Javier Milei announced the repeal of the Land Law: what the law says
The norm establishes a limit on the purchase of rural land by foreign citizens up to 1,000 hectares in the core area or a surface equivalent depending on territorial location.
At the same time, sets at 15% the limit on all ownership of domain or possession of fields in national territory for foreign persons, both natural and legal. The objective of the law is to put a limit on the foreignization of lands.
That alone, combined with the new tax laws where he raised taxes for local companies and lower them for foreigners, it's gonna end up destroying local companies and foreigners are gonna take over.
Argentina is over, forever, sold out to the global elites.
What is the point of a nation that does not work to benefit the tribe that comprises it?
Some (many?) libertarians think the idea of nation is an evil and unnecessary detriment to free markets. In other words, just a different flavor of globalist.
Raised taxes on exports (to companies that sell their products to the international market), and lower them on imports (products entering the country's local market).
It is a hostile policy to local companies, since internationally they will have to sell at a higher price, locally as well, and the products of foreign companies will have a lower price.
It is an explicitly anti-liberal and anti-libertarian tax policy. (It's called deindustrialization policy).
There is a reason why Donald Trump's protectionism made sense, how do you compete in a market where foreign companies have slave labor in Africa and Asia, and can afford to take your market with low prices and slowly destroy your companies that can't compete?.
In the short term you experience real price drops that solve inflation, but in the medium and long term your companies go bankrupt and are acquired by foreign companies, and have practically no competition.
This leaves your entire country completely dependent on mega corporations, billionaires and foreign states (who control the flow of products and production), who will have a very strong position of influence over your politicians in matters of diplomacy and law.
Raised taxes on exports (to companies that sell their products to the international market), and lower them on imports (products entering the country's local market).
I was asking for numbers, not an explanation.
And I'm not arguing for or against what he's done, just pointing out that it's not inconsistent with a libertarian philosophy.
And I'm also not arguing for or against libertarian philosophy.
Libertarianism is utopian nonsense that just like communism ignores human nature in favor of feverish idealism. Both empower hierarchies in the hope that they'll eventually diminish their own power voluntarily (they won't).
Firstly I hold no economic system as sacred, they are just tools and I refuse to be forced into the Marxist dichotomy of capitalism vs socialism. Secondly I'm a monarchist who was once staunchly libertarian.
Here's my take on politics . if America isnt beating the war drums against your country, i assume that your country is run by sell outs in one way or another. .And even then i still think it could be run by sell outs.
The socialists in Argentina were negotiating to join the BRICS together with Brazil, and were also negotiating the purchase of military weapons and fighter jets from China. And out of nowhere, here comes this guy who gives away the nation to the globalists, talking shit about China and Russia, but at the same time licking Israel and the US's ass, and funded by people with connections to Israel, the UK and the US?
It is too convenient to be just a coincidence, especially because diplomatically taking sides in an eventual world war is suicide for Argentina, there is no need for it.
And to praise "Western democracies", including Israel (which is not even a democracy and to say otherwise is to lie, as Milei has done.), seeing all that they are doing against the freedom of their people, is to be a total hypocrite.
I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. He's said good enough things and has passed enough good enough policies to deserve that, at the very least.
Milei is under a lot of pressure to bring Argentina back on its feet. If a short term measure like this is what it takes to bring foreign investors and merchants back to Argentina, then so be it. As long as it doesn't become a permanent policy, it might be what it takes to bring people back in the door and spending money, increasing the value of the Argentinian market and making their money be worth more than toilet paper.
Yeah, I remember when people said Milei "wouldn't get anything done because he'll get blocked" and "he'll turn the country into a Zionist ethnostate" and now it's "he's bending the knee to the globalists" because one law out of 300 might possibly somehow have negative issues and we all know he can't just make a new law if things get out of hand.
If you're expecting anything less than perfection from a reformer trying to do whatever he can to pull his nation out of a downward spiral, you're fucking brain dead and shouldn't be listened to.
Yes, Milei has been on a warpath with cutting massive amounts of burdensome of regulations and other government bullshit. Sometimes, when you're cutting fat, you're likely to hit bone.
But I guess it's easier for people here to be picking cherries than to be popping them.
My beef is not with the people at the top, but rather with their smarmy useful idiots. I don't care if the powerful wind up owning Argentina as long as Argentina's economy turns around because of the massive cutting of benefits.
I don't care about screwing over the rich and powerful. I care about screwing over the socialist ideologs.
The law described is the one that is repealed, there will be no law of the land at all, that's how screwed up it is.
There is no protection for Argentina national sovereignty with this.
That is why the Biden administration had a delegation on the day of his inauguration as president, the same reason the New York Jewish mafia was having "religious meetings" with him, about "spiritual guidance with his rabbi", the same reason the damn Zelensky was there, and the same reason he worked all his life for Eduardo Eurkenian, a billionaire who has connections and has been financing "Mapuche International" (a fake indigenous guerrilla in Argentina), backed by the UK.
Regardless of how much I agree with his philosophy, this law repeal may very well be the reason he was allowed to win. That and switching to the dollar.
I wonder what the right-wing nationalists who voted for him think about all this.
"National socialist" you JIDF always miss out the "National " part for some reason
Also your problem isnt about socialism your problem is White nationalism and anyone that says anything against jews.
And you've defined criticism against jews as being "socialist" or "leftist", despite the fact that jews are the biggest advocates for marxist socialism and leftism.
And the war is less about socialism vs capitalism, and more about internationalism vs nationalism. Internationalist capitalism with no nationalism which allows foreign money to mess with your country, is just as bad as marxist socialism .
Stormfaggot doesn't like free markets because the money doesn't go to women to fund muh white births.
You especially don't like Milei because he stood both against Palestine, and against your female masters. How are your co-workers in Argentina coping with their job losses?
So you basically admited being a leftist scumbag. Way to use Marxism ideology. Because it was him who connected the Jews to capitalism, just like you are doing.
Jews are connected to both marxism and capitalism. Marx is one of those rare jews that will say jews are connected to capitalism, but other marxist jews will not be as honest. And other marxist jews also created the Frankfurt School ideology which was even worse than the original marxism.
Marx came from a long line of jewish rabbis from both sides of the family, he was steeped in jewish culture and ideology and marxism was born from jewish ideology that everyone else must be cattle whilst a small group of G̶o̶d̶'̶s̶ ̶c̶h̶o̶s̶e̶n̶ ̶o̶n̶e̶s̶ elite chosen ones rule with an iron fist. Sound familiar?
Archive - https://archive.ph/Cr0X6
That alone, combined with the new tax laws where he raised taxes for local companies and lower them for foreigners, it's gonna end up destroying local companies and foreigners are gonna take over.
Argentina is over, forever, sold out to the global elites.
I didn't hear about that one. That's even more damning for a so-called libertarian.
Raised them from what to what, and lowered them from what to what?
If they had protectionist tax laws to begin with, equalizing them, which is 100% in line with libertarian beliefs, would be exactly this.
Similarly, allowing foreign entities to buy land is 100% in line with libertarian beliefs.
Which is why libertarianism is a failed, meme, philosophy. What is the point of a nation that does not work to benefit the tribe that comprises it?
Some (many?) libertarians think the idea of nation is an evil and unnecessary detriment to free markets. In other words, just a different flavor of globalist.
Sounds like socialism is what you prefer.
Raised taxes on exports (to companies that sell their products to the international market), and lower them on imports (products entering the country's local market).
It is a hostile policy to local companies, since internationally they will have to sell at a higher price, locally as well, and the products of foreign companies will have a lower price.
It is an explicitly anti-liberal and anti-libertarian tax policy. (It's called deindustrialization policy).
There is a reason why Donald Trump's protectionism made sense, how do you compete in a market where foreign companies have slave labor in Africa and Asia, and can afford to take your market with low prices and slowly destroy your companies that can't compete?.
In the short term you experience real price drops that solve inflation, but in the medium and long term your companies go bankrupt and are acquired by foreign companies, and have practically no competition.
This leaves your entire country completely dependent on mega corporations, billionaires and foreign states (who control the flow of products and production), who will have a very strong position of influence over your politicians in matters of diplomacy and law.
Doesn't that sound familiar?.
I was asking for numbers, not an explanation.
And I'm not arguing for or against what he's done, just pointing out that it's not inconsistent with a libertarian philosophy.
And I'm also not arguing for or against libertarian philosophy.
You're pissing up ropes if you're hoping to get answers from the /pol/acks that flooded this site.
And yet you stand against the only person who had a plan to get rid of them.
To get rid of a cancer, you cut out the source, then irradiate affected areas to kill what remains.
Close down CuntPro.
Wow, that's a lot of words to not answer the fucking question.
Libertarianism is utopian nonsense that just like communism ignores human nature in favor of feverish idealism. Both empower hierarchies in the hope that they'll eventually diminish their own power voluntarily (they won't).
Firstly I hold no economic system as sacred, they are just tools and I refuse to be forced into the Marxist dichotomy of capitalism vs socialism. Secondly I'm a monarchist who was once staunchly libertarian.
You fucking retards don't ever think he can reinstate a law if things get out of hand or are you just a fucking retard?
Here's my take on politics . if America isnt beating the war drums against your country, i assume that your country is run by sell outs in one way or another. .And even then i still think it could be run by sell outs.
The socialists in Argentina were negotiating to join the BRICS together with Brazil, and were also negotiating the purchase of military weapons and fighter jets from China. And out of nowhere, here comes this guy who gives away the nation to the globalists, talking shit about China and Russia, but at the same time licking Israel and the US's ass, and funded by people with connections to Israel, the UK and the US?
It is too convenient to be just a coincidence, especially because diplomatically taking sides in an eventual world war is suicide for Argentina, there is no need for it.
And to praise "Western democracies", including Israel (which is not even a democracy and to say otherwise is to lie, as Milei has done.), seeing all that they are doing against the freedom of their people, is to be a total hypocrite.
Ah yes, I'm sure joining the bugmen and street shitters would have been a great idea.
Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Falsehoods
Comment Approved: I don't really see the disinfo here. He seems to believe what he's saying.
Ever notice how the "enemy" countries, according to corporate media, are the ones that don't have gay pride parades?
I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. He's said good enough things and has passed enough good enough policies to deserve that, at the very least.
Milei is under a lot of pressure to bring Argentina back on its feet. If a short term measure like this is what it takes to bring foreign investors and merchants back to Argentina, then so be it. As long as it doesn't become a permanent policy, it might be what it takes to bring people back in the door and spending money, increasing the value of the Argentinian market and making their money be worth more than toilet paper.
Yeah, I remember when people said Milei "wouldn't get anything done because he'll get blocked" and "he'll turn the country into a Zionist ethnostate" and now it's "he's bending the knee to the globalists" because one law out of 300 might possibly somehow have negative issues and we all know he can't just make a new law if things get out of hand.
If you're expecting anything less than perfection from a reformer trying to do whatever he can to pull his nation out of a downward spiral, you're fucking brain dead and shouldn't be listened to.
Yes, Milei has been on a warpath with cutting massive amounts of burdensome of regulations and other government bullshit. Sometimes, when you're cutting fat, you're likely to hit bone.
But I guess it's easier for people here to be picking cherries than to be popping them.
Is this similar to the actions that caused the crash in the early 2000 in Argentina?
Don't care.
My beef is not with the people at the top, but rather with their smarmy useful idiots. I don't care if the powerful wind up owning Argentina as long as Argentina's economy turns around because of the massive cutting of benefits.
I don't care about screwing over the rich and powerful. I care about screwing over the socialist ideologs.
The law described is the one that is repealed, there will be no law of the land at all, that's how screwed up it is.
There is no protection for Argentina national sovereignty with this.
That is why the Biden administration had a delegation on the day of his inauguration as president, the same reason the New York Jewish mafia was having "religious meetings" with him, about "spiritual guidance with his rabbi", the same reason the damn Zelensky was there, and the same reason he worked all his life for Eduardo Eurkenian, a billionaire who has connections and has been financing "Mapuche International" (a fake indigenous guerrilla in Argentina), backed by the UK.
The guy it's a massive trojan horse.
Regardless of how much I agree with his philosophy, this law repeal may very well be the reason he was allowed to win. That and switching to the dollar.
I wonder what the right-wing nationalists who voted for him think about all this.
Best we can do is the former employees of the Argentinian Women and Gender Ministry shilling that he's evil.
Socialists gonna socialist. Leftists gonna leftist.
"National socialist" you JIDF always miss out the "National " part for some reason
Also your problem isnt about socialism your problem is White nationalism and anyone that says anything against jews.
And you've defined criticism against jews as being "socialist" or "leftist", despite the fact that jews are the biggest advocates for marxist socialism and leftism.
And the war is less about socialism vs capitalism, and more about internationalism vs nationalism. Internationalist capitalism with no nationalism which allows foreign money to mess with your country, is just as bad as marxist socialism .
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: I don't see it.
Stormfaggot doesn't like free markets because the money doesn't go to women to fund muh white births.
You especially don't like Milei because he stood both against Palestine, and against your female masters. How are your co-workers in Argentina coping with their job losses?
Like I said, socialists gonna socialists and you are a leftist.
Socialists literally use the Jews as representation of capitalism.
National socialists say that the J's are a representation of BOTH internationalist capitalism and marxist communism actually.
So you basically admited being a leftist scumbag. Way to use Marxism ideology. Because it was him who connected the Jews to capitalism, just like you are doing.
Jews are connected to both marxism and capitalism. Marx is one of those rare jews that will say jews are connected to capitalism, but other marxist jews will not be as honest. And other marxist jews also created the Frankfurt School ideology which was even worse than the original marxism.
Marx came from a long line of jewish rabbis from both sides of the family, he was steeped in jewish culture and ideology and marxism was born from jewish ideology that everyone else must be cattle whilst a small group of G̶o̶d̶'̶s̶ ̶c̶h̶o̶s̶e̶n̶ ̶o̶n̶e̶s̶ elite chosen ones rule with an iron fist. Sound familiar?
You do know Marx was a Christian and hated Jews, right?
All South Americans are communists. All slavs are jews. The exceptions are merely rounding errors.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Wildly dumb, but still not an identity attack.