I am not arguing that Jesus doesn't want people to sin. I am just saying, that the "let he who is without sin cast the first stone" account is likely a forgery.

I’m sorry you’re now claiming a completely different line is a forgery. So you’re clearly retarded…

That's what I thought, you couldn't name a single Christian who acted in self-defense.

Your argument is that because Jesus said to act in self defense but it was not depicted specifically in the New Testament you are somehow correct? The cognitive dissonance is hilarious.

Why do you think that, just because Jesus did something, all Christians are authorized to do that thing? I've clearly shown that not all Christians are authorized for forgive sins, so there must be more to it than "Jesus did it!" And you can't name a single Christian who acted in self-defense. So what leads you to believe that Christians are authorized to use violence?

And He said to them, “But now, whoever has a money belt is to take it along, likewise also a bag, and whoever has no sword is to sell his cloak and buy one.

Now, I know you’re retarded and sperging, but that is very clearly Jesus telling his disciples to arm themselves isn’t it!?