It really is a lazy insult. It's like when leftists tried to use cuck as an insult and it almost never worked the same way. Because that's all you're trying to do. You're trying to appropriate a label that has been successfully applied to a group and utilise it for another unrelated group and praying it receives success as a result. It's not only incorrect usage, it's incredibly lazy because you can't get your own labels to work. So you use already successful ones in the wrong way.
It's like when leftists tried to use cuck as an insult and it almost never worked the same way
It's not like that at all. They can't use the word 'cuck' because they are the cucks. If you want to use an example, maybe use people on the right who call leftists 'the real racists'. That indeed never works, because they own racism. Similarly, the Stormfags can engage in any sort of IDPol without being woke.
You're trying to appropriate a label that has been successfully applied to a group and utilise it for another unrelated group
It's absolutely like that. Even now, you brought up the exact same type of example, where one side tries to use the language of the other side because they see success of said other side using it. It doesn't matter what the term is, so long as it's used by an opposing side.
Unrelated? I just showed you.
Preceded by...
Similarly, the Stormfags can engage in any sort of IDPol without being woke.
Your relation that you provided was literally just an overlap in the usage of IdPol. It's fucking hilarious then for you to say that the usage of IdPol wouldn't necessarily be woke if it's done by StormFags.
You're grasping at straws, Tony. All you do by using that language is essentially signal to others where you stand. Might as well unironically use "chud", since that is just as forced of a term.
Even now, you brought up the exact same type of example, where one side tries to use the language of the other side because they see success of said other side using it.
And they may even be right. The left is racist. But it doesn't work, because they own the issue. Apparently some sort of a "only Nixon can go to China" thing. Same for Stormfags. They pose as being anti-woke, so they can be remarkably similar to the woke without being called out for it.
Your relation that you provided was literally just an overlap in the usage of IdPol. It's fucking hilarious then for you to say that the usage of IdPol wouldn't necessarily be woke if it's done by StormFags.
Hardly. See the above.
All you do by using that language is essentially signal to others where you stand. Might as well unironically use "chud",
The woke blame everything on ze evil white men. The woke right blame everything on...
That said, I don't generally favor that term because it might harm the fight against the woke.
Wow, way to avoid the point.
It really is a lazy insult. It's like when leftists tried to use cuck as an insult and it almost never worked the same way. Because that's all you're trying to do. You're trying to appropriate a label that has been successfully applied to a group and utilise it for another unrelated group and praying it receives success as a result. It's not only incorrect usage, it's incredibly lazy because you can't get your own labels to work. So you use already successful ones in the wrong way.
It's not like that at all. They can't use the word 'cuck' because they are the cucks. If you want to use an example, maybe use people on the right who call leftists 'the real racists'. That indeed never works, because they own racism. Similarly, the Stormfags can engage in any sort of IDPol without being woke.
Unrelated? I just showed you.
It's absolutely like that. Even now, you brought up the exact same type of example, where one side tries to use the language of the other side because they see success of said other side using it. It doesn't matter what the term is, so long as it's used by an opposing side.
Preceded by...
Your relation that you provided was literally just an overlap in the usage of IdPol. It's fucking hilarious then for you to say that the usage of IdPol wouldn't necessarily be woke if it's done by StormFags.
You're grasping at straws, Tony. All you do by using that language is essentially signal to others where you stand. Might as well unironically use "chud", since that is just as forced of a term.
And they may even be right. The left is racist. But it doesn't work, because they own the issue. Apparently some sort of a "only Nixon can go to China" thing. Same for Stormfags. They pose as being anti-woke, so they can be remarkably similar to the woke without being called out for it.
Hardly. See the above.
So to be clear, you're claiming that I'm Antifa?