Nice Jesus: When Anon gets it Right
(files.catbox.moe)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (69)
sorted by:
People forgot in their love is love version of Jesus that he specifically said Love to the father was paramount. He told people that if their families kept them from God to leave them.
Yes God wants you to love everyone, but correction is a part of love. If you saw your brother sinning you'd stop him, correct? So stop anyone from sinning because they are your sibling.
This idea that Jesus would accept sin because he was a hippie is laughable. He didn't tolerate sin he insisted you leave it behind to be with him. Jesus would never tell someone God put them in the wrong body, that God fucked up. Satan would do that, but not Jesus.
Enabling is probably one of the most insidious sins out there, and its the one the Left promote the heaviest.
Personally I'd rank it almost equal to the sin it enables itself, because there is solid argument to make that someone wouldn't sin without the enabler supporting them towards it.
This is is what the Western Church has called "scandal." Its also another example of how the English language has drifted. Scandal is considered a "mortal sin" by Roman Catholics precisely because enabling or encouraging others to behave in a detrimental way is evil.
Correct, and doubly so for children. Parenting is taken VERY seriously among real Catholics, because it is a solemn and serious duty to guide your little ones along the right path. Less so among Churchians, who you'll find frequently espouse postmodernist bullshit and exhibit a derision of this duty. I'm very thankful for my own parents, who were not the disinterested and absentee parents as were so many of their generation.
Millstones. That's what I worry about.
Higher maybe, in you're in a teacher or leadership position and enable sin. The Bible has some choice words for teachers who lead others astray
Quite true, once power dynamics get involved its certainly far more evil.
Faith, hope, and love. And the greatest of these is love. The problem is "love' is a pretty shite word, and a piss poor translation of caritas. Caritas is the love that teaches difficult children, the love that leads to an intervention, and the love that begs wayward brethren to return. It has nothing to do romance. In fact older Anglo Christians never said "faith, hope, and love, " they said "faith, hope, and charity." In the modern era I presume this linguistic shift was intentional.
The verse you're talking about is 1 Corinthians 13:13, and the word there is not "caritas", it's "agape".
https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/1co/13/2/ss1/t_conc_1075013
Good point. I've imposed the traditional virtues over scripture; a bad mistake. I think my point may still stand: "love" is still not a great word to stack against agape.
I’ll never understand the Christians who quote judge not but forget that he told the woman go and sin no more
Woah buddy! Who are we to judge? I mean we have the scriptures and two thousand years of tradition, but wouldn't it be mean to tell a sinner they might be making a mistake?
As a note, that passage in the bible was an after the fact addition. It's removed from newer translations specifically because it's a pretty blatant forgery.
Which passage is a forgery?
John 7:53-8:11
It’s been a while but I remember hearing they believe the Gospels come from something called a Q reference or something like that. Been years since I was in the class. I guess my point was you can lovingly tell someone they are in the wrong. People have done so to me.
I do remember reading the Gospel of Thomas was written like 60 or 70 years after the 4 gospels
Are you talking about this? If so, that implies that John was different.
Q reference? So you're saying Q Anon has been around for thousands of years?
Wokies agree, they just call it call in/call out culture. The difference is wokies "correct" you if you're not being degenerate enough.
People simply don't know what love is. They equate it with romanticism and passions. Love is a choice, not a feeling, since feelings are fickle and temporary.
From a Catholic perspective, to love is to selflessly will the good of another.
Sometimes a slap is an act of love.