One thing I love is how much they obsess over assault rifles as if a good bolt action rifle can't be extremely effective in combat or even a revolver and it shows they know even less about guns than I do and I'm British. I mean seriously, have you seen what people do with revolvers at shooting shows?
Less than 4% of gun deaths are caused by rifles, and that includes bolt action, lever action, and the like. Most gun deaths are from the most common kind of handgun on the market (which are 9mm pistols these days) because they're easily concealable. Those crimes are also mostly committed by blacks which is another reason that no one wants to talk about it.
You ever see or watch a video of someone who's been caught stealing or with some kind of contraband like drugs or something? They've got the item in one of their pockets, and they know it's there. So they almost instinctually go through this elaborate show of turning out all the rest of their pockets, backpack, purse, etc to show they don't have anything in hopes you won't notice that one place they skipped. That's what society is like with blacks. Deep down everyone knows they are intrinsically a massive drain and destructive element. But admitting that is the one thing they're not willing to do. So they have to go through a show of coming up with bigger and bigger elaborate and ridiculous excuses for why all the problems they cause aren't their fault. When the answer to a question is the one thing you cannot say above all else, but you're still required to give an answer, the only choice is to keep saying anything other than the one correct answer in hopes you can keep bullshitting long enough to make the question go away, or at least become someone else's problem.
Blacks are, by a vast majority, incompatible with advanced civilization. That is not to say 100% of them are, but it's close enough it might as well be 100%. It's like how human beings are mammals with 4 limbs. Yes, there is the occasional birth defect that makes some kid be born without legs or arms, but those rare exceptions don't alter the fundamental definition of human being. Blacks like Clarence Thomas or Thomas Sowell are rare genetic abnormalities. In other parts of the world, evolutionary selection for intelligence, problem solving, rational thought, long term planning, etc made sense because as Europeans or Asians made more advances to survive, being able to plan and devise more elaborate technology or systems made sense. That didn't happen in Africa. Maybe if they had been left alone for another thousand years it might have, but it didn't. They are still genetically the same agrarian tribesman every other race was 10,000 years ago. But as everyone else developed, and the smart long term thinkers had more kids than the violent brutes, leading to the races as a whole being disposed towards intelligence and planning, Africans never went through that.
If Africans had faced the same environmental and cultural pressures on their own as the rest of the world, and had been given enough time to let breeding and survival selection run its course, the genetics that created Dr. Ben Carson or Thomas Sowell might have become dominant and edged out the violent brute survival traits. But for a myriad of reasons we can debate all day, that didn't happen. The predominant genetic line of Africans and their descendants is still the violent short term thinking brute traits that everyone else mostly bred out thousands of years ago.
And then they got imported around the world to do manual labor and we're still dealing with the fallout. No amount of education or stable families or Christian values can wipe away the tendencies thousands of years of genetic preference imbued them with. At least not with thousands more years of those positive influences doing their best to force breeding selection for more advanced traits. It's simply not possible for it to happen in our lifetimes or even your great great great great grandchildren's lifetimes. As long as African descended people live among us, we're going to have to deal with the repercussions of a group whose only response to any problem is to try to beat it with a rock till it goes away and then dance around hooting when they've won. Either that or move them all back to Africa, quarantine the whole continent and watch from afar in hopes we'll get to witness their own version of the Greek Classical Enlightenment, inventing Roman infrastructure, the Renaissance, etc.
I grew up in Africa, lived among Zulu’s, Xhosa, Swazi, Mozambican, Nigerian, Malawian and Zimbabweans.
Every single thing you said above is 100% accurate.
The only thing I doubt is that there’ll ever be any kind of enlightenment or whatever on that continent. Its days of great civilisations are buried somewhere deep beneath the sands of Egypt, it’s done.
My grandmother used to tell me they were the descendants of Cain (that whole thing from the bible about how his descendants would be marked by a stain on their skin and how all the tribes of the world would hate them and curse them and forever cast them out etc). The older I get, the more it sounds about right to me.
While it's fair to say that you're correct about Blacks, it's not just Blacks.
Only European developed modern society & technology, and even European peoples are not adapted to them. It's wrong to pretend like these other groups integrate. They all introduce problems, it's just the question of how much of the problem you accept.
Take away modern tech from India & China and you'd reduce scamming online by 90%, for example. Why does the rest of the internet have to suck just for them?
Anyone looking to disarm you is looking to prey upon you and should be met with extreme hostility if not outright violence and I'm tired of pretending otherwise. Disarming someone is a direct physical attack with malicious intent and should be interpreted as such.
I have a friend who does that as a hobby. There are jokes about setting a duffel bag full of money on fire to compete. He can hit 300 yard shots and is considered terrible.
One thing I love is how much they obsess over assault rifles as if a good bolt action rifle can't be extremely effective in combat or even a revolver and it shows they know even less about guns than I do and I'm British. I mean seriously, have you seen what people do with revolvers at shooting shows?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gx-2M1r-Sh8
Took me five seconds to find as well lol.
Less than 4% of gun deaths are caused by rifles, and that includes bolt action, lever action, and the like. Most gun deaths are from the most common kind of handgun on the market (which are 9mm pistols these days) because they're easily concealable. Those crimes are also mostly committed by blacks which is another reason that no one wants to talk about it.
You ever see or watch a video of someone who's been caught stealing or with some kind of contraband like drugs or something? They've got the item in one of their pockets, and they know it's there. So they almost instinctually go through this elaborate show of turning out all the rest of their pockets, backpack, purse, etc to show they don't have anything in hopes you won't notice that one place they skipped. That's what society is like with blacks. Deep down everyone knows they are intrinsically a massive drain and destructive element. But admitting that is the one thing they're not willing to do. So they have to go through a show of coming up with bigger and bigger elaborate and ridiculous excuses for why all the problems they cause aren't their fault. When the answer to a question is the one thing you cannot say above all else, but you're still required to give an answer, the only choice is to keep saying anything other than the one correct answer in hopes you can keep bullshitting long enough to make the question go away, or at least become someone else's problem.
Blacks are, by a vast majority, incompatible with advanced civilization. That is not to say 100% of them are, but it's close enough it might as well be 100%. It's like how human beings are mammals with 4 limbs. Yes, there is the occasional birth defect that makes some kid be born without legs or arms, but those rare exceptions don't alter the fundamental definition of human being. Blacks like Clarence Thomas or Thomas Sowell are rare genetic abnormalities. In other parts of the world, evolutionary selection for intelligence, problem solving, rational thought, long term planning, etc made sense because as Europeans or Asians made more advances to survive, being able to plan and devise more elaborate technology or systems made sense. That didn't happen in Africa. Maybe if they had been left alone for another thousand years it might have, but it didn't. They are still genetically the same agrarian tribesman every other race was 10,000 years ago. But as everyone else developed, and the smart long term thinkers had more kids than the violent brutes, leading to the races as a whole being disposed towards intelligence and planning, Africans never went through that.
If Africans had faced the same environmental and cultural pressures on their own as the rest of the world, and had been given enough time to let breeding and survival selection run its course, the genetics that created Dr. Ben Carson or Thomas Sowell might have become dominant and edged out the violent brute survival traits. But for a myriad of reasons we can debate all day, that didn't happen. The predominant genetic line of Africans and their descendants is still the violent short term thinking brute traits that everyone else mostly bred out thousands of years ago.
And then they got imported around the world to do manual labor and we're still dealing with the fallout. No amount of education or stable families or Christian values can wipe away the tendencies thousands of years of genetic preference imbued them with. At least not with thousands more years of those positive influences doing their best to force breeding selection for more advanced traits. It's simply not possible for it to happen in our lifetimes or even your great great great great grandchildren's lifetimes. As long as African descended people live among us, we're going to have to deal with the repercussions of a group whose only response to any problem is to try to beat it with a rock till it goes away and then dance around hooting when they've won. Either that or move them all back to Africa, quarantine the whole continent and watch from afar in hopes we'll get to witness their own version of the Greek Classical Enlightenment, inventing Roman infrastructure, the Renaissance, etc.
I grew up in Africa, lived among Zulu’s, Xhosa, Swazi, Mozambican, Nigerian, Malawian and Zimbabweans.
Every single thing you said above is 100% accurate.
The only thing I doubt is that there’ll ever be any kind of enlightenment or whatever on that continent. Its days of great civilisations are buried somewhere deep beneath the sands of Egypt, it’s done.
My grandmother used to tell me they were the descendants of Cain (that whole thing from the bible about how his descendants would be marked by a stain on their skin and how all the tribes of the world would hate them and curse them and forever cast them out etc). The older I get, the more it sounds about right to me.
Well, if those "We Wuz Dick Washers" images are real, it means that the Jews knew of subsaharan blacks and thought they were shit, too.
While it's fair to say that you're correct about Blacks, it's not just Blacks.
Only European developed modern society & technology, and even European peoples are not adapted to them. It's wrong to pretend like these other groups integrate. They all introduce problems, it's just the question of how much of the problem you accept.
Take away modern tech from India & China and you'd reduce scamming online by 90%, for example. Why does the rest of the internet have to suck just for them?
remove black gun violence, and the US is well within EU stats.
remove latino gun violence, and the US is one of the safest places on earth.
gun control is basically saying black and brown people shouldn't be able to own guns.
So how would you reply to someone saying: well, that just means "we" need to ban handguns as well?
Anyone looking to disarm you is looking to prey upon you and should be met with extreme hostility if not outright violence and I'm tired of pretending otherwise. Disarming someone is a direct physical attack with malicious intent and should be interpreted as such.
Oh they know. Don't think they are totally stupid. They just know they can't disarm the population all at once.
The elites yes, but don't underestimate the retards.
I have a friend who does that as a hobby. There are jokes about setting a duffel bag full of money on fire to compete. He can hit 300 yard shots and is considered terrible.
If the government is telling the truth, and we all know they never lie, Kennedy was killed by a bolt action rifle.
that's the point. after they get semi autos, they will go after everything else.