You're free to archive and post the link yourself. It's a free forum, not a paid service where you are the customer. If you don't like the content, then post your own or downvote.
I have defended "review bombing" against leftist shit. Anybody should be allowed to be critical against media for any reason they choose. If some faggot wants to upvote "Moonlight" because it has black faggots, go ahead. I hate they try to disqualify the opposite opinion. If I wish to downvote it, because it has black faggots it's just as valid.
We've all said it a million times the left doesn't care about principles or hypocrisy, just power. Glad this guy flexed his own muscles and told them to kick rocks.
This is why I claim that ratings systems and voting systems are broken, they're an objective failure for any kind of real feedback because of how everything is gamified using bot farms or NPC mobs. I would take the ratings systems away entirely and just do it with comments and how many copies sold.
That people are cucks wanting to be a milquetoast faggot afraid to give offense even when trying to give advice on whether or not someone should purchase a product?
Mixed or neutral is negative. If a game isn't good enough to earn a positive review it's bad. If you're so neutral on it you can't make up your mind, then A: it's bad, because it's a waste of time to play something "neutral" or B: you don't need to review at all.
I disagree and I'd write that from the perspective of a gamer as well, sometimes a game can be 'meh' or there are some good enough points for you not to outright hate it. Rather uncharacteristically for the internet these are people who are clearly wanting to be fair and I've read their reviews before as well on why they want a mixed button because there is such a thing as a product you can be mixed on.
If your opinion is mixed and you feel so strongly about that, that you can't justify a positive or negative review, then your opinion does not serve the purpose of a review system to begin with, which is to inform purchase decisions.
And if a game is "meh" or can't justify a positive value judgement, then that should justify a negative. Because the game costs the consumer money, it should at least be a positive.
The neutral opinion is no review - if someone absolutely must tell the world that they don't have an actual opinion either way, that's just narcissism.
I disagree because of how in particular I know it's very difficult to get proper feedback on a video game but you're entitled to your opinion. Mind you, to provide some balance, I feel like this is exactly what stuff like early access and beta tests were originally meant for.
Feedback for the developer isn't the primary purpose of the review system, though. That's what the forums are for. The review system is for informing consumers.
The comments are just as pozzed. I remember when IMDB had messege boards for every movie, even total crap. But they removed them because they couldn't "keep people safe." Which really means they didn't want to mod shit.
I know people shit on leftists for being snowflakes but there is something to be said sometimes for the kind of shit that gets posted up by nutcases and other types these days. You may wonder why every dev has a discord server instead of reddit or using the steam forums, this shit is exactly why and I can't necessarily blame them. I mean we've seen how much this site alone simply being on clearnet gets creepy spam so it's no wonder things are getting more closed off in response now.
I don't like the idea of having absolutely everything privated and locked but at the same time what exactly are you supposed to do?
I would take the ratings systems away entirely and just do it with comments
How is that any different? Isn't what a player review already is, apart from the additional thumb up / thumb down? How will it fix what you're complaining about?
how many copies sold.
Unfortunately, I don't think Valve is legally allowed to do that. But anyway, again, how would that solve anything you're criticising?
You'd still have retards gaming the system but it would be a lot more obvious, with copies sold you could also see how many people have actually paid for the game versus who's just paid then refunded in order to be a dick which is yes something that people do. I'm not writing it's a magical solution or anything but it might calm things down a bit but as it stands there's no way anyone on either side of things can claim this current system is good by any stretch.
I don't think we'll ever get rid of this kind of thing entirely, but you can at least make it so that it's way more visible. You look on steam games that have been botted up the rankings and read what's there you quickly see it's accounts using the exact same posts for every game.
A fucking screenshot.
FOR ANTS.
🔍
Here's the tweet. Feel free to take and post your own screenshot.
https://x.com/ArturSmiarowski/status/1827386801310593108
With pleasure:
https://ghostarchive.org/archive/Cg9Vp
(you will note that the archive service cannot preserve the flag image, so the screenshot still has some value.)
post an archive link or just don't post.
You're free to archive and post the link yourself. It's a free forum, not a paid service where you are the customer. If you don't like the content, then post your own or downvote.
do as you're told.
Knock off this dumb shit attitude. Archive barely functions and on any halfway decent browser doesn't work at all.
Retarded post.
I have defended "review bombing" against leftist shit. Anybody should be allowed to be critical against media for any reason they choose. If some faggot wants to upvote "Moonlight" because it has black faggots, go ahead. I hate they try to disqualify the opposite opinion. If I wish to downvote it, because it has black faggots it's just as valid.
We've all said it a million times the left doesn't care about principles or hypocrisy, just power. Glad this guy flexed his own muscles and told them to kick rocks.
They're mad he won't add gay marriage in a game where having descendants is a mandatory mechanic
Steam link:
https://store.steampowered.com/app/2399160/Soulash_2/
Oh that was already on my wishlist, guess I'm bumping it up in priority now
Based and pierogi pilled
No better advertising these days than to tell the woke mob to lick deez nuts.
This is why I claim that ratings systems and voting systems are broken, they're an objective failure for any kind of real feedback because of how everything is gamified using bot farms or NPC mobs. I would take the ratings systems away entirely and just do it with comments and how many copies sold.
Also Steam's review system sucks IMO, Thumbs up or Thumbs Down isn't the best system to judge a game.
People have been wanting a mixed/neutral button for ages which tells you something.
That people are cucks wanting to be a milquetoast faggot afraid to give offense even when trying to give advice on whether or not someone should purchase a product?
Mixed or neutral is negative. If a game isn't good enough to earn a positive review it's bad. If you're so neutral on it you can't make up your mind, then A: it's bad, because it's a waste of time to play something "neutral" or B: you don't need to review at all.
I disagree and I'd write that from the perspective of a gamer as well, sometimes a game can be 'meh' or there are some good enough points for you not to outright hate it. Rather uncharacteristically for the internet these are people who are clearly wanting to be fair and I've read their reviews before as well on why they want a mixed button because there is such a thing as a product you can be mixed on.
If your opinion is mixed and you feel so strongly about that, that you can't justify a positive or negative review, then your opinion does not serve the purpose of a review system to begin with, which is to inform purchase decisions.
And if a game is "meh" or can't justify a positive value judgement, then that should justify a negative. Because the game costs the consumer money, it should at least be a positive.
The neutral opinion is no review - if someone absolutely must tell the world that they don't have an actual opinion either way, that's just narcissism.
I disagree because of how in particular I know it's very difficult to get proper feedback on a video game but you're entitled to your opinion. Mind you, to provide some balance, I feel like this is exactly what stuff like early access and beta tests were originally meant for.
Feedback for the developer isn't the primary purpose of the review system, though. That's what the forums are for. The review system is for informing consumers.
The comments are just as pozzed. I remember when IMDB had messege boards for every movie, even total crap. But they removed them because they couldn't "keep people safe." Which really means they didn't want to mod shit.
I know people shit on leftists for being snowflakes but there is something to be said sometimes for the kind of shit that gets posted up by nutcases and other types these days. You may wonder why every dev has a discord server instead of reddit or using the steam forums, this shit is exactly why and I can't necessarily blame them. I mean we've seen how much this site alone simply being on clearnet gets creepy spam so it's no wonder things are getting more closed off in response now.
I don't like the idea of having absolutely everything privated and locked but at the same time what exactly are you supposed to do?
How is that any different? Isn't what a player review already is, apart from the additional thumb up / thumb down? How will it fix what you're complaining about?
Unfortunately, I don't think Valve is legally allowed to do that. But anyway, again, how would that solve anything you're criticising?
You'd still have retards gaming the system but it would be a lot more obvious, with copies sold you could also see how many people have actually paid for the game versus who's just paid then refunded in order to be a dick which is yes something that people do. I'm not writing it's a magical solution or anything but it might calm things down a bit but as it stands there's no way anyone on either side of things can claim this current system is good by any stretch.
I don't think we'll ever get rid of this kind of thing entirely, but you can at least make it so that it's way more visible. You look on steam games that have been botted up the rankings and read what's there you quickly see it's accounts using the exact same posts for every game.
Call of Duty: Black Ops III has nearly 140k reviews. How many do you read before making a decision?
Or if you're Steam, how do you sort reviews?
How many are bots doing positive reviews for internet points and people who hate Activision?
Fuck Polen rats. "Muh parents survived natzees" yet another failure of the Reich