Do you understand the concept of “escalation”? Imp has been banned 5+ times and it’s been consistently explained to him how his crusade against wymen is near identical to the “stormfags” approach, yet he thinks he’s justified because “he’s right and they aren’t”.
it’s been consistently explained to him how his crusade against wymen is near identical to the “stormfags” approach, yet he thinks he’s justified because “he’s right and they aren’t”.
I don't see why either has to be banned. It's just ridiculous and creates a chilling effect of sterile exchanges devoid of true intent.
What's the point of promoting "free speech" as an alternative to platforms with limited speech when you still have to engage in limited speech by walking on eggshells lest some named group take offence?
ConPro has been reduced to a wasteland due to two factors:
Rampant astroturfing campaigns
Practically zero moderation
Luckily this community hasn’t been hit by anywhere near the same level of astroturfing. How much of that is due to Dom’s efforts is up for debate but I think it does work better than not. It kind of acts like a floor for discussion.
90+ day bans for "I don't like what this guy says" in this community of all places is absolutely ridiculous.
He does violate Rule 16, which exists for a very good reason - to protect the existence of the community. That said, I also think that the ban lengths are disproportionate. They are like that because DoM wants to treat everyone the same. If I were in his position, I'd go more easy on him because while his comments on women may be in technical violation of Rule 16, they are highly unlikely to cause the negative consequences Rule 16 attempts to prevent, while racial nonsense isn't, and he does do his best to not violate the rules (though he often fails).
But I'm not, so that's moot.
Just yesterday a Rule 2 violation got banned for only 2 days.
Any extra ban within 3 months leads to a doubling of the previous ban length. That was the policy on the subreddit. Almost no one got banned for long periods of time (the ultra-retards were just permabanned on sight), but the Imp is a special case.
geee and i wonder why the feds would give more attention if we say anything about jews.
That simply proves the point.
Though i think the real reason for the rule 16 that you admitted to setting up yourself , to be targeted specifically at any criticism against jews, is because of your own personal biasness
90+ day bans for "I don't like what this guy says" in this community of all places is absolutely ridiculous.
Just yesterday a Rule 2 violation got banned for only 2 days.
Do you understand the concept of “escalation”? Imp has been banned 5+ times and it’s been consistently explained to him how his crusade against wymen is near identical to the “stormfags” approach, yet he thinks he’s justified because “he’s right and they aren’t”.
Somehow, imp is more annoying.
Because you can make a topic called “Why goku is way cooler than vegeta” and imp will somehow turn it into a antiwoman rant
You mean Vegeta, husband to the trillion dollar Capsule Corp heiress with a power level of like 5 who bosses around the strongest men of all time?
>Somehow, Imp Returned
Or you can learn to enjoy him.
I don't see why either has to be banned. It's just ridiculous and creates a chilling effect of sterile exchanges devoid of true intent.
What's the point of promoting "free speech" as an alternative to platforms with limited speech when you still have to engage in limited speech by walking on eggshells lest some named group take offence?
ConPro has been reduced to a wasteland due to two factors:
Rampant astroturfing campaigns
Practically zero moderation
Luckily this community hasn’t been hit by anywhere near the same level of astroturfing. How much of that is due to Dom’s efforts is up for debate but I think it does work better than not. It kind of acts like a floor for discussion.
¯_(ツ)_/¯
Have you considered just not being an autistic sperg when it comes to women?
it's fucking gay and none of us asked for it, want it, or support it.
He does violate Rule 16, which exists for a very good reason - to protect the existence of the community. That said, I also think that the ban lengths are disproportionate. They are like that because DoM wants to treat everyone the same. If I were in his position, I'd go more easy on him because while his comments on women may be in technical violation of Rule 16, they are highly unlikely to cause the negative consequences Rule 16 attempts to prevent, while racial nonsense isn't, and he does do his best to not violate the rules (though he often fails).
But I'm not, so that's moot.
Any extra ban within 3 months leads to a doubling of the previous ban length. That was the policy on the subreddit. Almost no one got banned for long periods of time (the ultra-retards were just permabanned on sight), but the Imp is a special case.
Imagine my shock.
What consequences?
Why? Because I also defended him on the merits?
Hosting, domain registrars, attention from the feds. Becoming Stormfront 2 is not a free lunch.
What can we learn from this, class? Could it be that Sex War crap is in no way threatening to power, contra to what TheImp and others say? I think so!
This goes well with your acknowledgement that the establishment is Zionist. It's almost as if /ourguys/ are the only actual opposition to the system.
geee and i wonder why the feds would give more attention if we say anything about jews.
That simply proves the point.
Though i think the real reason for the rule 16 that you admitted to setting up yourself , to be targeted specifically at any criticism against jews, is because of your own personal biasness