If you wonder why Wikipedia is so biased, here’s a typical administrator’s userpage
(media.communities.win)
Comments (20)
sorted by:
A group of people who, when asked to stop creeping on little kids, immediately act aggrieved and start posturing like they're being oppressed.
the trannies or the jews?
Yes.
One: Why not both?
Two: Both?
One: Yes ... both.
Both: Both.
"this user can contribute with a near-native level of english"
directly contradicted by the first box.
Maybe they're fluent but for a baffling ignorance of pronouns.
Letting proto-leftoids put they/themselves in charge of the last encyclopedia 20 years ago was such a stupid move.
It's funny they realized that smug fuck's face was driving away donations and got rid of it.
Sending money to them is like tipping Twitter. Even if you like them they are already getting what they want when you use it.
DONATE TO WIKIPEDIA BIGOT
Sure you do, I bet you can lift up that much.
So, his pronouns in Portuguese are they/them?
Jimbo aggressively denies the far left bias despite the fact the rules are deliberately structured to only allow woke sources.
He is openly hiding behind section 230.
This old fucking faggot is exactly like Jack Dousey from Twitter. A lot of effort to only hire only far-leftists and pretend their platform is fair. Only when they have nothing to do with it anymore, they suddenly will act like they are le based.
Looks like someone isn't a fan of J.K Rowling
I hate how right my old teachers were about Wikipedia. God damn it.
"wikileftia the free propaganda website anyone* can edit"
*(not you)
old clasic:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/fZuztONhHMnk/