There is no puzzle unless you are basing your perception on preconceived notions of what they believe.
Murdering babies being bad has no opposition to white identity beliefs unless you believe that pro-white people are so cartoonishly racist that they must be rabidly itching to murder black babies at all times.
So you "not understanding how one can be both" reveals your own presumptions. Whether they are true or purposefully antagonizing to argue with people.
And I do believe its more of the second option than the first. Because clearly the stormfags didn't ruin the place enough, as you once yelled they would, so you feel compelled to kick the hornet's nest to get them mad at you for....some purpose I can't fathom other then being obnoxious.
Murdering babies being bad has no opposition to white identity beliefs unless you believe that pro-white people are so cartoonishly racist that they must be rabidly itching to murder black babies at all times.
You don't need to be 'cartoonishly evil' to not want the situation to get much worse, from your own perspective. Also, not everyone views abortion as 'murdering babies'. A lot of people oppose it as good because it forces women to take responsibility, or so they think.
And I do believe its more of the second option than the first. Because clearly the stormfags didn't ruin the place enough, as you once yelled they would, so you feel compelled to kick the hornet's nest to get them mad at you for....some purpose I can't fathom other then being obnoxious.
Questioning people's beliefs is not "kicking the hornet's nest".
A lot of people oppose it as good because it forces women to take responsibility
Which is still not in any opposition to any basic tenant of white nationalism by requirement. The only way it is, is if they hate blacks so much that "killing niggers by any means necessary" is a core part of their ideology that tops above many other things.
That is a cartoonishly evil perspective that you have assigned to them, which is so reductionistic of any belief they may hold that it can only be done in bad faith or from sheer ignorant retardation.
Which is still not in any opposition to any basic tenant of white nationalism by requirement. The only way it is, is if they hate blacks so much that "killing niggers by any means necessary" is a core part of their ideology that tops above many other things.
Don't be obtuse. I know you like your 'attack Antonio streak', but it's not that difficult to follow this train of logic: if you are a white nationalist and don't believe abortion is 'murder', then being anti-abortion makes no sense as you are sabotaging your own objectives.
I'm not being obtuse. Your position was nonsensical.
There is absolutely nothing about white nationalism that requires one to be pro-abortion. In a very specific subset of both those two groups can you find the ability for them to come to a hard opposition that cannot be solved, but that requires stretching until you can work backwards from what you want to see to make someone fit.
Like I said originally. Acting like the MSM: finding the handful of retards to fit your idea and then treating them as representative to attack from there.
There is no puzzle unless you are basing your perception on preconceived notions of what they believe.
Murdering babies being bad has no opposition to white identity beliefs unless you believe that pro-white people are so cartoonishly racist that they must be rabidly itching to murder black babies at all times.
So you "not understanding how one can be both" reveals your own presumptions. Whether they are true or purposefully antagonizing to argue with people.
And I do believe its more of the second option than the first. Because clearly the stormfags didn't ruin the place enough, as you once yelled they would, so you feel compelled to kick the hornet's nest to get them mad at you for....some purpose I can't fathom other then being obnoxious.
You don't need to be 'cartoonishly evil' to not want the situation to get much worse, from your own perspective. Also, not everyone views abortion as 'murdering babies'. A lot of people oppose it as good because it forces women to take responsibility, or so they think.
Questioning people's beliefs is not "kicking the hornet's nest".
Which is still not in any opposition to any basic tenant of white nationalism by requirement. The only way it is, is if they hate blacks so much that "killing niggers by any means necessary" is a core part of their ideology that tops above many other things.
That is a cartoonishly evil perspective that you have assigned to them, which is so reductionistic of any belief they may hold that it can only be done in bad faith or from sheer ignorant retardation.
And that is in fact kicking the hornet's nest.
Don't be obtuse. I know you like your 'attack Antonio streak', but it's not that difficult to follow this train of logic: if you are a white nationalist and don't believe abortion is 'murder', then being anti-abortion makes no sense as you are sabotaging your own objectives.
I'm not being obtuse. Your position was nonsensical.
There is absolutely nothing about white nationalism that requires one to be pro-abortion. In a very specific subset of both those two groups can you find the ability for them to come to a hard opposition that cannot be solved, but that requires stretching until you can work backwards from what you want to see to make someone fit.
Like I said originally. Acting like the MSM: finding the handful of retards to fit your idea and then treating them as representative to attack from there.