Secret service now claims Iran is trying to kill Trump
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
I wonder who is going to crack first, you or Imp. My money is on you. You've already started.
The difference is Imp believes what he's saying.
Nope. He wouldn't be an ethnat (but only for Jews) if he did. Him enjoying Starfield is another red flag. No one who actually hates women that much could possibly enjoy that game.
Somehow, him liking Starfield is the bigger red flag of the two. I always assumed the former was him being contrarian because the Jews took attention away from his soapbox.
There's this guy on the RPGCodex, called Vic, who was honored with the custom title of Bethestard thanks to his behavior in the two big Starfield threads there. I've long suspected that he's actually a Vik(ram), chiefly because he constantly rants against women and faggotry, yet has zero problems with the way White men are treated in the game. I know TheImp1 claims he's British, but do we really know if he's a White Brit or a Paki? He seems crazy by normal people's standards, but among the street-shitters his behavior would be par for the course. Except, yeah, I don't know of any pajeets that fetishize the jews.
He claims to be White. I'm betting Ashkenazi.
Lack of access to bobs and vegene explains a lot, actually.
I don't even get what the issue is. The Iranian government conducts lots of black-ops missions. The point is that it's a permanent threat. If the SS had done their job, they wouldn't need to do anything different.
Also, yes I believe what I say, and no I'm a CivNat and you know that. This is because I'm American, and it's a CivNat society. Jews could have an ethno-state, but so could the Irish and the Iroquois.
And I OBJECT to being called a Starfield enjoyer! That is offensive, slanderous, and defamatory.
I prefer Elite Dangerous.
When I say, "crack" I mean come out of the closet as pro-war.
I'm not anti-war, never have been.
I just think wars should be fought for good reasons. There really hasn't been any good reason for a war in a long time.
Invade Iran? Why? Regime Change? You can do that, but the correct way to do that is to make Iran a State once you win. If you're not prepared for "Iranian Statehood" to be a political topic, then you probably shouldn't have that war.
You just wanna do a Thunder Run to Tehran? Okay, got a good reason for it yet? Can you do it with minimal casualties? Can you do it with minimal civilian casualties? Are your friends in the international community going to be pissed at you? How does this actually benefit Americans? No, no, no, no, etc.
Okay, then you're just limited to Operation Praying Mantis 2.0 at best. Now, we go back to why. Do you have a causus belli yet?
So what the real reason? "Iran should accept the Petro-dollar and help us bankrupt America by increasing inflation."
... nope, that's still wrong.
You know Iran won't be made a state. You want war with them anyway, don't you?