The new scaremonger tactic? Christian Nationalism
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (67)
sorted by:
I am talking about John 8:1-11. Those verses include one of Jesus' "go and sin no more" quotes and "let he who is without sin cast the first stone".
All of those verses are a suspected forgery, and I've been talking about the same thing this whole time, you just don't know your bible.
He didn't tell Christians to act in self defense.
And what's the next thing that happened? Jesus reproving Peter and telling him "live by the sword, die by the sword".
What do you think that means?
You clearly have no fucking clue what you’re talking about again, retard, it is said TWICE in John. You claim of “forgery” is also complete conjecture. So moot point either way.
Yes he did, once again both Jesus and God repeatedly promote self defense throughout the Bible. Your attempted retarded nitpicking is pathetic.
Wasn’t Peter, again you show more conjecture than knowledge. Is there a difference between constant using violence “living by the sword” and using violence as a means of defense “sell the cloak off your back and buy a sword”. Clearly you’re either intentionally obtuse or so retarded you can’t actually see the difference. Either way you’re not worth talking to.
Okay, since you know your Bible so well, who was it? What does John 18:10 say? Please quote it for us
If John 18:10 says that it wasn't Peter, then I will concede that you know more about the Bible than I do. If you get it wrong, however, then that means I know more than you. Deal?
Okay so go on, what does John 18:10 say?
Good, never speak again retard because the passage “live by the sword, die by the sword” is in Matthew 26:52.
So Matthew 26:51 talks about someone who drew a sword, and cut off the ear of the slave of the high priest.
And John 18:10 says that Simon Peter drew a sword, and cut off the ear of the slave of the high priest.
And you think that these are two different events? You think that "someone" in Matthew isn't Peter?
Wow. That's sad.
You seem to be entirely unaware that the gospels recount the same events from different perspective and different words. You have so little bible knowledge that you think that Matthew 26:52 and John 18:10 describe different events. You've clearly proven how well you know your bible, and that is, not at all.
That's sad. You are like a sheep, skinned and thrown about, without a shepherd.
Read your bible. If you even have one, that is.