Telia has really figured it out. A guy born in 1975 had multiple boyfriends who died between 1942 and 1945. Apparently, he was dating men when he was -30 years old.
I mean, when you're that stupid, it's really no wonder that you are a Nazi.
Was his partner 10 years ago ;)
I mean he himself said about Henry that he knows married men who changed their sexuality. To himself that pic wouldnt be proof.
Telia has really figured it out. A guy born in 1975 had multiple boyfriends who died between 1942 and 1945. Apparently, he was dating men when he was -30 years old.
I mean, when you're that stupid, it's really no wonder that you are a Nazi.
Shut the fuck up fag . Also he said "partner's family" Not partner. Who is the stupid one who can't read? No wonder you are a jidf.
you BOTH are jdf
Well, that escalated quickly.
Actually, he said "partners family".
And this is "his partner".
Turns out, you're wrong, as always.
Why, me. I never claimed to be able to read.
Just admit you're the idiot that didn't read what he said instead of arguing ok?
You new here? Textbook pilpul.
Wait, did you just ignore the last paragraph in my post? I guess you're an idiot who didn't read.
And I shouldn't point out to you that he has a wife, and thus is not a 'fag'? Is that your argument?
Was his partner 10 years ago ;)
I mean he himself said about Henry that he knows married men who changed their sexuality. To himself that pic wouldnt be proof.
Don't we all know of men who troon out or go homosexual at age 50 or so, after being married?
It isn't proof (which establishes something with certainty). It's just evidence.
And yet you read his sentence perfectly. Unless you use text to speech like some kind of subhuman worm fit only for a eugenics experiment.
It wasn't that confusing.
Like?