[Malcolm X] discussed in various speeches how Jews were running many of the businesses that were detrimental to Black People.
Contrary to popular black belief, people running businesses isn't "detrimental to Black [sic] people". Or are you also going to proclaim that the Rooftop Koreans were exploiting blacks?
MLK had a Jewish Handler known as Stanley Levinson. There are rumors that Levinson even wrote some of his speeches.
Handler? Rumors? LOL. The woke right really is retarded.
And even today, the Jews still have their puppets selling out Black folks for money like Al Sharpton.
Is that the same Al Sharpton who incited deadly riots against Jews based on lies?
From my understanding it likely means money lenders and landlords, in places like NY. Yeah, a lot were shit.
As far as I understand it, many blacks are angry at people running businesses in black communities, like bodegas and stores, because these supposedly exploit the black community and take up the space for black businesses. The word 'businesses' would suggest that, rather than money lenders and landlords.
Not you too antonio? You, dev, Lindsey and Triggernometry
That's where I got it. I don't agree with how broadly they use it, but there are some seriously nutty people in the online right. There was someone here, RaceCreatesCulture, who unironically argued that white women should be raped by minorities.
He was a ghostwriter, even the nyt admits it: https://archive.is/Ykfga . wikipedia too, crediting him as a co-writer of the dream speech.
That is not a 'handler'. Though I suppose it's a good thing, because no one takes seriously someone who claims that MLK had a 'Jewish handler'.
From a purely PR perspective that is a monumental embarrassment of a phrase, you're using the exclusive language of two groups you're denigrating to insult them. Everyone outside of those groups has been cringing every time someone says "woke [anything]" for like the past five years so it's a phrase that is either incredibly out of touch, or is engineered to annoy basically everyone to further some martyr complex.
As far as I understand it, many blacks are angry at people running businesses in black communities, like bodegas and stores, because these supposedly exploit the black community and take up the space for black businesses
As I recall it the supposed exploitation was buying up the only general store in the area and hiking up prices on basic goods so that buying a loaf of bread in a black neighborhood was considerably more than outside, and also accusations of using shared blacklists between businesses as a means of blackmailing community members with withholding access to basic necessities. Now everyone there's an incredibly unreliable narrator, and it's arguable the the increased costs of running a store in a black neighborhood maybe even justified the extra premium, but at the very least their stated reasoning wasn't just simply "we're exploited because they're not black".
Their proposed solution to the problem was black business owners, but that's because the black community is infested with the idea of "we dindu nuffin" and the idea of a black business owner ever exploiting people was simply impossible to them, so black store owners would fix everything.
Using the phrase “woke right” is on par with calling everyone who disagrees with you a leftist (Gitz), a stormfag (Imp), or a snowflake. They all mean the same thing coming from a “conservative”: insufficiently philosemitic.
As I recall it the supposed exploitation was buying up the only general store in the area and hiking up prices on basic goods so that buying a loaf of bread in a black neighborhood was considerably more than outside,
That's not a thing though. The reasons for why a loaf of bread is more expensive in a black neighborhood are well-known. As Sowell said, the mark-ups are higher, but the profits aren't. As you say later on.
at the very least their stated reasoning wasn't just simply "we're exploited because they're not black".
No, not just. But that's definitely part of it. And there's a good reason people they regard as 'outsiders' are often targeted. I don't think they would be torching black businesses for high mark-ups, for example. Maybe in a 'racial justice' protest.
I don't remember RCC saying women should be raped, but rather he didn't believe in protecting any woman who wasn't having sex with him. Still an incredibly selfish position, but not quite the same.
people running businesses isn't "detrimental to Black [sic] people"
Look up abortion clinic neighborhood statistics and then come back. Sure, people running businesses isn't detrimental in the surface, but some businesses are detrimental and they have people running them.
Woke right
If questioning jewish people and their actions was woke, then nobody in the media would've glommed onto it the way they did. It's a stupid phrase patently designed to be absurd.
Look up abortion clinic neighborhood statistics and then come back.
Malcolm X was assassinated long before there was such a thing as an abortion clinic.
Abortion is a great thing for blacks. Do you really look at the US black community and imagine that things would be much better if they had 100% more fatherless children?
If questioning jewish people and their actions was woke,
Who told you to not 'question' Jewish people? I told you not to be a retard, that's all.
Why would you willingly link yourself to retarded grifters? There's got to be a better way to make your argument.
The people pushing the 'woke right' narrative are the type who condemn anti-Zionist Jews as Nazis, for example. They're using the same stupid playbook, and they're the same stupid leftists.
They hate the "woke right" pretty much exclusively because the "woke right" isn't a fan of Israel. That's it. So they smear them as racists and Nazis...sound familiar?
Is that the same Al Sharpton who incited deadly riots against Jews based on lies?
Blowback is a thing, in all situations. Someone tries to manipulate a group, prop them up, and it might work for a while, but then they turn on you. Not even saying that's what happened, for the record, but just because someone turned on Group X (in this case, Jews), doesn't mean they weren't run by Group X. It's just not a solid argument.
The people pushing the 'woke right' narrative are the type who condemn anti-Zionist Jews as Nazis
I haven't seen that. I have seen some stuff that I don't agree with, like condemning Tucker Carlson.
Blowback is a thing, in all situations. Someone tries to manipulate a group, prop them up, and it might work for a while, but then they turn on you. Not even saying that's what happened, for the record, but just because someone turned on Group X (in this case, Jews), doesn't mean they weren't run by Group X. It's just not a solid argument.
The order wouldn't make sense, even if I accept all of this arguendo. Blowback comes after the manipulation. This guy claimed that Al Sharpton is a Jewish agent right now. That would mean that the manipulation now caused blowback in the past.
I haven't seen that. I have seen some stuff that I don't agree with, like condemning Tucker Carlson.
The "woke right" attackers are lumping everyone in, and are basically just less upfront neocons. Don't have a problem with Russia? Woke right! Want to stop sending money everywhere? Woke right! Criticize Israel? Woke right! Don't want massive legal immigration? Woke right! You get the point.
The order wouldn't make sense...Blowback comes after the manipulation. This guy claimed that Al Sharpton is a Jewish agent right now...
The US is currently funding Al Qaeda. Sense has nothing to do with it. And division is useful.
The "woke right" attackers are lumping everyone in, and are basically just less upfront neocons
I don't think James Lindsay is a neocon. I don't even get the impression that he cares about Israel that much. He just overreacted to Tucker's interview with that amateur historian who wasn't very good, and who made some highly dubious assertions as well as accurate ones that they spun.
Don't have a problem with Russia? Woke right! Want to stop sending money everywhere? Woke right! Criticize Israel? Woke right! Don't want massive legal immigration? Woke right! You get the point.
The Russia and Israel thing may be the case for Konstantin Kissin, who has a serious case of Russia Derangement Syndrome, but not Lindsay - though as I say, he goes too far.
At any rate, I'm not a champion of this word. I just used it as a synonym for 'Stormfag'.
The US is currently funding Al Qaeda. Sense has nothing to do with it. And division is useful.
Right, but it's not 'blowback' if it comes before supposed manipulation. Point is, Al Sharpton is not a 'Jewish agent'. He's just a moron grifter.
Contrary to popular black belief, people running businesses isn't "detrimental to Black [sic] people". Or are you also going to proclaim that the Rooftop Koreans were exploiting blacks?
Handler? Rumors? LOL. The woke right really is retarded.
Is that the same Al Sharpton who incited deadly riots against Jews based on lies?
People will believe literally anything.
From my understanding it likely means money lenders and landlords, in places like NY. Yeah, a lot were shit.
Not you too antonio? You, dev, Lindsey and Triggernometry
He was a ghostwriter, even the nyt admits it: https://archive.is/Ykfga . wikipedia too, crediting him as a co-writer of the dream speech.
Tony's always been a leftist in denial. It's disappointing but not surprising.
As far as I understand it, many blacks are angry at people running businesses in black communities, like bodegas and stores, because these supposedly exploit the black community and take up the space for black businesses. The word 'businesses' would suggest that, rather than money lenders and landlords.
That's where I got it. I don't agree with how broadly they use it, but there are some seriously nutty people in the online right. There was someone here, RaceCreatesCulture, who unironically argued that white women should be raped by minorities.
That is not a 'handler'. Though I suppose it's a good thing, because no one takes seriously someone who claims that MLK had a 'Jewish handler'.
From a purely PR perspective that is a monumental embarrassment of a phrase, you're using the exclusive language of two groups you're denigrating to insult them. Everyone outside of those groups has been cringing every time someone says "woke [anything]" for like the past five years so it's a phrase that is either incredibly out of touch, or is engineered to annoy basically everyone to further some martyr complex.
As I recall it the supposed exploitation was buying up the only general store in the area and hiking up prices on basic goods so that buying a loaf of bread in a black neighborhood was considerably more than outside, and also accusations of using shared blacklists between businesses as a means of blackmailing community members with withholding access to basic necessities. Now everyone there's an incredibly unreliable narrator, and it's arguable the the increased costs of running a store in a black neighborhood maybe even justified the extra premium, but at the very least their stated reasoning wasn't just simply "we're exploited because they're not black".
Their proposed solution to the problem was black business owners, but that's because the black community is infested with the idea of "we dindu nuffin" and the idea of a black business owner ever exploiting people was simply impossible to them, so black store owners would fix everything.
Using the phrase “woke right” is on par with calling everyone who disagrees with you a leftist (Gitz), a stormfag (Imp), or a snowflake. They all mean the same thing coming from a “conservative”: insufficiently philosemitic.
That's not a thing though. The reasons for why a loaf of bread is more expensive in a black neighborhood are well-known. As Sowell said, the mark-ups are higher, but the profits aren't. As you say later on.
No, not just. But that's definitely part of it. And there's a good reason people they regard as 'outsiders' are often targeted. I don't think they would be torching black businesses for high mark-ups, for example. Maybe in a 'racial justice' protest.
Did you think woke = nutty? It means politically correct. It makes no sense when it’s used like this.
The woke blame everything on ze evil white men. The woke right blame everything on...
That said, I don't generally favor that term because it might harm the fight against the woke.
I don't remember RCC saying women should be raped, but rather he didn't believe in protecting any woman who wasn't having sex with him. Still an incredibly selfish position, but not quite the same.
Might have been a different thread or comment, because I remember the comment you cite as well.
Look up abortion clinic neighborhood statistics and then come back. Sure, people running businesses isn't detrimental in the surface, but some businesses are detrimental and they have people running them.
If questioning jewish people and their actions was woke, then nobody in the media would've glommed onto it the way they did. It's a stupid phrase patently designed to be absurd.
It’s extremely ineffective and lazy rhetoric that really calls into question “muh verbal IQ” lol
Who told you to not 'question' Jewish people? I told you not to be a retard, that's all.
Oh no.
Why would you willingly link yourself to retarded grifters? There's got to be a better way to make your argument.
The people pushing the 'woke right' narrative are the type who condemn anti-Zionist Jews as Nazis, for example. They're using the same stupid playbook, and they're the same stupid leftists.
They hate the "woke right" pretty much exclusively because the "woke right" isn't a fan of Israel. That's it. So they smear them as racists and Nazis...sound familiar?
Blowback is a thing, in all situations. Someone tries to manipulate a group, prop them up, and it might work for a while, but then they turn on you. Not even saying that's what happened, for the record, but just because someone turned on Group X (in this case, Jews), doesn't mean they weren't run by Group X. It's just not a solid argument.
I haven't seen that. I have seen some stuff that I don't agree with, like condemning Tucker Carlson.
The order wouldn't make sense, even if I accept all of this arguendo. Blowback comes after the manipulation. This guy claimed that Al Sharpton is a Jewish agent right now. That would mean that the manipulation now caused blowback in the past.
The "woke right" attackers are lumping everyone in, and are basically just less upfront neocons. Don't have a problem with Russia? Woke right! Want to stop sending money everywhere? Woke right! Criticize Israel? Woke right! Don't want massive legal immigration? Woke right! You get the point.
The US is currently funding Al Qaeda. Sense has nothing to do with it. And division is useful.
I don't think James Lindsay is a neocon. I don't even get the impression that he cares about Israel that much. He just overreacted to Tucker's interview with that amateur historian who wasn't very good, and who made some highly dubious assertions as well as accurate ones that they spun.
The Russia and Israel thing may be the case for Konstantin Kissin, who has a serious case of Russia Derangement Syndrome, but not Lindsay - though as I say, he goes too far.
At any rate, I'm not a champion of this word. I just used it as a synonym for 'Stormfag'.
Right, but it's not 'blowback' if it comes before supposed manipulation. Point is, Al Sharpton is not a 'Jewish agent'. He's just a moron grifter.
I think the hurr durr jew are responsible for all evils in the world crowd are stupid too, but let's not use the term "woke right"
It just makes you sound retarded.