Hehe, Biden, Kamala, even Dem senators would VETO the shit out of that. Why, because they know that would cancel A LOT of their grifts if they no longer had immunity.
I'm betting even Obama and Hillary would calling going 'funny virtue signal, but that shit gets close to passing you're gonna start having accidents...'
My thought surrounding that specific case has ALWAYS been to charge him, and see how it shakes out. Doubly so now.
Force the Dems to defend Obama killing an American citizen with no due process and contrast it with them attacking Trump for all the meaningless stuff. Have them look the American people in the face and say the president has ALREADY killed someone without a court case, or the ability to face their accuser (what they’re claiming Trump could do if he gets back into power).
It would put the schizophrenic thought process they have on full display, and reveal to many that the Dems only loyalty is to power and the only way they view the world is through friend/enemy distinctions.
So are ex post facto laws, and Congress has still passed a ex post facto bill of attainder to take back the salaries and benefits of all of the executives of car companies that got bailed out.
Hehe, Biden, Kamala, even Dem senators would VETO the shit out of that. Why, because they know that would cancel A LOT of their grifts if they no longer had immunity.
I'm betting even Obama and Hillary would calling going 'funny virtue signal, but that shit gets close to passing you're gonna start having accidents...'
Obama is imo the real reason why immunity was ruled the way it was.
Because if not, he'd be facing murder charges for the drone strikes on American citizens, in at least one state that has the death penalty.
My thought surrounding that specific case has ALWAYS been to charge him, and see how it shakes out. Doubly so now.
Force the Dems to defend Obama killing an American citizen with no due process and contrast it with them attacking Trump for all the meaningless stuff. Have them look the American people in the face and say the president has ALREADY killed someone without a court case, or the ability to face their accuser (what they’re claiming Trump could do if he gets back into power).
It would put the schizophrenic thought process they have on full display, and reveal to many that the Dems only loyalty is to power and the only way they view the world is through friend/enemy distinctions.
C'mon man, that's easy. All you have to do is specify "This law shall only apply to people named Donald" in the amendment.
Bills of attainder are also banned by the Constitution.
If we change the constitution, then we can make all sorts of crazy laws.
So are ex post facto laws, and Congress has still passed a ex post facto bill of attainder to take back the salaries and benefits of all of the executives of car companies that got bailed out.
Seems like they're floundering a bit. A few dems also tossed up the old "expand the court" idea.
And the article says AoC is going to try to impeach the 2/3 of the court that made the ruling.
It's the bill of rights, not the bill of wrongs.
That one was named Clinton.
Ha chaaaa.
inb4 Biden goes to jail for war profiteering, money laundering, influence peddling, and quite possibly sexual assault of minors.
Who am I kidding, the law only applies to the double plus bad bad people.