The new scaremonger tactic? Christian Nationalism
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (67)
sorted by:
Because both accounts say "the slave" not "a slave", and the account in John gives him a name. Neither account says that "slaves", plural, were attacked. In fact, all four gospels, Matthew, Mark, Like, and John all say "the slave".
Don't you think it would be a huge, unlikely, coincidence that two or four different apostles drew swords and managed to cut off ears of four different slaves of the same high priest? Were they trained specifically to cut off ears?
This is just sad.
Yes only one account gives the name of a slave who got his ear cut off. So once again you don’t have any irrefutable proof that it was only one slave correct?
...And your point is? Oh, I guess you don't have one.
I gave my irrefutable proof already. You didn't refute it. So I guess we're done here.
You don’t, you’re screeching because you can’t verify only one slave had their ear cut off. Sad day for Mr semantics huh? Going to start screeching that the book of John is a forgery again?
I verified it already. All books say "the slave". You didn't refute it.