No offense man, but the other guy isn't wrong. If you weren't allowed you wouldn't do it with 2+ topics and dozens of comments daily.
Dom might try to squash it, but throwing yourself an oppression party while you are literally doing the thing you are claiming you aren't allowed to do is Pure Feminist (aka Jewish) nonsense.
We do, but you see how there is a huge difference between "we are not allowed to do X" and "sometimes bans happen randomly for doing X."
Like you see how that's different right. If we weren't allowed to talk shit about Jews, Yoisi there wouldn't be on the front page 5 times a day talking shit about them across a dozen topics. He would have been banned a while ago.
Which makes his little line here come across as very feminine and Jewish in trying to claim victimhood.
I think the truth is more nuanced and the way people describe something is just a more colloquial or general way of
if phrasing it.
If gang bangers roamed my neighborhood and threatened to do something bad to me if I stepped out of line, it'd be fair to say "I'm not allowed to do ____". Yeah, maybe the gang isn't the official law of the land. Maybe they don't catch me everytime I break their rules. Maybe even they occasionally don't enforce those rules for one reason or another (stretched thin, busy, whatever). It doesn't change the fact that the threat is very much real and serious, and that you "aren't allowed".
It is literally the rule that you can't accuse identity groups (jews) of conspiring. Enforcement is another thing.
However, I ought to be able to say some government Jews are conspiring. You know from the evidence. And that's not an entire identity group but some subgroup. Some Jews in Congress and some cucks have been conspiring to pass anti-Semitism anti-Free speech legislation too. It is known. It is directed at the insane "Queers for Palestine" types, but there will be collateral damage per intent.
Rules not evenly enforced are just suggestions and favoritism.
My entire point was that he, specifically, says it literally every day multiple times going back weeks and months. Using heavy words like "not allowed" does not describe the situation in the slightest and reeks of victim seeking.
However, I ought to be able to say some government Jews are conspiring
Nothing I've said has been to the contrary and is often in fact agreeing with such. But a lot of people seem to be unable to separate "you are being a sperg, calm down" from "you are wrong and I only attack people when I think they are wrong."
Rules not evenly enforced are just suggestions and favoritism.
If your point is moderation is uneven, I won't argue with you. But I am not that bothered by it, and I certainly don't want to be the guy rules laywers with trolls, so... I just vote with my feet if I have to.
We are not allowed to say that jews are conspiring here though :D
No offense man, but the other guy isn't wrong. If you weren't allowed you wouldn't do it with 2+ topics and dozens of comments daily.
Dom might try to squash it, but throwing yourself an oppression party while you are literally doing the thing you are claiming you aren't allowed to do is Pure Feminist (aka Jewish) nonsense.
We still have random acts of banning for saying things like Jewish feminists wrote the Japanese post war constitution.
We do, but you see how there is a huge difference between "we are not allowed to do X" and "sometimes bans happen randomly for doing X."
Like you see how that's different right. If we weren't allowed to talk shit about Jews, Yoisi there wouldn't be on the front page 5 times a day talking shit about them across a dozen topics. He would have been banned a while ago.
Which makes his little line here come across as very feminine and Jewish in trying to claim victimhood.
I think the truth is more nuanced and the way people describe something is just a more colloquial or general way of if phrasing it.
If gang bangers roamed my neighborhood and threatened to do something bad to me if I stepped out of line, it'd be fair to say "I'm not allowed to do ____". Yeah, maybe the gang isn't the official law of the land. Maybe they don't catch me everytime I break their rules. Maybe even they occasionally don't enforce those rules for one reason or another (stretched thin, busy, whatever). It doesn't change the fact that the threat is very much real and serious, and that you "aren't allowed".
It is really weird how they act exactly like they claim the jews do. They cry out in pain as they strike you, etc etc.
dom is a worthless cuck faggot and needs to fuck off forever
It is literally the rule that you can't accuse identity groups (jews) of conspiring. Enforcement is another thing.
However, I ought to be able to say some government Jews are conspiring. You know from the evidence. And that's not an entire identity group but some subgroup. Some Jews in Congress and some cucks have been conspiring to pass anti-Semitism anti-Free speech legislation too. It is known. It is directed at the insane "Queers for Palestine" types, but there will be collateral damage per intent.
Rules not evenly enforced are just suggestions and favoritism.
My entire point was that he, specifically, says it literally every day multiple times going back weeks and months. Using heavy words like "not allowed" does not describe the situation in the slightest and reeks of victim seeking.
Nothing I've said has been to the contrary and is often in fact agreeing with such. But a lot of people seem to be unable to separate "you are being a sperg, calm down" from "you are wrong and I only attack people when I think they are wrong."
If your point is moderation is uneven, I won't argue with you. But I am not that bothered by it, and I certainly don't want to be the guy rules laywers with trolls, so... I just vote with my feet if I have to.
That's literally 90% of what you fuckwits do.
Are you from the American government?
Oh nah, it's not that we're saying anything about them, it's that the cultists are openly admitting to doing so. Noticing that is not a crime.
... I think.