I believe the intent was mostly understood by people online shortly after it happened, but now some excerpts from Connor Sturgeon's journal have apparently been released by police.
https://archive.li/PK1yF
Same article, other archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20231123024050/https://www.foxnews.com/us/louisville-bank-shooter-massacred-upper-class-white-people-highlight-lax-gun-laws-journal
Just select quotes here. More meat in the article.
The man who killed five people at a Louisville, Kentucky, bank in April was motivated by his outrage over the nation’s gun laws, which he considered lax and hoped a bloody rampage of white victims would spur politicians into action, according to a police report released Tuesday that contained excerpts from the killer’s journal.
[...]
"Perhaps this is the impact for change – upper class white people dying. I certainly would not have been able to do this were it more difficult to get a gun."
[...]
Sturgeon’s family has said they intend to sue the maker of the rifle used in the attack.
This shit glows like the sun.
Yep, it's positively radiant. It's the new gun-grabber meta: Crisis actor creates a crisis, then """""victims""""" sues the gun manufacturer for the crisis.
This is ghoulish.
Even if a child is insufferable, the first thing that goes through a normal parent's head is not to cash in on their child's tragedy.
In this case it's not even the supposed """victims""" like the poor FBI agents who need $100 million from Alex Jones to make themselves whole -- it's the fucking parents of the monster who shot everyone up.
If this is truly their intention, I'd be ok with locking the parents up as an accessory to the crime because I'm 99% sure they helped groom him.
No, but the Illinois government is suing KIA because their cars are too easy to steal lmao