"Why are foreigners more worried than actual Japanese people?"
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Foreigners are most concerned because we've seen our own countries ruined. Most Japanese are still very naive and believe that most immigrants will be high class and respectful as the few that migrated in the past were.
I keep explaining this to Japanese friends and its nice to see how quickly they come around and how some of them are relieved to realise they can speak openly around me.
Is this sincere or gaslighting?
If it's sincere the answer is obvious, we all know where this leads already, it's not a difficult topic to look up.
The Japanese don't know because they haven't seen the consequences of the shit being pushed towards them, asking this maliciously is gaslighting the native pop to question whether they should be questioning the issue in the first place.
Didn't watch the whole video but based on the context and comments in reply I'm guessing it's rhetorical and along the lines of "wake the fuck up samurai we've got a country to save."
Having watch the video, it is a quote from some Japanese people who watched one of their previous videos talking about the problems of these third-world immigrants coming to Japan, but the Japanese government deciding to ignore it. So Japanese people were asking why these foreigners seem to care more about them than their own government.
Globalization is the worse thing to have ever happened to humans. It is gonna destroy thousands of years of history, culture and unique demographics.
Our village was razed. The village in the next valley over must be warned
Exactly.
Being something of a Nietzschean (very very roughly speaking so don't bother with any gotchas) I was surprised to see woke shit start to take root in the Far East. Yes, communism took root there a long time ago, but that's easily explained by Maoism's Legalist roots and the way that Hegelian theory was partly inspired by Far Eastern thinking in the first place. Plus Marxism derides the slave morality of "utopian/moralistic socialism," hence why Soviet and Maoist aesthetics emphasized greatness rather than fairness, and why postmodern art was promoted by the CIA to subvert Soviet culture.
Whereas woke shit is the most vulgar manifestation of slave morality imaginable, so it's hard to understand how something like that could ever take root in Far Eastern cultures. Christianity lionizes the condition of being oppressed, which is an extreme peculiarity that woke shit grows out of, and Jewish morality is fundamentally transactional, stemming as it does from a mercantile culture with the judicial values of Hammurabi.
Maybe the globalists are using different propaganda methods to appeal to Far Eastern countries though. Like say their collectivism, or depicting traditionalism as the pathetic clinging onto of mediocrity, in contrast to Western cultures where globalist propaganda glamourizes mediocrity and places moral authority on victimhood. There are many different ways to sell the same shit policies depending on who the target audience is, Soviet propaganda for instance is ironically more aesthetically appealing to the Western right than it is to the Western left.
Old Soviet propaganda is about working hard and seeing results (even if the end goal is vague or not mentioned - Fallout is pretty good for capturing that); New Soviet Propaganda is about crying harder to get humanity to suck its own dick or whatever the fuck it is they think they want.
It's likely due to the DEI-stock market angle that so readily spread the infestation in less than a decade. Corruption can wreak havoc so much faster and harder when someone waves "free" money in front of corporations who might be experiencing financial setbacks, and when said corporations are infested with investors who are actively buying into said trend.
Then expand those same incentives into government, and media, and you have yourself a full on cultural and economic takeover of multiple countries.
Asians are generally collectivists, and their cultures don't generally encourage going against the grain or individualism (except in rare cases, like the guy who killed the communist politician a while back).
It's very interesting to look at it from that perspective.
Unfortunately, it'll lead to them fucking themselves over.
祖国を護れ！日本万歳！
Yes. 🫡
likely because we have seen the failure of liberal ideology and the damage it does. But the slant eyes bury their head in the sand and pretend like they can get away with it. The poison is already in their tiny, little country and they let it in by closing heir eyes and ears to the lessons we paid for.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - identity Attacks
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
On both blacks and asians.
That’s Stupid.
I wasn’t “attacking” their identities, I was describing common demographic behaviours (which became stereotypes because they’re largely true). Why aren’t you butthurt by what I said about whites and Indians? Whats the rule for free speech violation?
That's how you know it was good. I gave you two upvotes! 🫡
Yes you were, that's why you tied it to inherent criminality. Stop making excuses. For Whites, "saving" people isn't an inherently negative slander. For Indians, they are Asians.
Are they NOT prone to criminality though? Is that NOT reflected in basically every demographic stat available? Do Asians (oriental asians specifically) NOT have a culture of submission to authority and compliance with their rulers’ unhinged tyranny? Is India NOT one of the filthiest countries in the world?
Again, the things I said weren’t meant to “attack” anyone, it was to highlight that every population group has a fatal flaw, and for the japs it’s clearly their fealty to authority, which is why I believe the immigration stuff is going to impact them for a long time. If we’re going to have free speech, we have to be able to say things and point out things that make others butthurt and hit the report button. Or am I supposed to shut my mouth for fear of hurt feelings and someone with the rule book in one hand and their little ban hammer in the other? Wasn’t this site started precisely to end that kind of bullshit?
You have a job to do, and I get that it’s probably not easy having to be this place’s hall monitor and accumulating a ton of down votes and being told to go fuck yourself etc, so I’ll be mature about it and not do that. You say I broke the rules, then that’s that I guess.
I just want to know, (and I mean this sincerely, not making excuses or trying to argue further), how else was I supposed to state this very obvious and demonstrably true thing with it supposedly violating that rule?
Saying “blacks commit crime” (which is true) is a statement of fact. It’s not the same as saying “I hate all black people”.
It’s not an attack to state facts, that’s leftist mentality.
Dom has to protect the Rule 16 people. Your deleted comment is just collateral damage.
You're not saying "blacks commit crime". You're saying that blacks are biologically ingrained to commit crimes. It's no different than saying that "whites are school shooters". I don't think that's true, and it is an intentionally dishonest rhetorical tactic to make a cultural issue into an immutable biological characteristic.
If you wanted to actually talk about statistics or cultural behaviors, you wouldn't recognize them as inherent or immutable.
Aren’t cultural behaviours “inherent” by definition though?
I said “blacks are prone to crime”, not “blacks are genetically predisposed to commit crime”. I was speaking specifically from the cultural point of view. I get that that’s a fine line though, maybe I just worded it like a retard.
Anyways thanks for the feedback, I just wanted to understand so that I don’t make the same mistake again.
No, that would be literally the opposite.