I'm 100% convinced that these contribute to the issue. our diet is so shit compared to even 50 years ago, and the newer generations are growing up with all the shit chemical filled food that we have. as for phone screens, the level of instant gratification that we have today is off the charts compared to even 10 years ago. Critical thinking is no longer a requirement for functioning in this world, and I guarantee we are seeing the downstream effects.
IQ is and has always been mostly Genetic, so neither of those would effect that much. There almost certainly give people brain damage/not fully formed brains or turn them into drooling retards, but that is a separate type of idiocy than pure IQ even if the test measuring it cannot tell the difference.
The difference between someone who is genetically just a lanky boy being unable to gain much muscle, and someone who has a medical issue that prevents them from doing the lifts to gain muscle.
eh, sortof. the more it gets out about what a scam IQ is, the more shit is going to pop off. and no one wants to fix it because any fix will be labeled racist/sexist.
for example, IQ is a relative score vs people your age. and the more you learn "how to think" vs your peers, the more your IQ goes up. this is why, for example, when kids take puberty blockers, it stunts brain development, and the kid "loses" 10+ points of IQ in only a year. it's not that the kid actually lost any points, but that the average around him moved up relative to him. in 2-3 years, it's 20+ points "lost".
meanwhile, more and more studies keep showing that a proper education in critical thinking and spatial geometry measurably increases IQ, sometimes quite significantly. one of the big running examples right now is studying for the LSAT. it's not the only one that does it, but it certainly does.
if there was actually unbiased research going on here, it'd show that every individual has an AQ or aptitude quotient, which is basically the maximum output their brain can possibly achieve under optimal conditions. and AQ is absolutely not equal across races or sexes, not even close. all the social shit, and actually studying, only dictates how much your IQ reaches your AQ. and if you put someone of lower AQ through all the same, they will just cap out. it's why magic dirt theory doesn't work.
even talking about IQ as it is right now is taboo. larry summers, president of harvard years back, was cancelled simply for talking about IQ distributions. there's significantly less variance in female IQ, so even if you conclude men and women average the same, at the ends (120+, 130+, 140+, 80-, 70-, 60-, etc), the men outnumber the women by increasingly larger and larger gaps. by 140 IQ, men outnumber women somewhere between 10:1 to 100:1. this is undisputed data, but he got cancelled for it.
the leftist problem is that they believe no one has higher AQ than anyone else.
That's a good point. I was already onboard the 'diet/pollution' element, and I know screens can be bad, but hadn't really thought about it specifically in the IQ sense.
Not sure if phones make you dumber, at least in the way most people think of, but they do reduce certain elements like you said, like critical thinking. Which would absolutely reflect on IQ test results.
I'd also throw (over)vaccination into the mix. The whole 'autism' thing is used as a scapegoat (whether or not there's some truth there), but I think it's fair to say that the massive increase in childhood vaccines are at least possibly causing adverse effects. It's insane that they don't want to talk about even that, when I phrased it in the most vague and lukewarm way I could.
Whatever is causing people to be dumber, it's at least not completely natural, which means it's - intentionally or otherwise - being done to us. So being told it's a good thing by people who side with the people likely behind the act, just makes it even more clear that it's not a good thing.
Aluminium is neurotoxic and is the primary adjuvant in vaccines.
There are guidelines for intravenous use of medications that state aluminium is to be limited to 5mg per kg of bodyweight. Then immediately below that say they're fine in vaccines.
Well, except for the hard morphology genes ("make this bone bone-shaped"), genes tend to code for potentialities/ranges. Height is probably the most common physical example: Your genes say you have the potential to grow to be between 5'5" and 5'10", say. No matter how bad your diet is, you'll be at least 5'5", and no matter how great your diet and exercise is, you'll never be over six feet tall.
Same for IQ; some people simply won't ever be good at learning in and of itself, or retaining what's learned, or understanding what it is they were supposed to have learned. Others could be good at it, but they've been inhibited somehow (diet, distractions, not being taught how to think/learn/apply what's learned, are domesticated/institutionalized and don't need to think or shift for themselves.)
I imagine that access to the Internet in general has, at least to some extent, had some impact on self reliability with regards to problem solving.
Instead of thinking through possible solutions to try or doing your own research/investigation, it's almost always easier to just run a search to find out how to address things.
Not that I'd say it's a one sided trade-off, because honestly there does come a point to where trying to figure out and investigate everything yourself does become a tedious mess, but it might still come with some price.
Contribute sure, they don’t account for college graduates losing a full standard deviation of IQ in 50 years. It takes advanced starvation to lose a standard deviation, by most accounts social factors can change it about ~4-5 points.
The dumber college graduate thing is a function of exponentially more people going to college plus reduced standards (to sell more useless 200k degrees). It’s basically an open scam at this point.
I'm 100% convinced that these contribute to the issue. our diet is so shit compared to even 50 years ago, and the newer generations are growing up with all the shit chemical filled food that we have. as for phone screens, the level of instant gratification that we have today is off the charts compared to even 10 years ago. Critical thinking is no longer a requirement for functioning in this world, and I guarantee we are seeing the downstream effects.
IQ is and has always been mostly Genetic, so neither of those would effect that much. There almost certainly give people brain damage/not fully formed brains or turn them into drooling retards, but that is a separate type of idiocy than pure IQ even if the test measuring it cannot tell the difference.
The difference between someone who is genetically just a lanky boy being unable to gain much muscle, and someone who has a medical issue that prevents them from doing the lifts to gain muscle.
eh, sortof. the more it gets out about what a scam IQ is, the more shit is going to pop off. and no one wants to fix it because any fix will be labeled racist/sexist.
for example, IQ is a relative score vs people your age. and the more you learn "how to think" vs your peers, the more your IQ goes up. this is why, for example, when kids take puberty blockers, it stunts brain development, and the kid "loses" 10+ points of IQ in only a year. it's not that the kid actually lost any points, but that the average around him moved up relative to him. in 2-3 years, it's 20+ points "lost".
meanwhile, more and more studies keep showing that a proper education in critical thinking and spatial geometry measurably increases IQ, sometimes quite significantly. one of the big running examples right now is studying for the LSAT. it's not the only one that does it, but it certainly does.
if there was actually unbiased research going on here, it'd show that every individual has an AQ or aptitude quotient, which is basically the maximum output their brain can possibly achieve under optimal conditions. and AQ is absolutely not equal across races or sexes, not even close. all the social shit, and actually studying, only dictates how much your IQ reaches your AQ. and if you put someone of lower AQ through all the same, they will just cap out. it's why magic dirt theory doesn't work.
even talking about IQ as it is right now is taboo. larry summers, president of harvard years back, was cancelled simply for talking about IQ distributions. there's significantly less variance in female IQ, so even if you conclude men and women average the same, at the ends (120+, 130+, 140+, 80-, 70-, 60-, etc), the men outnumber the women by increasingly larger and larger gaps. by 140 IQ, men outnumber women somewhere between 10:1 to 100:1. this is undisputed data, but he got cancelled for it.
the leftist problem is that they believe no one has higher AQ than anyone else.
80% genetic isn't it? Primarily from the Mother. And what smart Women are having children these days?
That's a good point. I was already onboard the 'diet/pollution' element, and I know screens can be bad, but hadn't really thought about it specifically in the IQ sense.
Not sure if phones make you dumber, at least in the way most people think of, but they do reduce certain elements like you said, like critical thinking. Which would absolutely reflect on IQ test results.
I'd also throw (over)vaccination into the mix. The whole 'autism' thing is used as a scapegoat (whether or not there's some truth there), but I think it's fair to say that the massive increase in childhood vaccines are at least possibly causing adverse effects. It's insane that they don't want to talk about even that, when I phrased it in the most vague and lukewarm way I could.
Whatever is causing people to be dumber, it's at least not completely natural, which means it's - intentionally or otherwise - being done to us. So being told it's a good thing by people who side with the people likely behind the act, just makes it even more clear that it's not a good thing.
Aluminium is neurotoxic and is the primary adjuvant in vaccines.
There are guidelines for intravenous use of medications that state aluminium is to be limited to 5mg per kg of bodyweight. Then immediately below that say they're fine in vaccines.
worse, I'm seeing 1-2mg recs from Germany, and directly below they refer tp it being fine, citing places like the Paul Ehrich institute.
Of course they do. :(
Well, except for the hard morphology genes ("make this bone bone-shaped"), genes tend to code for potentialities/ranges. Height is probably the most common physical example: Your genes say you have the potential to grow to be between 5'5" and 5'10", say. No matter how bad your diet is, you'll be at least 5'5", and no matter how great your diet and exercise is, you'll never be over six feet tall.
Same for IQ; some people simply won't ever be good at learning in and of itself, or retaining what's learned, or understanding what it is they were supposed to have learned. Others could be good at it, but they've been inhibited somehow (diet, distractions, not being taught how to think/learn/apply what's learned, are domesticated/institutionalized and don't need to think or shift for themselves.)
I imagine that access to the Internet in general has, at least to some extent, had some impact on self reliability with regards to problem solving.
Instead of thinking through possible solutions to try or doing your own research/investigation, it's almost always easier to just run a search to find out how to address things.
Not that I'd say it's a one sided trade-off, because honestly there does come a point to where trying to figure out and investigate everything yourself does become a tedious mess, but it might still come with some price.
Contribute sure, they don’t account for college graduates losing a full standard deviation of IQ in 50 years. It takes advanced starvation to lose a standard deviation, by most accounts social factors can change it about ~4-5 points.
Well a decrease in college graduates' average IQ is easily explained by colleges letting basically everybody in.
The dumber college graduate thing is a function of exponentially more people going to college plus reduced standards (to sell more useless 200k degrees). It’s basically an open scam at this point.