Sounds like idiotic fed fishing. He's also disappointed to only be named as "Content creator 6", but happy that he's at least front and center on the picture.
He genuinely seemed excited for the OG transition to Tenet media. But his personal viewer numbers on the Tenet platform seems to have really stagnated.
I had already stopped watching his old call-in show when he signed his new contract, but his new show similarly couldn't keep my attention.
I'm not really sure why, as Matt is a good researcher and a consistently fair presenter.
When he announced the move over to Tenet, he did mention that he felt that it would give him more exposure than their existing shadowbanned channel. And that Tenet's brand would give him access to higher profile guests to interview.
I used to listen to the call-in show back in the Jan 6th era. The problem was that it's a lazy and tired format that depends on audience quality.
Their audience that called in were so spergy. It was all debating theology or esoteric constitutional stuff or circumcision.
I think the aim was to get out of subscriber jail and onto a platform where he could show up in suggested video feeds again, since he's been lamenting that stagnation for years now. Not a bad ploy to try and get more eyeballs on his content, but I kind of doubt it worked.
Just listening to Matt Christiansen's stream about it.
Sounds like idiotic fed fishing. He's also disappointed to only be named as "Content creator 6", but happy that he's at least front and center on the picture.
At this point it really does seem like he’ll never get his hit piece.
The feds will put out a hit on him before they'll give him his hit piece.
So now the FBI can find
their own informant/Russian asset and use it to shut down US independent journalists?Free speech in the US is hanging by a thread.
Matt must have mixed feelings about this.
He genuinely seemed excited for the OG transition to Tenet media. But his personal viewer numbers on the Tenet platform seems to have really stagnated.
I had already stopped watching his old call-in show when he signed his new contract, but his new show similarly couldn't keep my attention.
I'm not really sure why, as Matt is a good researcher and a consistently fair presenter.
I genuinely don't understand what Matt is getting out of Tenet. I don't think they're paying him much. I hope I'm wrong.
And I preferred the call-in show just because I enjoy Blonde's takes. Their contrast makes for a good team. Frank's appearances are also entertaining.
He's the only alt media person I actually give money to because I think he does good work.
When he announced the move over to Tenet, he did mention that he felt that it would give him more exposure than their existing shadowbanned channel. And that Tenet's brand would give him access to higher profile guests to interview.
I used to listen to the call-in show back in the Jan 6th era. The problem was that it's a lazy and tired format that depends on audience quality.
Their audience that called in were so spergy. It was all debating theology or esoteric constitutional stuff or circumcision.
I think the aim was to get out of subscriber jail and onto a platform where he could show up in suggested video feeds again, since he's been lamenting that stagnation for years now. Not a bad ploy to try and get more eyeballs on his content, but I kind of doubt it worked.
As I mentioned in superchat, "The Process Is The Punishment" (which for some strange reason, Matt never heard before).