Why would you willingly link yourself to retarded grifters? There's got to be a better way to make your argument.
The people pushing the 'woke right' narrative are the type who condemn anti-Zionist Jews as Nazis, for example. They're using the same stupid playbook, and they're the same stupid leftists.
They hate the "woke right" pretty much exclusively because the "woke right" isn't a fan of Israel. That's it. So they smear them as racists and Nazis...sound familiar?
Is that the same Al Sharpton who incited deadly riots against Jews based on lies?
Blowback is a thing, in all situations. Someone tries to manipulate a group, prop them up, and it might work for a while, but then they turn on you. Not even saying that's what happened, for the record, but just because someone turned on Group X (in this case, Jews), doesn't mean they weren't run by Group X. It's just not a solid argument.
The people pushing the 'woke right' narrative are the type who condemn anti-Zionist Jews as Nazis
I haven't seen that. I have seen some stuff that I don't agree with, like condemning Tucker Carlson.
Blowback is a thing, in all situations. Someone tries to manipulate a group, prop them up, and it might work for a while, but then they turn on you. Not even saying that's what happened, for the record, but just because someone turned on Group X (in this case, Jews), doesn't mean they weren't run by Group X. It's just not a solid argument.
The order wouldn't make sense, even if I accept all of this arguendo. Blowback comes after the manipulation. This guy claimed that Al Sharpton is a Jewish agent right now. That would mean that the manipulation now caused blowback in the past.
I haven't seen that. I have seen some stuff that I don't agree with, like condemning Tucker Carlson.
The "woke right" attackers are lumping everyone in, and are basically just less upfront neocons. Don't have a problem with Russia? Woke right! Want to stop sending money everywhere? Woke right! Criticize Israel? Woke right! Don't want massive legal immigration? Woke right! You get the point.
The order wouldn't make sense...Blowback comes after the manipulation. This guy claimed that Al Sharpton is a Jewish agent right now...
The US is currently funding Al Qaeda. Sense has nothing to do with it. And division is useful.
The "woke right" attackers are lumping everyone in, and are basically just less upfront neocons
I don't think James Lindsay is a neocon. I don't even get the impression that he cares about Israel that much. He just overreacted to Tucker's interview with that amateur historian who wasn't very good, and who made some highly dubious assertions as well as accurate ones that they spun.
Don't have a problem with Russia? Woke right! Want to stop sending money everywhere? Woke right! Criticize Israel? Woke right! Don't want massive legal immigration? Woke right! You get the point.
The Russia and Israel thing may be the case for Konstantin Kissin, who has a serious case of Russia Derangement Syndrome, but not Lindsay - though as I say, he goes too far.
At any rate, I'm not a champion of this word. I just used it as a synonym for 'Stormfag'.
The US is currently funding Al Qaeda. Sense has nothing to do with it. And division is useful.
Right, but it's not 'blowback' if it comes before supposed manipulation. Point is, Al Sharpton is not a 'Jewish agent'. He's just a moron grifter.
Also, I have almost never seen anyone who smears someone as "woke right" or "stormfag" win an argument. People who are trying to pull off that tactic should probably think about better ways of getting their point across.
Right, but it's not 'blowback' if it comes before supposed manipulation. Point is, Al Sharpton is not a 'Jewish agent'. He's just a moron grifter.
Call it whatever you want; it's possible - and happens - that an organization or group actively funds another group that calls for the death of the funders.
I'm just calling out the logic; again, not saying Sharpton is a Jewish agent, just that your argument doesn't do anything to disprove the idea.
Oh no.
Why would you willingly link yourself to retarded grifters? There's got to be a better way to make your argument.
The people pushing the 'woke right' narrative are the type who condemn anti-Zionist Jews as Nazis, for example. They're using the same stupid playbook, and they're the same stupid leftists.
They hate the "woke right" pretty much exclusively because the "woke right" isn't a fan of Israel. That's it. So they smear them as racists and Nazis...sound familiar?
Blowback is a thing, in all situations. Someone tries to manipulate a group, prop them up, and it might work for a while, but then they turn on you. Not even saying that's what happened, for the record, but just because someone turned on Group X (in this case, Jews), doesn't mean they weren't run by Group X. It's just not a solid argument.
I haven't seen that. I have seen some stuff that I don't agree with, like condemning Tucker Carlson.
The order wouldn't make sense, even if I accept all of this arguendo. Blowback comes after the manipulation. This guy claimed that Al Sharpton is a Jewish agent right now. That would mean that the manipulation now caused blowback in the past.
The "woke right" attackers are lumping everyone in, and are basically just less upfront neocons. Don't have a problem with Russia? Woke right! Want to stop sending money everywhere? Woke right! Criticize Israel? Woke right! Don't want massive legal immigration? Woke right! You get the point.
The US is currently funding Al Qaeda. Sense has nothing to do with it. And division is useful.
I don't think James Lindsay is a neocon. I don't even get the impression that he cares about Israel that much. He just overreacted to Tucker's interview with that amateur historian who wasn't very good, and who made some highly dubious assertions as well as accurate ones that they spun.
The Russia and Israel thing may be the case for Konstantin Kissin, who has a serious case of Russia Derangement Syndrome, but not Lindsay - though as I say, he goes too far.
At any rate, I'm not a champion of this word. I just used it as a synonym for 'Stormfag'.
Right, but it's not 'blowback' if it comes before supposed manipulation. Point is, Al Sharpton is not a 'Jewish agent'. He's just a moron grifter.
Why not just say that, then?
Also, I have almost never seen anyone who smears someone as "woke right" or "stormfag" win an argument. People who are trying to pull off that tactic should probably think about better ways of getting their point across.
Call it whatever you want; it's possible - and happens - that an organization or group actively funds another group that calls for the death of the funders.
I'm just calling out the logic; again, not saying Sharpton is a Jewish agent, just that your argument doesn't do anything to disprove the idea.