Which is still not in any opposition to any basic tenant of white nationalism by requirement. The only way it is, is if they hate blacks so much that "killing niggers by any means necessary" is a core part of their ideology that tops above many other things.
Don't be obtuse. I know you like your 'attack Antonio streak', but it's not that difficult to follow this train of logic: if you are a white nationalist and don't believe abortion is 'murder', then being anti-abortion makes no sense as you are sabotaging your own objectives.
I'm not being obtuse. Your position was nonsensical.
There is absolutely nothing about white nationalism that requires one to be pro-abortion. In a very specific subset of both those two groups can you find the ability for them to come to a hard opposition that cannot be solved, but that requires stretching until you can work backwards from what you want to see to make someone fit.
Like I said originally. Acting like the MSM: finding the handful of retards to fit your idea and then treating them as representative to attack from there.
There is absolutely nothing about white nationalism that requires one to be pro-abortion
Yes, there is. I repeat, the fact that 40% of abortions go to blacks, and thus abortion helps keep the black population lower than it would otherwise be.
Like I said originally. Acting like the MSM: finding the handful of retards to fit your idea and then treating them as representative to attack from there.
Whom did I 'find'? I even made an exception for your fictional group of people who have 'moral' rather than political positions.
I repeat, the fact that 40% of abortions go to blacks, and thus abortion helps keep the black population lower than it would otherwise be.
And white nationalism isn't solely defined and required to be "murder niggers" as its top priority. This may shock you, because it seems to be the cornerstone of your position, but those groups have more to their belief system than racism.
fictional
Right, because nobody can possibly have a position sprouting from morals. It must always be a transactional idea that one creates based on manipulation and power dynamics. That's why all pro-lifers only do it to control women's bodies, after all.
It doesn't matter if my "fictional group" exists or not, regardless. Even on a purely political ideology it can run the gamut from "I prefer deportation to killing them" to "I think letting the government have that power is a greater evil" to "We just need to be segregated, I don't hate them." All of which exist just fine in white national belief systems.
You just can't be wrong, so you keep moving the goalposts all around to avoid having to admit to that.
Don't be obtuse. I know you like your 'attack Antonio streak', but it's not that difficult to follow this train of logic: if you are a white nationalist and don't believe abortion is 'murder', then being anti-abortion makes no sense as you are sabotaging your own objectives.
I'm not being obtuse. Your position was nonsensical.
There is absolutely nothing about white nationalism that requires one to be pro-abortion. In a very specific subset of both those two groups can you find the ability for them to come to a hard opposition that cannot be solved, but that requires stretching until you can work backwards from what you want to see to make someone fit.
Like I said originally. Acting like the MSM: finding the handful of retards to fit your idea and then treating them as representative to attack from there.
Yes, there is. I repeat, the fact that 40% of abortions go to blacks, and thus abortion helps keep the black population lower than it would otherwise be.
Whom did I 'find'? I even made an exception for your fictional group of people who have 'moral' rather than political positions.
And white nationalism isn't solely defined and required to be "murder niggers" as its top priority. This may shock you, because it seems to be the cornerstone of your position, but those groups have more to their belief system than racism.
Right, because nobody can possibly have a position sprouting from morals. It must always be a transactional idea that one creates based on manipulation and power dynamics. That's why all pro-lifers only do it to control women's bodies, after all.
It doesn't matter if my "fictional group" exists or not, regardless. Even on a purely political ideology it can run the gamut from "I prefer deportation to killing them" to "I think letting the government have that power is a greater evil" to "We just need to be segregated, I don't hate them." All of which exist just fine in white national belief systems.
You just can't be wrong, so you keep moving the goalposts all around to avoid having to admit to that.