Women are going to get piledrived into the ground if they play at a professional level then as going against men in a physical contact sport is not just bodily harm, in something like rugby that's maim/death territory.
Men don't have to worry whatsoever in that regard, the only issue is when they have some violent diversity play that doesn't obey the rules like with the hockey death recently.
''If we obfuscate what our shit product is, people will accidentally buy tickets or tune-in thinking they are getting the other product with the same name they wanted.''
I'm pretty sure this would be considered a form of false advertisement by any consumer-protection agency not corrupted by Feminism.
I've seen more women's sports on TVs in sports bars over the past year than my entire life combined up to that point. I go back and forth thinking it's intentional subversion and then thinking it's just some retarded executives at ESPN thinking they can double profits if they get people to care about women's sports.
WWE tried this a few years ago. They had the NXT heavyweight title, which is the male belt, and the Women's title. They dropped the Womens from the Women's title. It confused people and the same feminist were mad that woman was removed because it was important that girls knew they had their own spaces.
I wish women would fucking figure it out so I can see more bloodbath between the troon freaks and the feminist freaks. Unfortunately rich white women seem to be having hard time deciding which level of retarded they wanna be. I can’t imagine raising your daughter to play volleyball just to get spiked in the face an injured by a dude and you just smile and shrug it off like that wasn’t a predator in a dress that seriously hurt your child.
They hold the men's and women's competitions simultaneously, using the same venues, but they're not playing each other. You can't get away with that in rugby. No woman is strong enough to contend with a front line of eight players all in excess of 250 pounds slamming into you at full speed. And there's no padding.
it's not meant to 'help' anything, it's not insane, it's just another male demoralisation ritual. Its very calculated and it's been going on for a while. In football/soccer, for example, you're supposed to be confused when they refer to the Women's World Cup - a laughable waste of time for incompetent lesbians, which nobody watches - as just 'the World Cup', which is the most watched sporting event on the planet. If you're a dumb normie, you're then supposed to feel guilty that you assumed the women's world cup was a completely separate insignificant thing, particularly if you go as far as to ask why they didn't specify 'Women's', as you'll probably get berated by any nearby retarded feminists for being so exclusionary. You're just supposed to sit there and cheer the thing on TV as if you really wanted to watch it when you didn't.
Dishonest feminists will argue that they're just trying to amplify and elevate muh poor wimminz sports, but by design it comes with a tradeoff in tv airtime and media discussion for male sports, not to mention trading out the very concept that there is any sphere of interest which should remain wholly male.
Women are going to get piledrived into the ground if they play at a professional level then as going against men in a physical contact sport is not just bodily harm, in something like rugby that's maim/death territory.
Men don't have to worry whatsoever in that regard, the only issue is when they have some violent diversity play that doesn't obey the rules like with the hockey death recently.
''If we obfuscate what our shit product is, people will accidentally buy tickets or tune-in thinking they are getting the other product with the same name they wanted.''
I'm pretty sure this would be considered a form of false advertisement by any consumer-protection agency not corrupted by Feminism.
Love how they still call it "women's World Cup", but just don't capitalize the W.
Such progress
I’m not very familiar with rugby but last I watched they still had male and female teams. Odd that they would do this, but this seems to be the push.
It's a case of ''how do we force-feed the public with this inferior product they don't want?''
I've seen more women's sports on TVs in sports bars over the past year than my entire life combined up to that point. I go back and forth thinking it's intentional subversion and then thinking it's just some retarded executives at ESPN thinking they can double profits if they get people to care about women's sports.
If it's ESPN it's intentional subversion guaranteed.
WWE tried this a few years ago. They had the NXT heavyweight title, which is the male belt, and the Women's title. They dropped the Womens from the Women's title. It confused people and the same feminist were mad that woman was removed because it was important that girls knew they had their own spaces.
I wish women would fucking figure it out so I can see more bloodbath between the troon freaks and the feminist freaks. Unfortunately rich white women seem to be having hard time deciding which level of retarded they wanna be. I can’t imagine raising your daughter to play volleyball just to get spiked in the face an injured by a dude and you just smile and shrug it off like that wasn’t a predator in a dress that seriously hurt your child.
Does that mean they are integrated? Or are there two Rugby World Cups that just happen to be for separate sexes?
They hold the men's and women's competitions simultaneously, using the same venues, but they're not playing each other. You can't get away with that in rugby. No woman is strong enough to contend with a front line of eight players all in excess of 250 pounds slamming into you at full speed. And there's no padding.
it's not meant to 'help' anything, it's not insane, it's just another male demoralisation ritual. Its very calculated and it's been going on for a while. In football/soccer, for example, you're supposed to be confused when they refer to the Women's World Cup - a laughable waste of time for incompetent lesbians, which nobody watches - as just 'the World Cup', which is the most watched sporting event on the planet. If you're a dumb normie, you're then supposed to feel guilty that you assumed the women's world cup was a completely separate insignificant thing, particularly if you go as far as to ask why they didn't specify 'Women's', as you'll probably get berated by any nearby retarded feminists for being so exclusionary. You're just supposed to sit there and cheer the thing on TV as if you really wanted to watch it when you didn't.
Dishonest feminists will argue that they're just trying to amplify and elevate muh poor wimminz sports, but by design it comes with a tradeoff in tv airtime and media discussion for male sports, not to mention trading out the very concept that there is any sphere of interest which should remain wholly male.