It honestly just needs a pretty simple refresh to account for modern technology and some clarifications on absolute freedoms and who they should apply to.
I've airways thought the bill of rights should be called something a little more clear. Namely, the bill of things the government is not allowed to make laws on
Actually well said. The use of euphemisms is highly problematic in a legal document and should be as clear as possible, even though the intention of the original authors is quite clear for someone without ulterior motives.
I've seen a complete rewrite that worked. But regardless. Failed state is failed state. If the constitution couldn't prevent it, the document is a failure. Not good enough.
It was neutered from the beginning and has does slowly ever since
The constitution is a garbage neutered piece of useless garbage lol what are you on about.
It's a collection of feel good platitudes. I'm with Spooner.
I never said it's a perfect document, but it's way better than anything we'd get if they started fresh today.
It honestly just needs a pretty simple refresh to account for modern technology and some clarifications on absolute freedoms and who they should apply to.
I've airways thought the bill of rights should be called something a little more clear. Namely, the bill of things the government is not allowed to make laws on
Actually well said. The use of euphemisms is highly problematic in a legal document and should be as clear as possible, even though the intention of the original authors is quite clear for someone without ulterior motives.
maybe eliminate an amendment or two
Like I said:
I've seen a complete rewrite that worked. But regardless. Failed state is failed state. If the constitution couldn't prevent it, the document is a failure. Not good enough.
It was neutered from the beginning and has does slowly ever since
Michael Malice fan?
Never heard of.him