Trudeau's handpicked judges ruled that they don’t have to actually adjudicate the legality and constitutionality of past laws to "save resources" if the law at present is temporarily suspended.
Oh, good! "Indigenous" have rights now, so we can just Mootness all their legal complaints! Mass graves? They're already dead, it's moot! Abductions? Those were in the past, it's moot! The rapes? Well, are they actively raping you this second? No? Moot!
This is why the voluntary cessation of the ACT in question by the government does not render a case mood in the united states. Otherwise they would just turn off the law anytime they were in danger of losing a court battle and then turn it on again when the coast was clear.
Even more bullshit because they're still hearing a much smaller case about a woman who wasn't allowed to travel to 1 province to visit a sick relative.
Yet this case that impacted millions of Canadians, brought on by a former cabinet minister & current leader of a political party AND a former Premier whose the last living person to sign the charter saying the charter was violated...nah we cool, fam.
Just out of interest, what's the rationale? "no standing?"
It's similar, but more so "mootness"
Trudeau's handpicked judges ruled that they don’t have to actually adjudicate the legality and constitutionality of past laws to "save resources" if the law at present is temporarily suspended.
Oh, good! "Indigenous" have rights now, so we can just Mootness all their legal complaints! Mass graves? They're already dead, it's moot! Abductions? Those were in the past, it's moot! The rapes? Well, are they actively raping you this second? No? Moot!
This is why the voluntary cessation of the ACT in question by the government does not render a case mood in the united states. Otherwise they would just turn off the law anytime they were in danger of losing a court battle and then turn it on again when the coast was clear.
Explain like I'm five.
Ok now explain now I'm not five.
No no no I said now I'm not five.
Oh, you're sure?
Can you explain like the Judge isn't a 5 year old?
Oh.
Even more bullshit because they're still hearing a much smaller case about a woman who wasn't allowed to travel to 1 province to visit a sick relative.
Yet this case that impacted millions of Canadians, brought on by a former cabinet minister & current leader of a political party AND a former Premier whose the last living person to sign the charter saying the charter was violated...nah we cool, fam.