it’s been consistently explained to him how his crusade against wymen is near identical to the “stormfags” approach, yet he thinks he’s justified because “he’s right and they aren’t”.
I don't see why either has to be banned. It's just ridiculous and creates a chilling effect of sterile exchanges devoid of true intent.
What's the point of promoting "free speech" as an alternative to platforms with limited speech when you still have to engage in limited speech by walking on eggshells lest some named group take offence?
ConPro has been reduced to a wasteland due to two factors:
Rampant astroturfing campaigns
Practically zero moderation
Luckily this community hasn’t been hit by anywhere near the same level of astroturfing. How much of that is due to Dom’s efforts is up for debate but I think it does work better than not. It kind of acts like a floor for discussion.
I don't see why either has to be banned. It's just ridiculous and creates a chilling effect of sterile exchanges devoid of true intent.
What's the point of promoting "free speech" as an alternative to platforms with limited speech when you still have to engage in limited speech by walking on eggshells lest some named group take offence?
ConPro has been reduced to a wasteland due to two factors:
Rampant astroturfing campaigns
Practically zero moderation
Luckily this community hasn’t been hit by anywhere near the same level of astroturfing. How much of that is due to Dom’s efforts is up for debate but I think it does work better than not. It kind of acts like a floor for discussion.
¯_(ツ)_/¯