The trannies are having a nuclear meltdown over Trump putting an end to their nonsense. It's glorious.

a woman is someone who identifies as a woman and in order to identify as a woman, one must be a woman and therefore a woman is someone who identifies as a woman and in order to identify as a woman, one must be a woman and therefore a woman is someone who identifies as a woman and in order to identify as a woman, one must be a woman and therefore a woman is someone who identifies as a woman and in order to identify as a woman, one must be a woman and therefore a woman is someone who identifies as a woman and in order to identify as a woman, one must be a woman and therefore a woman is someone who identifies as a woman and in order to identify as a woman, one must be a woman and therefore a woman is someone who identifies as a woman and in order to identify as a woman, one must be a woman and therefore a woman is someone who identifies as a woman and in order to identify as a woman, one must be a woman and therefore a woman is someone who identifies as a woman and in order to identify as a woman, one must be a woman and therefore a woman is someone who identifies as a woman and in order to identify as a woman, one must be a woman and therefore ...

I actually don't much like this counter argument to their nonsense. Walsh is wrong, Knowles is right. A man is more than xy chromosomes, and we intuitively know this when we critique people for not being 'manly'. It is responsibility to family and God, power used responsibly, self-control, self sufficiency, a degree of stoicism*...

There are many men not worthy of the title.

And so there is a degree of 'social construction, informed by biology and our natures' to it.

Don't be misled by the left into taking the complete opposite position of everything they say and do, sometimes the truth is somewhere else. But they want to create a dialectic where there are only two wrong competing answers, xy and xx vs their socially constructed model. The truth is that biologically it's xy and xx (ignoring genetic illness) that then results in natures that inform cultural norms, something socially constructed, but not their social construct.