back in the 30s it caused a minor stir. groups do cause problems sometimes. the push-back to the false premise of "Whites are causing all the problems" isn't "actually nobody is causing any problems", it's "wait, if it's not Whites, who is actually causing all the problems?"
Can you honestly not conceive of a single valid hypothetical in which one ethnic/racial demographic of people generates an existential threat for another? It doesn’t have to be Jews or whites or anyone specifically, but to suggest that it’s simply not possible is ludicrous.
Like back when the Hutu caused a bunch of problems for the Tutsis back in the 90s.
It's pretty nutty that the Tutsi rebel leader who eventually won the Rwandan Civil War in 1994, Paul Kagame, is still President in 2025.
For the record, Kagame led the Tutsi rebel forces that defeated the French-backed Hutu genociders in the sitting government.
Cameroon's Paul Biya has been in office since 1979; Uganda's Yoweri Museveni has been in office since 1986. Togo's Gnassingbe family (father, then son) have been in power since 1967.
Being in power since 1994 isn't that impressive. Belarus' Lukashenko also came to power in 1994. Azerbaijan's Aliyev family (father, then son) have been in power since 1993. Even with all the so-called democratization in the late 1980s and 1990s and the resultant End of History, viz. the conclusive triumph of liberal democracy over all other political systems, there are numerous countries where leaders have and will continue to hang on for a long time.
And there will be more to come. Egypt's el-Sisi hasn't been there that long, but he'll probably still be there for decades to come. Same with Chad's Mahamat Deby. Some of those recent coup leaders in West Africa—Doumbouya, Goita, Tchiani, Traore—could also conceivably be in power for decades to come, even though their countries all looked to be developing multi-party electoral systems in the 2010s.
There has been a lot of what liberal democrats call 'democratic backsliding' in the Africa of the 2010s and 2020s compared to the Africa of the 1990s and 2000s. Though this form of government doesn't look to me to be seriously threatened outside of Africa, I think that it's too soon to declare the End of History thesis either verified or falsified.
despite
maybe in a balkanized world, but even then the threat comes from outsiders more than it does from people of other races.
The developed world is now intermingled and well traveled, to the point where racism is now a form of infighting as opposed to outfighting like it was in the old days.
Laughs bitterly in German.
"Winners write the history books."
What war did Whites lose?
Who the fuck is downvoting this comment. From a principled standpoint this should be a common belief lol