they said they had 300 "experts" which they claim are historians and archaeologists work on this. And if what they said is true, then that is more proof that the historian industry is compromised and we shouldn't believe them on anything and we should do our own research.We shouldnt believe anything from mainstream historians especially not anything big like i dont know.... ww2 or something
Archeologist: "The skulls were this shape."
Filmmaker: "What color was their skin and how prominent was the soft tissue?"
Archeologist: "We really can't tell that from the bones."
Filmmaker: "Perfect. We'll credit you as a consultant."
I have a browser add on that replaces words. For news articles I have "experts" replaced with "the homeless crack addict, we found outside our office". Makes them more accurate.
they said they had 300 "experts" which they claim are historians and archaeologists work on this. And if what they said is true, then that is more proof that the historian industry is compromised and we shouldn't believe them on anything and we should do our own research.We shouldnt believe anything from mainstream historians especially not anything big like i dont know.... ww2 or something
🌎👩🚀🔫👩🚀
Archeologist: "The skulls were this shape."
Filmmaker: "What color was their skin and how prominent was the soft tissue?"
Archeologist: "We really can't tell that from the bones."
Filmmaker: "Perfect. We'll credit you as a consultant."
Sadly true.
Isn't it just an amazing historical coincidence that the good guys always win and the bad guys always lose?
I have a browser add on that replaces words. For news articles I have "experts" replaced with "the homeless crack addict, we found outside our office". Makes them more accurate.