You don't even have to dig that deep, social sciences are fucking useless and the heckin' diversity experiments they perform are either useless or counter-productive, but you can't point this out because it's problematic
GRS is modern lobotomy and social sciences are modern Lysenkoism
There was a study from Brown University a few years back that showed if one elementary school child "transitions" then many others follow, much higher than the standard rate. Basically showing it was a social contagion. It was actually released but the alphabet mafia screeched until they retracted it and issued an apology.
I have a book from the 1970s that discusses how this was going on back then and how scientists were scared of losing their jobs if they didn't report the right results so a lot of stuff never got published.
People are just waking up to it because of covid but it has been going on since the beginning. Most of the "science" out there is gamed. Reproducibility is a huge problem in most fields except hard sciences and in hard sciences the problem is often that many people lack the expensive equipment to reproduce even if they wanted to so the data is usually just checked to make sure it makes sense given current theoretical beliefs which means a lot of hard science could be fake too if the theoretical stuff is wrong.
So much of science is a scam. Everything is fake and gay.
Yup. I've only known 2 actual real "scientists" in my life who I would say were exceptionally smart and competent at science. One of them worked in weapons research for South Korea and one of them worked in weapons research for the USA. Of course, what they worked in was never expressively said but that's what anyone would assume given the details.
I have a book from the 1970s that discusses how this was going on back then and how scientists were scared of losing their jobs if they didn't report the right results so a lot of stuff never got published.
Probably became commonplace somewhere post-WWII, as quackery started to finally disappear but other bullshit had to replace it, where pharmaceuticals were becoming the Big Money and nepotism began to take serious hold.
Any soft science, especially ones that require speculation and biases, can probably be thrown in the trash easily.
Believing science that works with the actual, rigorous method depends on how much you're willing to deny observational reality. Some throw quantum physics in the trash, others throw cosmology in the trash. Even then the sci-method path can require decades to get just a "theory" down, and even then it doesn't go beyond "theory", sort of an extension of the Incompleteness Theorems applied to this field.
Look up Domestic Violence Studies. Over the past 50 odd years, there have been hundreds that were suppressed because they didn't perpetuate the desired Narrative.
There is zero reason to wonder how many times it's happened, because it's happened a lot. Which is why I always laugh at people who say that conspiracies can't be true because there would be whistleblowers. The reality is that anything evil enough is too hard for most people to cope with so they instinctively go into denial to avoid coming to terms with it, or there actively are whistleblowers that are then immediately either ignored, called loony, or just taken for granted. Just take a look at Snowden and Assange. We've known of wide-spread corruption for decades, and nobody does anything. Because it's too difficult to accept that they've supported evil people all their lives.
I wonder how many times this has already happened in a variety of differnet Sciences TM. Can't let reality escape into the public now tsk tsk.
Thousands. Just think of how long margarine has been around. They knew from the start that it was dramatically worse for humans than real butter.
Think how long they've been pouring toxic flouride in the water.
You don't even have to dig that deep, social sciences are fucking useless and the heckin' diversity experiments they perform are either useless or counter-productive, but you can't point this out because it's problematic
GRS is modern lobotomy and social sciences are modern Lysenkoism
There was a study from Brown University a few years back that showed if one elementary school child "transitions" then many others follow, much higher than the standard rate. Basically showing it was a social contagion. It was actually released but the alphabet mafia screeched until they retracted it and issued an apology.
I have a book from the 1970s that discusses how this was going on back then and how scientists were scared of losing their jobs if they didn't report the right results so a lot of stuff never got published.
People are just waking up to it because of covid but it has been going on since the beginning. Most of the "science" out there is gamed. Reproducibility is a huge problem in most fields except hard sciences and in hard sciences the problem is often that many people lack the expensive equipment to reproduce even if they wanted to so the data is usually just checked to make sure it makes sense given current theoretical beliefs which means a lot of hard science could be fake too if the theoretical stuff is wrong.
So much of science is a scam. Everything is fake and gay.
That's why people of real talent work on black programs. When you can't publish the only thing anybody cares about is results.
Yup. I've only known 2 actual real "scientists" in my life who I would say were exceptionally smart and competent at science. One of them worked in weapons research for South Korea and one of them worked in weapons research for the USA. Of course, what they worked in was never expressively said but that's what anyone would assume given the details.
What's the book?
10 days late, thank you for your response.
Probably became commonplace somewhere post-WWII, as quackery started to finally disappear but other bullshit had to replace it, where pharmaceuticals were becoming the Big Money and nepotism began to take serious hold.
Any soft science, especially ones that require speculation and biases, can probably be thrown in the trash easily.
Believing science that works with the actual, rigorous method depends on how much you're willing to deny observational reality. Some throw quantum physics in the trash, others throw cosmology in the trash. Even then the sci-method path can require decades to get just a "theory" down, and even then it doesn't go beyond "theory", sort of an extension of the Incompleteness Theorems applied to this field.
Look up Domestic Violence Studies. Over the past 50 odd years, there have been hundreds that were suppressed because they didn't perpetuate the desired Narrative.
There is zero reason to wonder how many times it's happened, because it's happened a lot. Which is why I always laugh at people who say that conspiracies can't be true because there would be whistleblowers. The reality is that anything evil enough is too hard for most people to cope with so they instinctively go into denial to avoid coming to terms with it, or there actively are whistleblowers that are then immediately either ignored, called loony, or just taken for granted. Just take a look at Snowden and Assange. We've known of wide-spread corruption for decades, and nobody does anything. Because it's too difficult to accept that they've supported evil people all their lives.
That and all the studies they agree with have trouble being reproduced.
It's all just a fucking priest class dictating whatever benefits themselves as dogma for the masses to adhere to.