He won't admit it, but sure he does. "Wakanda forever!" "We wuz Kangs!" "Black Vikings rule!"
It's all rewriting and "appropriating black culture." Even when it's appropriating blacks into white European culture, it's still trying to rewrite and erase actual black culture and history (with better history).
Commies gonna commie.
EDIT: added context and sarcastic quotations for the retarded.
Retarded comment. There is virtually no historical black culture that is enviable enough to trigger a desire to “appropriate” it. Rewriting black culture to not be embarrassing is doing black culture a favor. That’s why a supermajority of blacks buy into the rampant and blatant revisionism. That’s why you see hardly any blacks coming forward and demanding that you correctly and accurately depict their historical cultures as primitive and barbaric.
Yep, you can easily tell black people don’t give zero shits about their “culture” when it constantly changes to fit whatever narrative gets them free shit
There was the one black girl who refused to be in the movie about black slaver female army movie. She looked up the actual history of the slavers and backed out of the movie
Writing it as “appropriating black culture” makes it sound like black history is the victim, instead of black “history” being the vandal. When they make black vikings or black samurai or whatever, they are not appropriating blacks into the culture. They are appropriating the culture onto blacks.
Writing it as “appropriating black culture” makes it sound like black history is the victim,
It's just turning their own language around on them.
instead of black “history” being the vandal.
What color are the people doing this again? It's far too powerful of a tactic to make it about blacks so you blame blacks, when the blacks are too busy shooting each other to be subverting video game companies.
I said black “history,” not “historians.” Although you shouldn’t entirely ignore the culpability of the race grifter academia blacks as well. They do exist.
As for “turning their language around,” I’m not disagreeing with your tactic, I’m disagreeing with your verbiage. When you say “appropriating black history,” you are saying that pieces of black history are being taken. “Appropriating black history” would be if Ubisoft made an Assassin’s Creed game in Africa but replaced the role the Zulu played with Europeans or something. But there’s no black history involved in this. It’s the blackwashing of someone else’s history. Thus, you should say “appropriating [Japanese] history for blacks.” That’s just grammar. My complaint is that you’re expressing the opposite of what I think you intend to express… unless you really are writing this from a perspective of “those poor dumb blacks, being taken advantage of by the liberals,” in which case, lol.
“Arguing” from the perspective of “actually, you’re the racist” is exactly the sort of “arguing” that the conservative movement has been doing—and losing at—for about 50 years now. Is there ever a point where it leads to saying anything about the actual flaws in black culture, history, or the issues with our great societal nigger-worship?
The problem is no one actually wants to be a part of “black” culture. There’s no throngs of tourists trying to visit black neighborhoods, no one says “hey let’s go to south side Chicago for a relaxing weekend!”.
The difference is, no one tried to re-write history when Afro Samurai was written. It was always considered as fiction from A to Z, and no one said "By the way, he was a real samurai".
However, they tried and keep trying to push Yasuke as a real samurai, even the official AC website says "Yasuke, the powerful African samurai of historical legend.". They are straight up trying to re-write history, and this is where it stops being a purely fictional story.
And still, to this day, no one can say what Yasuke's last name was. All samurais had last name.
I hate that, “IF YOU DON’T LIKE MAKE YOU’RE OWN!” argument, I used it once and that was on an open-source game where I knew if the dude made the thing he wanted ut would have been added to the game, not this non-sense.
Also if you made your own game they'd mass-report you and get whatever you made blacklisted for not being full of nogs, like they tried to do to Kingdom Come: Deliverance.
This might be a hot take, I'm curious to know how others feel about it.
I think there is a big difference between a work of fiction, marketed as fiction, that attempts to be historically accurate to the setting, and historical facts,
vs
A work of fake non-fiction, that lies about history, tells a story that pretends to be true, but then hides behind 'its just fiction, chill out' to deal with critisisms.
It’s a classic motte and bailey. Historical accuracy is obviously a major selling point for the franchise. A black samurai makes no sense in this context. If they wanted to make him a one-off side character, it would still be stupid. The fact that they made him the center of the entire game is nothing less than an overt and deliberate attack on Japanese culture.
Could you give some examples, so it's clear what you mean? The first category would be games like HOI4 and Crusader Kings, but I'm not sure what you're putting down for the second category.
Its not about equality, its equity. Basically you can culturally appropriate cultures as long as you are minority to them. Meaning.. blacks can culturally appropriate all. But other way cannot. Its like how you can say "kill all whites" and rarely get in trouble unless it draws too much attention. But say "kill all blacks" and you will be banned asap.
Because whites and asians are seen as higher, anyone can steal or appropriate from them. But opposite is not allowed.
Very important distinction here, but you are missing something: a certain high IQ, highly influential, extremely wealthy demographic is uniquely and conveniently exempted from this dynamic.
The "any sane person doesn't look for historical accuracy in a freaking video game" bit is incredibly dishonest. If a game bills itself as historically accurate, a sane person would expect it to be so, barring gameplay concessions. The Assassin's Creed would fall under this umbrella, as the premise is you are operating in the shadows of real history.
Saying only one race can make fictional content about certain people is flat out racist
Funny that some woke faggot is saying that - the first Assassin's Creed game had what might literally have been the first 'diversity disclaimer' on the unskippable splash screens, saying "This game was made by a diverse team", because it was about killing Arabs.
They went from "Japanese don't oppose it, its just White racists pretending to be Japanese that oppose it" to "the Japanese who oppose it are far right racist Japanese"
That'd be fair if he also applied it to African and "Black" culture
You know that he doesn't .
He won't admit it, but sure he does. "Wakanda forever!" "We wuz Kangs!" "Black Vikings rule!"
It's all rewriting and "appropriating black culture." Even when it's appropriating blacks into white European culture, it's still trying to rewrite and erase actual black culture and history (with better history).
Commies gonna commie.
EDIT: added context and sarcastic quotations for the retarded.
Retarded comment. There is virtually no historical black culture that is enviable enough to trigger a desire to “appropriate” it. Rewriting black culture to not be embarrassing is doing black culture a favor. That’s why a supermajority of blacks buy into the rampant and blatant revisionism. That’s why you see hardly any blacks coming forward and demanding that you correctly and accurately depict their historical cultures as primitive and barbaric.
Yep, you can easily tell black people don’t give zero shits about their “culture” when it constantly changes to fit whatever narrative gets them free shit
There was the one black girl who refused to be in the movie about black slaver female army movie. She looked up the actual history of the slavers and backed out of the movie
My comment is so retarded you didn't bother to actually disagree with it. Makes me wonder if you actually understood it.
Writing it as “appropriating black culture” makes it sound like black history is the victim, instead of black “history” being the vandal. When they make black vikings or black samurai or whatever, they are not appropriating blacks into the culture. They are appropriating the culture onto blacks.
It's just turning their own language around on them.
What color are the people doing this again? It's far too powerful of a tactic to make it about blacks so you blame blacks, when the blacks are too busy shooting each other to be subverting video game companies.
I said black “history,” not “historians.” Although you shouldn’t entirely ignore the culpability of the race grifter academia blacks as well. They do exist.
As for “turning their language around,” I’m not disagreeing with your tactic, I’m disagreeing with your verbiage. When you say “appropriating black history,” you are saying that pieces of black history are being taken. “Appropriating black history” would be if Ubisoft made an Assassin’s Creed game in Africa but replaced the role the Zulu played with Europeans or something. But there’s no black history involved in this. It’s the blackwashing of someone else’s history. Thus, you should say “appropriating [Japanese] history for blacks.” That’s just grammar. My complaint is that you’re expressing the opposite of what I think you intend to express… unless you really are writing this from a perspective of “those poor dumb blacks, being taken advantage of by the liberals,” in which case, lol.
I was writing from the perspective of "this would cause a dumb liberal to pause for a moment."
Facts and grammatically correct perspectives do not accomplish that, otherwise I wouldn't use their language at all.
“Arguing” from the perspective of “actually, you’re the racist” is exactly the sort of “arguing” that the conservative movement has been doing—and losing at—for about 50 years now. Is there ever a point where it leads to saying anything about the actual flaws in black culture, history, or the issues with our great societal nigger-worship?
The problem is no one actually wants to be a part of “black” culture. There’s no throngs of tourists trying to visit black neighborhoods, no one says “hey let’s go to south side Chicago for a relaxing weekend!”.
The difference is, no one tried to re-write history when Afro Samurai was written. It was always considered as fiction from A to Z, and no one said "By the way, he was a real samurai".
However, they tried and keep trying to push Yasuke as a real samurai, even the official AC website says "Yasuke, the powerful African samurai of historical legend.". They are straight up trying to re-write history, and this is where it stops being a purely fictional story.
And still, to this day, no one can say what Yasuke's last name was. All samurais had last name.
I hate that, “IF YOU DON’T LIKE MAKE YOU’RE OWN!” argument, I used it once and that was on an open-source game where I knew if the dude made the thing he wanted ut would have been added to the game, not this non-sense.
Also if you made your own game they'd mass-report you and get whatever you made blacklisted for not being full of nogs, like they tried to do to Kingdom Come: Deliverance.
Every time we try making our own, they immediately have credit card companies and internet backbone providers Thanos snap us out of reality.
This might be a hot take, I'm curious to know how others feel about it.
I think there is a big difference between a work of fiction, marketed as fiction, that attempts to be historically accurate to the setting, and historical facts,
vs
A work of fake non-fiction, that lies about history, tells a story that pretends to be true, but then hides behind 'its just fiction, chill out' to deal with critisisms.
It’s a classic motte and bailey. Historical accuracy is obviously a major selling point for the franchise. A black samurai makes no sense in this context. If they wanted to make him a one-off side character, it would still be stupid. The fact that they made him the center of the entire game is nothing less than an overt and deliberate attack on Japanese culture.
Could you give some examples, so it's clear what you mean? The first category would be games like HOI4 and Crusader Kings, but I'm not sure what you're putting down for the second category.
Ubisoft is being retarded and hates Japan.
Diversity means conformity. Leftists believe all cultures--properly understood--are progressive.
It's just dumb rhetoric to justify conquest, and why all entryists should be excluded on sight.
Its not about equality, its equity. Basically you can culturally appropriate cultures as long as you are minority to them. Meaning.. blacks can culturally appropriate all. But other way cannot. Its like how you can say "kill all whites" and rarely get in trouble unless it draws too much attention. But say "kill all blacks" and you will be banned asap.
Because whites and asians are seen as higher, anyone can steal or appropriate from them. But opposite is not allowed.
and "minority" to them means the groups that are the worst at creating civilizations or who are the most destructive towards civilization
Very important distinction here, but you are missing something: a certain high IQ, highly influential, extremely wealthy demographic is uniquely and conveniently exempted from this dynamic.
they are not exempted from this dynamic. They are wealthy and high iq but they are still destructive towards civilization.
Someone prove to me that we are all humans.
The "any sane person doesn't look for historical accuracy in a freaking video game" bit is incredibly dishonest. If a game bills itself as historically accurate, a sane person would expect it to be so, barring gameplay concessions. The Assassin's Creed would fall under this umbrella, as the premise is you are operating in the shadows of real history.
Iron law of woke projection
They marry truth to lie so that way they can weasel regardless of your reaction.
Funny that some woke faggot is saying that - the first Assassin's Creed game had what might literally have been the first 'diversity disclaimer' on the unskippable splash screens, saying "This game was made by a diverse team", because it was about killing Arabs.
The woke cries out in pain as it strikes you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JODPYqlgPec&lc=UgwIBV4mo_i9TREEACJ4AaABAg
They went from "Japanese don't oppose it, its just White racists pretending to be Japanese that oppose it" to "the Japanese who oppose it are far right racist Japanese"