And normies wonder why the UK military would only last 2 weeks in a war with a tier 2 country when counter terrorism resources are wasted on this.
Heard that last year there was practically ZERO burglaries actually caught, and that the recent prison releases 'accidentally' released people they shouldn't have......just remove your government and go back to monarchy, lords and fiefs again at this point Brits.
Wait how young is William's eldest kid? Maybe we can send him to live with the Gurkas for a while so he can come back with their bloodlust and not taking shit from no-one.
Almost every royal or near-royal line in consideration are terrible choices though. Anyone after the 'Glorious' Revolution (where Parliament broke their oaths to support a foreign invader, William III, in usurping the throne & turning Britain into the second great modern bankocracy after the Netherlands) is guaranteed to be a cuck puppet of globalist powerbrokers. So that rules out the Oranges, Hanovers & Windsors (Saxe-Coburg-Gothas).
While I understand Jacobite sympathies, their current claimant (Franz, Duke of Bavaria) is a German fag (literally). Not a viable choice either.
I think that leaves the Earl of Loudoun, that one Australian dude descended from George the Duke of Clarence. Also a backstabbing fag who deserved to be drowned in wine, but that was in the 15th century, so fine - let the sins of the distant ancestor not burden his descendant.
Alternatively maybe it's time for a new, actually English royal dynasty. The Wake baronets are purported descendants of Hereward the Wake, a famous Anglo-Saxon rebel against Bill the Bastard's tyranny, and have generally been OK guys not up to any globohomo skullduggery AFAIK. That could be interesting, while we're wishcasting for a new non-pozzed royal house.
Prince Ernst August of Hanover is probably your best bet for the throne tbh but he's an investment banker who worked with Islamic banking and whose wikipedia profile has him with a Jewish man.
Your best bet is a military dictatorship where the dictator starts his own monarchy by right of divine providence or something made up like that to sound fancy.
That's why I suggested giving William's kid a few years with the Gurkas
I'd think it'd put the UK on the right path if anytime these emotional manipulator blackmail class try to control the king, he reaches for his sword and says 'you can either get the fuck out of my country or after I pull this out I'll only seethe it when it's coated in blood' lol
Because that doesn't work for everyone, with ALL the US involvement in the middle east, it should've taught the lesson that different parts of the world require different leadership. There is no 'one shoe fits all sizes' like the globalists claim democracy is.
And normies wonder why the UK military would only last 2 weeks in a war with a tier 2 country when counter terrorism resources are wasted on this.
Heard that last year there was practically ZERO burglaries actually caught, and that the recent prison releases 'accidentally' released people they shouldn't have......just remove your government and go back to monarchy, lords and fiefs again at this point Brits.
Cant go back to monarchy. The royal family is cucked beyond belief. Maybe a new royal line entirely?
There must be some distant line we can use.
Wait how young is William's eldest kid? Maybe we can send him to live with the Gurkas for a while so he can come back with their bloodlust and not taking shit from no-one.
Almost every royal or near-royal line in consideration are terrible choices though. Anyone after the 'Glorious' Revolution (where Parliament broke their oaths to support a foreign invader, William III, in usurping the throne & turning Britain into the second great modern bankocracy after the Netherlands) is guaranteed to be a cuck puppet of globalist powerbrokers. So that rules out the Oranges, Hanovers & Windsors (Saxe-Coburg-Gothas).
While I understand Jacobite sympathies, their current claimant (Franz, Duke of Bavaria) is a German fag (literally). Not a viable choice either.
I think that leaves the Earl of Loudoun, that one Australian dude descended from George the Duke of Clarence. Also a backstabbing fag who deserved to be drowned in wine, but that was in the 15th century, so fine - let the sins of the distant ancestor not burden his descendant.
Alternatively maybe it's time for a new, actually English royal dynasty. The Wake baronets are purported descendants of Hereward the Wake, a famous Anglo-Saxon rebel against Bill the Bastard's tyranny, and have generally been OK guys not up to any globohomo skullduggery AFAIK. That could be interesting, while we're wishcasting for a new non-pozzed royal house.
Prince Ernst August of Hanover is probably your best bet for the throne tbh but he's an investment banker who worked with Islamic banking and whose wikipedia profile has him with a Jewish man.
Your best bet is a military dictatorship where the dictator starts his own monarchy by right of divine providence or something made up like that to sound fancy.
That's why I suggested giving William's kid a few years with the Gurkas
I'd think it'd put the UK on the right path if anytime these emotional manipulator blackmail class try to control the king, he reaches for his sword and says 'you can either get the fuck out of my country or after I pull this out I'll only seethe it when it's coated in blood' lol
Try the guy in Australia. I believe the Prince of Lichtenstein has a claim as well.
Knowing the UK they import a Patel.
I mean, England is on its fourth? fifth? lineage of "royals", so...
The brits are gay. Waiting for a monarch to save their sorry asses. Why don't you do your own 1776, cuck faggots?
Because that doesn't work for everyone, with ALL the US involvement in the middle east, it should've taught the lesson that different parts of the world require different leadership. There is no 'one shoe fits all sizes' like the globalists claim democracy is.
Worked out so well for you yanks. Hasn't it?