Stonetoss at it again
(media.scored.co)
Comments (25)
sorted by:
Alternative third panels:
"What if I googled one parent households by race?"
"What if I googled reverence for education by race?"
"What if I googled drug use by race?"
"What if I googled IQ by race?"
"What if I googled criminality and reverence for criminals by race?"
"What if I googled college application rate by race?"
When it comes to "Diversity is our strength", blacks are somehow so different from whites they bring a unique point of view in every field and thought process, but when it comes to explaining the cause of different outcomes, they're exactly identical in every way.
IQ by country is even more telling. Turns out centuries of legal incest have turned the arab race into subhumans.
Weren't the biggest and smallest person in the world also Arabs? Incest causes so many issues. You can even tell by looking at how some of them look also.
Couldn't tell you. I don't really track that world record stuff tbh.
Even income by race, white people are slightly above average.
I think when it comes to taxes, only whites and asians actually contribute more than they take out.
and only men
You are a slave.
It's going to differ pace on country too. The overseas demographic is also different from a domestic demographic.
I think Ashkenazi Jews are already considered a race, and they appear at the top of any income list that includes them.
The fact that you can pick a Jew out of a lineup based on nothing but physical appearance should consider them a race no matter what definition someone tries to use.
Anyone trying to say they aren't is trying to dodge that fact because they know it will bring them consequences to not be able to hide with the Whites anymore.
About 95% of Jewish Americans are Ashkenazi. 80% globally. Ashkenazi out earn every other Jewish type even in Israel.
That's typically not true. Near the top, but typically not at the top. Normally you get stuff like Indians.
This has only become even potentially true recently due to all of the racist hiring and promotion practices that Indian managers have used to take over all of the tech industry, and only really applies to the US. Indians aren't some magical brilliant, hard-working demographic -- they're just extremely nepotistic.
That coincidence is kind of telling, though.
Actually, like the chinese, overseas indians are actually sufficiently more competent and successful than the majority of the domestic population. Kind of like how Africans do well in the US as well. It's a bit of a biased selection of high performers.
Nepotism wouldn't surprise me, but I suspect it's probably closer to regionalism and classism (caste-ism?) if we were going to pick one. But, successful performance is definitely present.
I'm not trying to say that Modi isn't trying to push it. If you're a nationalist, don't forget to keep them in your nation to improve your nation. Don't colonize everyone else.
Indian managers will typically only hire other Indians. Once a new hire is brought on, however, they go hard on casteism. Articles like this one come out a couple times a year.
This hasn't been my experience so far, but I would suspect the caste-ism would occur before hiring as well.
Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Falsehoods
This seems to be an opinion, based on the things he said in further replies.
Income inequality is directly caused by effort and ability inequality.
Mark Chabenisky
You don't fix racial discrimination with racial discrimination.
How about we start with you instead?
You mean the portugese?