When they ask Trump about abortion, he should literally say we don’t have time to talk about anything other than the invasion. Building the wall, a moratorium on all immigration, and mass deportation. These are winning stances. Opposing abortion is a can that must be kicked down the road until America is saved from the great replacement. Mass abortion flows from feminism. Mortally wounding that ideology will prevent more abortions than any law.
Very true. Abortion and any number of other issues are only important if you have a functional and stable population. Right now they're have the borders open with hundreds of thousands of people coming in each year. Who cares if abortion is legal when an entire state's worth of people become displaced within a term limit.
While I'm neither a white nationalist nor anti-abortion, I don't understand how you can be both.
After all, that would vastly increase the black population that they dislike so much. I can hear them saying: "no, we'd EXPEL them" - but fact is, pro-life is an issue that can actually succeed, while that other thing is if not fantasy, at least extraordinarily unlikely to be implemented.
You propose that desiring both 1) a white ethnostate and 2) laws against abortion is stupid because the former can probably never happen. But the abortion clause of your argument doesn’t actually impact the conclusion. It’s entirely vestigial.
By this same logic, the only necessary premise for white nationalism to be declared unsound is the fact that it is extraordinarily unlikely to succeed”. You could pair white nationalism with literally any other idea in this format and arrive at the same conclusion. Because it’s a tautology.
Do you often imagine you have created “gotchas” that don’t actually exist? Are the gotchas in the room with us now?
It does impact the conclusion. It's not automatically bad to try to fight for something that may be difficult to achieve. However, when banning abortion is way more likely and it would hurt your 'main cause', it is pretty ridiculous to hold that position. You are far more likely to succeed in your fight against abortion, and if you do, it would hurt what you view as more important.
Because for most people abortion is a moral stance, not purely political.
You can't say "I'll allow some murder of my side for a while because it murders the other side more, and I'll get to it later when I'm comfortable." People are being murdered in their logic, whether its all people or just white people, and that's a very bad thing.
Your logic only works if racism is exactly like the MSM portrays it. Frothing at the mouth hate of niggers as the only single thing they can possibly think of, to the point of no logic as long as "kill niggers." And you aren't that stupid.
In fact, its quite pathetic how much you've lowered yourself and your own intellectual ability just so you can play whack a mole with Stormfags for giggles.
Your logic only works if racism is exactly like the MSM portrays it.
I'm not calling them racist. I think that's stupid. I'm just puzzled by their position. I'm not a white nationalist, and the last thing I want is for more single black women to have kids that they don't want.
I also object to having such 'moral' positions because it leads to political disaster.
In fact, its quite pathetic how much you've lowered yourself and your own intellectual ability just so you can play whack a mole with Stormfags for giggles.
You have this preconceived notion that you advance at every turn, rather than recognizing that this is pretty inconsistent, and that it is reasonable to remark on it.
There is no puzzle unless you are basing your perception on preconceived notions of what they believe.
Murdering babies being bad has no opposition to white identity beliefs unless you believe that pro-white people are so cartoonishly racist that they must be rabidly itching to murder black babies at all times.
So you "not understanding how one can be both" reveals your own presumptions. Whether they are true or purposefully antagonizing to argue with people.
And I do believe its more of the second option than the first. Because clearly the stormfags didn't ruin the place enough, as you once yelled they would, so you feel compelled to kick the hornet's nest to get them mad at you for....some purpose I can't fathom other then being obnoxious.
Your understanding of ethnonationalism is at wikipedia, after-school-special, elementary-school assembly with "special guests" tier.
Yes some ethnonationalists would prefer a purely White state where Italians would be the brownest people they ever encountered under any circumstances. But all but the tiniest miniscule minority realize that won't happen outside of a genie-wish-granting-fantasy world (I'll have a coke).
The vast majority of us would happily compromise for a return the 50s, where there were some areas that were de-facto free from blacks, when there was meaningful punishment for black anti-social behavior, and the government didn't pay negresses to pump out niglets, so they actually had to get and stay married to survive thus keeping them from turning into the giant public embarrassments many of them are now.
Yes some ethnonationalists would prefer a purely White state where Italians would be the brownest people they ever encountered under any circumstances.
Clearly, you've never been to Naples. Some Italians are insanely dark.
The vast majority of us would happily compromise for a return the 50s, where there were some areas that were de-facto free from blacks, when there was meaningful punishment for black anti-social behavior, and the government didn't pay negresses to pump out niglets, so they actually had to get and stay married to survive thus keeping them from turning into the giant public embarrassments many of them are now.
Leaving word usage aside for a moment, that's not that unreasonable. But if you do want to pay 'negresses' to pump out 'niglets', why on earth would you force them to do that instead of getting an abortion?
When they ask Trump about abortion, he should literally say we don’t have time to talk about anything other than the invasion. Building the wall, a moratorium on all immigration, and mass deportation. These are winning stances. Opposing abortion is a can that must be kicked down the road until America is saved from the great replacement. Mass abortion flows from feminism. Mortally wounding that ideology will prevent more abortions than any law.
Very true. Abortion and any number of other issues are only important if you have a functional and stable population. Right now they're have the borders open with hundreds of thousands of people coming in each year. Who cares if abortion is legal when an entire state's worth of people become displaced within a term limit.
While I'm neither a white nationalist nor anti-abortion, I don't understand how you can be both.
After all, that would vastly increase the black population that they dislike so much. I can hear them saying: "no, we'd EXPEL them" - but fact is, pro-life is an issue that can actually succeed, while that other thing is if not fantasy, at least extraordinarily unlikely to be implemented.
Why is your logic so retarded?
Here, I’ll explain.
You propose that desiring both 1) a white ethnostate and 2) laws against abortion is stupid because the former can probably never happen. But the abortion clause of your argument doesn’t actually impact the conclusion. It’s entirely vestigial.
By this same logic, the only necessary premise for white nationalism to be declared unsound is the fact that it is extraordinarily unlikely to succeed”. You could pair white nationalism with literally any other idea in this format and arrive at the same conclusion. Because it’s a tautology.
Do you often imagine you have created “gotchas” that don’t actually exist? Are the gotchas in the room with us now?
The abortion ban in Texas has increased the amount of black and brown babies while leaving Whites birth rate flat
Abortion bans simply increase the black numbers, as they abort at a 4x rate
All White nationalists should support abortion
It does impact the conclusion. It's not automatically bad to try to fight for something that may be difficult to achieve. However, when banning abortion is way more likely and it would hurt your 'main cause', it is pretty ridiculous to hold that position. You are far more likely to succeed in your fight against abortion, and if you do, it would hurt what you view as more important.
How does that make sense?
Because for most people abortion is a moral stance, not purely political.
You can't say "I'll allow some murder of my side for a while because it murders the other side more, and I'll get to it later when I'm comfortable." People are being murdered in their logic, whether its all people or just white people, and that's a very bad thing.
Your logic only works if racism is exactly like the MSM portrays it. Frothing at the mouth hate of niggers as the only single thing they can possibly think of, to the point of no logic as long as "kill niggers." And you aren't that stupid.
In fact, its quite pathetic how much you've lowered yourself and your own intellectual ability just so you can play whack a mole with Stormfags for giggles.
I am perfectly fine with black abortions. In fact, I’d love to fund it exclusively.
I want to discourage White abortions as much as possible.
I'm not calling them racist. I think that's stupid. I'm just puzzled by their position. I'm not a white nationalist, and the last thing I want is for more single black women to have kids that they don't want.
I also object to having such 'moral' positions because it leads to political disaster.
You have this preconceived notion that you advance at every turn, rather than recognizing that this is pretty inconsistent, and that it is reasonable to remark on it.
There is no puzzle unless you are basing your perception on preconceived notions of what they believe.
Murdering babies being bad has no opposition to white identity beliefs unless you believe that pro-white people are so cartoonishly racist that they must be rabidly itching to murder black babies at all times.
So you "not understanding how one can be both" reveals your own presumptions. Whether they are true or purposefully antagonizing to argue with people.
And I do believe its more of the second option than the first. Because clearly the stormfags didn't ruin the place enough, as you once yelled they would, so you feel compelled to kick the hornet's nest to get them mad at you for....some purpose I can't fathom other then being obnoxious.
Your understanding of ethnonationalism is at wikipedia, after-school-special, elementary-school assembly with "special guests" tier.
Yes some ethnonationalists would prefer a purely White state where Italians would be the brownest people they ever encountered under any circumstances. But all but the tiniest miniscule minority realize that won't happen outside of a genie-wish-granting-fantasy world (I'll have a coke).
The vast majority of us would happily compromise for a return the 50s, where there were some areas that were de-facto free from blacks, when there was meaningful punishment for black anti-social behavior, and the government didn't pay negresses to pump out niglets, so they actually had to get and stay married to survive thus keeping them from turning into the giant public embarrassments many of them are now.
Clearly, you've never been to Naples. Some Italians are insanely dark.
Leaving word usage aside for a moment, that's not that unreasonable. But if you do want to pay 'negresses' to pump out 'niglets', why on earth would you force them to do that instead of getting an abortion?