Say that all you want, doesn't make it not evil. Also, some countries showed restraint and decency...others didn't.
Let me know when America starts running multiple comfort women brothels in multiple nations
Muh comfort women.
...then come and tell me about how you deserve nukes. Or just mass killing people and putting them into graves in multiple fronts.
We do so much worse. Including ruin various countries and prop up their puppet regimes while they do so much worse. Our governments run guns and drugs to the cartels, for instance, who do some of the most gruesome shit it's possible to do to fellow humans, including your examples of forced prostitution and mass graves.
Hell, we fund and arm most of our biggest enemies, for that matter.
What is the point of your question? Whether countries deserved to be nuked when they're committing atrocities? Yeah, if you can get away with it. If you could nuke ISIS strongholds without any fallout, wtf wouldn't you.
I admit I'm not sure I get the point. So you're saying if Japan could have gotten away with nuking America, it would have been justified?
Or are you trying to retrospectively try and justify nuking America, Germany and Russia? If so, then you're a fucking moron
Again, if Japanese cities were "legitimate targets," so were cities in those countries. So I don't have to make an argument justifying the nuking of America, Germany and Russia...you already did. Not only did they all committed atrocities, but cities are legitimate targets to begin with, so I suppose if someone could have gotten away with it they all deserved nuking. Again, that's your argument, not me.
No, my argument is that Japan deserved nuking. Not that hypothetically America deserves nuking because I don't do hypotheticals. If Japan had the nukes at the time and America was behaving like Japan did at the time while Japan wasn't, then sure, maybe America should have gotten nuked
But I don't want to make dumb hypothetical arguments like that because a) japan didn't have the nukes and America wasn't behaving like japan. All I can tell you is that based on the situation in WW2, Japan deserved nuking and it turned out well
A lot of people are trying to translate that event into modern day politics which is retarded because the times were different, the scales of the atrocities being committed were diifferent. They think the argument that Japan should have been nuked back then is somehow an argument to nuke people now, like you and your idea that this is justifying the nuking of America/Germany/Russia. No, you fucking moron because we're not in the late stages of a WW3 where such actions may have to be taken
I don't really have a dog in this fight but just pointing out thats what someone says when he got owned and wants to change the subject, see every press secretary ever
Its still better than the "thinkers" who come up with hypotheticals of everything. What if Germany was nuked back then, or America or Russia. Or every possible country that ever committed anything bad.
Say that all you want, doesn't make it not evil. Also, some countries showed restraint and decency...others didn't.
Muh comfort women.
We do so much worse. Including ruin various countries and prop up their puppet regimes while they do so much worse. Our governments run guns and drugs to the cartels, for instance, who do some of the most gruesome shit it's possible to do to fellow humans, including your examples of forced prostitution and mass graves.
Hell, we fund and arm most of our biggest enemies, for that matter.
I admit I'm not sure I get the point. So you're saying if Japan could have gotten away with nuking America, it would have been justified?
Again, if Japanese cities were "legitimate targets," so were cities in those countries. So I don't have to make an argument justifying the nuking of America, Germany and Russia...you already did. Not only did they all committed atrocities, but cities are legitimate targets to begin with, so I suppose if someone could have gotten away with it they all deserved nuking. Again, that's your argument, not me.
No, my argument is that Japan deserved nuking. Not that hypothetically America deserves nuking because I don't do hypotheticals. If Japan had the nukes at the time and America was behaving like Japan did at the time while Japan wasn't, then sure, maybe America should have gotten nuked
But I don't want to make dumb hypothetical arguments like that because a) japan didn't have the nukes and America wasn't behaving like japan. All I can tell you is that based on the situation in WW2, Japan deserved nuking and it turned out well
A lot of people are trying to translate that event into modern day politics which is retarded because the times were different, the scales of the atrocities being committed were diifferent. They think the argument that Japan should have been nuked back then is somehow an argument to nuke people now, like you and your idea that this is justifying the nuking of America/Germany/Russia. No, you fucking moron because we're not in the late stages of a WW3 where such actions may have to be taken
I don't really have a dog in this fight but just pointing out thats what someone says when he got owned and wants to change the subject, see every press secretary ever
Its still better than the "thinkers" who come up with hypotheticals of everything. What if Germany was nuked back then, or America or Russia. Or every possible country that ever committed anything bad.
Following someone else's logic to a conclusion is not a "hypothetical." It's just pointing out where your logic leads.
You're the one coming up with justifications for intentionally nuking civilians.