"Why are foreigners more worried than actual Japanese people?"
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
That’s Stupid.
I wasn’t “attacking” their identities, I was describing common demographic behaviours (which became stereotypes because they’re largely true). Why aren’t you butthurt by what I said about whites and Indians? Whats the rule for free speech violation?
That's how you know it was good. I gave you two upvotes! 🫡
Yes you were, that's why you tied it to inherent criminality. Stop making excuses. For Whites, "saving" people isn't an inherently negative slander. For Indians, they are Asians.
Are they NOT prone to criminality though? Is that NOT reflected in basically every demographic stat available? Do Asians (oriental asians specifically) NOT have a culture of submission to authority and compliance with their rulers’ unhinged tyranny? Is India NOT one of the filthiest countries in the world?
Again, the things I said weren’t meant to “attack” anyone, it was to highlight that every population group has a fatal flaw, and for the japs it’s clearly their fealty to authority, which is why I believe the immigration stuff is going to impact them for a long time. If we’re going to have free speech, we have to be able to say things and point out things that make others butthurt and hit the report button. Or am I supposed to shut my mouth for fear of hurt feelings and someone with the rule book in one hand and their little ban hammer in the other? Wasn’t this site started precisely to end that kind of bullshit?
You have a job to do, and I get that it’s probably not easy having to be this place’s hall monitor and accumulating a ton of down votes and being told to go fuck yourself etc, so I’ll be mature about it and not do that. You say I broke the rules, then that’s that I guess.
I just want to know, (and I mean this sincerely, not making excuses or trying to argue further), how else was I supposed to state this very obvious and demonstrably true thing with it supposedly violating that rule?
Saying “blacks commit crime” (which is true) is a statement of fact. It’s not the same as saying “I hate all black people”.
It’s not an attack to state facts, that’s leftist mentality.
Dom has to protect the Rule 16 people. Your deleted comment is just collateral damage.
You're not saying "blacks commit crime". You're saying that blacks are biologically ingrained to commit crimes. It's no different than saying that "whites are school shooters". I don't think that's true, and it is an intentionally dishonest rhetorical tactic to make a cultural issue into an immutable biological characteristic.
If you wanted to actually talk about statistics or cultural behaviors, you wouldn't recognize them as inherent or immutable.
Aren’t cultural behaviours “inherent” by definition though?
I said “blacks are prone to crime”, not “blacks are genetically predisposed to commit crime”. I was speaking specifically from the cultural point of view. I get that that’s a fine line though, maybe I just worded it like a retard.
Anyways thanks for the feedback, I just wanted to understand so that I don’t make the same mistake again.