The new scaremonger tactic? Christian Nationalism
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (67)
sorted by:
So Matthew 26:51 talks about someone who drew a sword, and cut off the ear of the slave of the high priest.
And John 18:10 says that Simon Peter drew a sword, and cut off the ear of the slave of the high priest.
And you think that these are two different events? You think that "someone" in Matthew isn't Peter?
Wow. That's sad.
You seem to be entirely unaware that the gospels recount the same events from different perspective and different words. You have so little bible knowledge that you think that Matthew 26:52 and John 18:10 describe different events. You've clearly proven how well you know your bible, and that is, not at all.
That's sad. You are like a sheep, skinned and thrown about, without a shepherd.
Read your bible. If you even have one, that is.
No I know they do. However, you can’t prove they are both the same account of the same person being attacked. And since you love being a pedantic retard you quoting the wrong scripture for the 5th time your screeching is hilarious. Or maybe it’s another “forgery”. Oh wait you lost literally every single pathetic argument you tried making. Once again, you wanted to rant your stupidity.
Yes I can, easily.
Both gospels explicitly mention a date, and a celebration around all these events occurred. The Passover, and the meal that took place on that date. This is the "last supper". John, in chapter 13, and Matthew in 26.
There is only one Last Supper. After this last supper, they all went to the garden of Gethsemane, where he was betrayed and arrested.
Both accounts depict Jesus being betrayed by Judas, with him bringing the ones who would arrest him. This only happened once.
Are you saying that Jesus was betrayed by Judas and arrested twice, and in both cases a slave of the high priest had his ear cut off?
Did Jesus escape one of those times, so that he needed to be arrested twice? How many "last suppers" did he have? How many times did he meet Pilate?
Read your Bible, you are embarrassing yourself. This is basic Bible stuff that children know.
Can you prove only one slave was attacked? No? Oh that right, see what happens when you argue semantics Mr. No Christian ever used self defense?
Because both accounts say "the slave" not "a slave", and the account in John gives him a name. Neither account says that "slaves", plural, were attacked. In fact, all four gospels, Matthew, Mark, Like, and John all say "the slave".
Don't you think it would be a huge, unlikely, coincidence that two or four different apostles drew swords and managed to cut off ears of four different slaves of the same high priest? Were they trained specifically to cut off ears?
This is just sad.