Typical Hollywood bullshit. It's the same shit we saw in GamerGate. Elites in the industry protecting corruption with cronyism.
One reason your posts aren't as compelling as the J narrative you despise is that you lather up clear details with words like "cronyism" that don't improve anyone's understanding of the issue. Where is the cronyism here? Alpert isn't Weinstein's employee and there's no mention of kickbacks or other bribes. Also, Weinstein's predilection for cutting movies is dumb, but from what I can tell there's no corrupt ulterior motive. It's a creative industry and people have strange ideas about what sells. The only gift in this story is from... Miyazaki.
One might argue that only a corrupt industry replete with favoritism and blackmail would allow someone like Weinstein to keep power... but that would have something to do with 60% of the power players in Hollywood being Jewish in a 1980s survey.
And yet the assertion that it is self-evident that a full blown international, intertemporal, racial conspiracy to exterminate the white race makes sense? No, I don't think so.
Yes, it's cronyism, because all corruption requires cronyism. As a tyrant, you require loyalty among your subordinates and surrogates. That requires glad-handing, bribes, influence-peddling, and providing your subordinates and surrogates with things they are otherwise not merited to achieve on their own. This isn't new, this exists, this has been the case in all societies that have ever experienced corruption.
Harvey Weinstein is so well known for corruption and influence peddling it's not denied, and we have the recordings of him trying to pressure women to have sex with him, and we have plenty of women themselves explicitly stating that you can't be popular in Hollywood unless you sleep with him.
But, you've now demanded that I prove that this, and only this, specific request to cut a single movie from Miyazaki was corrupt in anyway, otherwise my claim that Miyazaki stood up to one of the most powerful and corrupt people in Hollywood is false.
But then you accept that he is the powerful and corrupt:
Weinstein to keep power... but that would have something to do with 60% of the power players in Hollywood being Jewish in a 1980s survey.
Ah yes, because only jews are biologically capable of corruption? Oh wait, that doesn't make any sense, and your assertion is beyond asinine. It can't possibly be that corrupt people build networks of corruption to protect their power, it can only be racialism that preforms any corrupt act.
You ask me to prove that corruption exists at all within my claim, and then press the counter-claim that an entire race, through all time and space, is capable only of corruption, and your claim is so patently self-evident it requires no proof whatsoever.
And yet the assertion that it is self-evident that a full blown international, intertemporal, racial conspiracy to exterminate the white race makes sense? No, I don't think so.
I agree. What we have here is not a conspiracy but a tightly bonded ethnic group with a shared sense of their own history and destiny who has strong antipathy towards the dominant white Christian outgroup in much the same way that oh, Africans don't tend to have fuzzy feelings about colonialists. But expressed through a much higher IQ. Now you can reevaluate your febrile post.
Harvey Weinstein is so well known for corruption and influence peddling it's not denied, and we have the recordings of him trying to pressure women to have sex with him, and we have plenty of women themselves explicitly stating that you can't be popular in Hollywood unless you sleep with him.
But, you've now demanded that I prove that this, and only this, specific request to cut a single movie from Miyazaki was corrupt in anyway, otherwise my claim that Miyazaki stood up to one of the most powerful and corrupt people in Hollywood is false.
Your claim that Miyazaki stood up to one of the most powerful and corrupt Hollywood execs is true but your claim that this story is "corruption and cronyism" is dubious.
Is Miyazaki a woman? Is Alpert a woman? Did Harvey try to roger him? Is pressuring Miyazaki to cut his movie some kind of unethical business decision?
Africans don't tend to have fuzzy feelings about colonialists. But expressed through a much higher IQ. Now you can reevaluate your febrile post.
Except you have literally less than zero evidence of this being the case, and asserting that me pointing out the documented fact that Harvey Weinstein is corrupt needs a Gish Gallop to be at least considered.
Here let me re-consider my post from you point: it looks like you want to switch topics to the legitimacy or racialism based on a conspiracy theory you prefer, starting by pushing sophistic bullshit, which tells me that I'm right to re-iterate that being a reductive jew-hater benefits no one except race grifting retards.
Your claim that Miyazaki stood up to one of the most powerful and corrupt Hollywood execs is true but your claim that this story is "corruption and cronyism" is dubious
Hey look, you invented a claim that I didn't make for me.
He stood up to one of the most powerful and corrupt men in Hollywood. Deal with it.
And yet the assertion that it is self-evident that a full blown international, intertemporal, racial conspiracy to exterminate the white race makes sense?
No, it's just that some Jews are Jewish supremacist assholes. Such as the ones who run an industry based almost entirely on nepotism and child trafficking that overwhelmingly hires other Jews who may or may not also be Jewish supremacists.
One reason your posts aren't as compelling as the J narrative you despise is that you lather up clear details with words like "cronyism" that don't improve anyone's understanding of the issue. Where is the cronyism here? Alpert isn't Weinstein's employee and there's no mention of kickbacks or other bribes. Also, Weinstein's predilection for cutting movies is dumb, but from what I can tell there's no corrupt ulterior motive. It's a creative industry and people have strange ideas about what sells. The only gift in this story is from... Miyazaki.
One might argue that only a corrupt industry replete with favoritism and blackmail would allow someone like Weinstein to keep power... but that would have something to do with 60% of the power players in Hollywood being Jewish in a 1980s survey.
And yet the assertion that it is self-evident that a full blown international, intertemporal, racial conspiracy to exterminate the white race makes sense? No, I don't think so.
Yes, it's cronyism, because all corruption requires cronyism. As a tyrant, you require loyalty among your subordinates and surrogates. That requires glad-handing, bribes, influence-peddling, and providing your subordinates and surrogates with things they are otherwise not merited to achieve on their own. This isn't new, this exists, this has been the case in all societies that have ever experienced corruption.
Harvey Weinstein is so well known for corruption and influence peddling it's not denied, and we have the recordings of him trying to pressure women to have sex with him, and we have plenty of women themselves explicitly stating that you can't be popular in Hollywood unless you sleep with him.
But, you've now demanded that I prove that this, and only this, specific request to cut a single movie from Miyazaki was corrupt in anyway, otherwise my claim that Miyazaki stood up to one of the most powerful and corrupt people in Hollywood is false.
But then you accept that he is the powerful and corrupt:
Ah yes, because only jews are biologically capable of corruption? Oh wait, that doesn't make any sense, and your assertion is beyond asinine. It can't possibly be that corrupt people build networks of corruption to protect their power, it can only be racialism that preforms any corrupt act.
You ask me to prove that corruption exists at all within my claim, and then press the counter-claim that an entire race, through all time and space, is capable only of corruption, and your claim is so patently self-evident it requires no proof whatsoever.
Take your bad faith sophistry somewhere else.
I agree. What we have here is not a conspiracy but a tightly bonded ethnic group with a shared sense of their own history and destiny who has strong antipathy towards the dominant white Christian outgroup in much the same way that oh, Africans don't tend to have fuzzy feelings about colonialists. But expressed through a much higher IQ. Now you can reevaluate your febrile post.
Your claim that Miyazaki stood up to one of the most powerful and corrupt Hollywood execs is true but your claim that this story is "corruption and cronyism" is dubious.
Is Miyazaki a woman? Is Alpert a woman? Did Harvey try to roger him? Is pressuring Miyazaki to cut his movie some kind of unethical business decision?
Except you have literally less than zero evidence of this being the case, and asserting that me pointing out the documented fact that Harvey Weinstein is corrupt needs a Gish Gallop to be at least considered.
Here let me re-consider my post from you point: it looks like you want to switch topics to the legitimacy or racialism based on a conspiracy theory you prefer, starting by pushing sophistic bullshit, which tells me that I'm right to re-iterate that being a reductive jew-hater benefits no one except race grifting retards.
Hey look, you invented a claim that I didn't make for me.
He stood up to one of the most powerful and corrupt men in Hollywood. Deal with it.
No, it's just that some Jews are Jewish supremacist assholes. Such as the ones who run an industry based almost entirely on nepotism and child trafficking that overwhelmingly hires other Jews who may or may not also be Jewish supremacists.
And usually the likes of Gizortnik will say they only run industries like that because of high IQs.
"Gizortnik doesn't believe that Russian jews ever farmed"
Really? Fantasict, then perhaps a bit of nuance wouldn't hurt.
Dude, take a break and eat some matzah or something.