Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

21
Illinois Supreme Court agrees to hear Jussie Smollett appeal (archive.is)
posted 2 years ago by FuckGenderPolitics 2 years ago by FuckGenderPolitics +21 / -0
12 comments share
12 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (12)
sorted by:
▲ 22 ▼
– FuckGenderPolitics [S] 22 points 2 years ago +22 / -0

This has Big Mike's chicken grease fingerprints all over it. I hope Jussie is ready to get spit roasted because Barry and Mike are going to expect something in return for all the strings they've pulled for this faggot.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– Smith1980 20 points 2 years ago +20 / -0

You’ve got to be kidding. That story had holes in it from the beginning

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– ThePipeGuy 15 points 2 years ago +15 / -0

How many times has he doubled down on this bullshit now?

Infinity down.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 11 ▼
– nuggetpatrol 11 points 2 years ago +11 / -0

What more needs to be said. It had plot holes bigger than the two guys he hired to rough him up.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– FrozeInFear 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

It sounds like the appeal was shit-flinging against the whole process and something stuck.

...In his appeal, Smollett argued that Cook County prosecutors dropping the case resolved it, similar to a deferred prosecution agreement, particularly because he forfeited his bail.
Attorneys for the state, though, among other arguments, contended that prosecutors who drop charges are not precluded from refiling charges in the same case.
In the majority opinion delivered by Judge David Navarro and concurred with by Judge Mary Ellen Coghlan, the judges wrote that Smollett “challenges virtually every aspect of the second prosecution that resulted in his convictions and sentence.”
“The record does not establish that Smollett entered into a nonprosecution agreement with the (Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office), in which the (office) agreed to forgo further prosecution of him in exchange for his performance of community service and the forfeiture of his bond,” the opinion reads.
[earlier in the article] After the decision, Smollett asked the state’s high court to hear the case, a decision up to the discretion of the judges. In asking the court to review his case, Smollett had argued that the lower court’s opinion “threatens to upend all informal and formal deferred prosecution agreements."

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– LauriThorne 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

There's no such thing as an "informal" deferred prosecution agreement and he should have known that, or his idiot lawyers should have.

Verbal agreements don't hold water with no evidence to back it up.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– FrozeInFear 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Well, whatever "agreement" there was, the dissenting judge from the appellate court claimed that there was merit to Smollett's argument because he fulfilled his responsibility from it.

Judge Freddrenna Lyle dissented, arguing that “Smollett gave up something of value, community service and bond forfeiture, in exchange for a nolle of the whole indictment.”

I can only assume this is the main part of the appeal that the higher court is taking up.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– LauriThorne 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

Illinois is a hell hole anyway.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– lapalapa 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

He's stuck forever telling a lie he knows nobody believes. A slave to pride.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– WeedleTLiar 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

I assume it will be heard for the comedy value.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– rebuildingMyself 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

"Your Honor, I did all this to make Trump and his supporters look bad. The now Vice President used my delusion as a springboard to get some racist policies in place. You have to see the forest for the trees and it's just (D)ifferent"

permalink save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy