The new scaremonger tactic? Christian Nationalism
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (67)
sorted by:
I am not arguing that Jesus doesn't want people to sin. I am just saying, that the "let he who is without sin cast the first stone" account is likely a forgery.
That's what I thought, you couldn't name a single Christian who acted in self-defense.
Why do you think that, just because Jesus did something, all Christians are authorized to do that thing? I've clearly shown that not all Christians are authorized for forgive sins, so there must be more to it than "Jesus did it!"
And you can't name a single Christian who acted in self-defense.
So what leads you to believe that Christians are authorized to use violence?
I’m sorry you’re now claiming a completely different line is a forgery. So you’re clearly retarded…
Your argument is that because Jesus said to act in self defense but it was not depicted specifically in the New Testament you are somehow correct? The cognitive dissonance is hilarious.
Now, I know you’re retarded and sperging, but that is very clearly Jesus telling his disciples to arm themselves isn’t it!?
I am talking about John 8:1-11. Those verses include one of Jesus' "go and sin no more" quotes and "let he who is without sin cast the first stone".
All of those verses are a suspected forgery, and I've been talking about the same thing this whole time, you just don't know your bible.
He didn't tell Christians to act in self defense.
And what's the next thing that happened? Jesus reproving Peter and telling him "live by the sword, die by the sword".
What do you think that means?
You clearly have no fucking clue what you’re talking about again, retard, it is said TWICE in John. You claim of “forgery” is also complete conjecture. So moot point either way.
Yes he did, once again both Jesus and God repeatedly promote self defense throughout the Bible. Your attempted retarded nitpicking is pathetic.
Wasn’t Peter, again you show more conjecture than knowledge. Is there a difference between constant using violence “living by the sword” and using violence as a means of defense “sell the cloak off your back and buy a sword”. Clearly you’re either intentionally obtuse or so retarded you can’t actually see the difference. Either way you’re not worth talking to.
Okay, since you know your Bible so well, who was it? What does John 18:10 say? Please quote it for us
If John 18:10 says that it wasn't Peter, then I will concede that you know more about the Bible than I do. If you get it wrong, however, then that means I know more than you. Deal?
Okay so go on, what does John 18:10 say?