The new scaremonger tactic? Christian Nationalism
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (67)
sorted by:
No I know they do. However, you can’t prove they are both the same account of the same person being attacked. And since you love being a pedantic retard you quoting the wrong scripture for the 5th time your screeching is hilarious. Or maybe it’s another “forgery”. Oh wait you lost literally every single pathetic argument you tried making. Once again, you wanted to rant your stupidity.
Yes I can, easily.
Both gospels explicitly mention a date, and a celebration around all these events occurred. The Passover, and the meal that took place on that date. This is the "last supper". John, in chapter 13, and Matthew in 26.
There is only one Last Supper. After this last supper, they all went to the garden of Gethsemane, where he was betrayed and arrested.
Both accounts depict Jesus being betrayed by Judas, with him bringing the ones who would arrest him. This only happened once.
Are you saying that Jesus was betrayed by Judas and arrested twice, and in both cases a slave of the high priest had his ear cut off?
Did Jesus escape one of those times, so that he needed to be arrested twice? How many "last suppers" did he have? How many times did he meet Pilate?
Read your Bible, you are embarrassing yourself. This is basic Bible stuff that children know.
Can you prove only one slave was attacked? No? Oh that right, see what happens when you argue semantics Mr. No Christian ever used self defense?
Because both accounts say "the slave" not "a slave", and the account in John gives him a name. Neither account says that "slaves", plural, were attacked. In fact, all four gospels, Matthew, Mark, Like, and John all say "the slave".
Don't you think it would be a huge, unlikely, coincidence that two or four different apostles drew swords and managed to cut off ears of four different slaves of the same high priest? Were they trained specifically to cut off ears?
This is just sad.
Yes only one account gives the name of a slave who got his ear cut off. So once again you don’t have any irrefutable proof that it was only one slave correct?