Both are "live" pages that look to have updated multiple times, according my archive search results. I don't know if going directly from the tweets will behave differently from the pared-down URLs I used searching for archives.
I'm not going to support Zionism to own the BBC, which is the implication you are going for. You faggots can never make direct arguments, always the Finkelthink bullshit instead.
You and your ilk are retarded, and don't have enough brain cells between all of you to make a coherent point because all you can do is screech about "muh jews".
You and your faggot friends can circlejerk each other raw, never realizing you're useful idiots for the left. Maybe one of you can grow a second braincell and figure it out.
The coherent points are really simple, actually. Israel uses the US and the rest of the West as a dumping ground for Palestinians it forcibly removes. I don't want Palestinian refugees dumped in my country. Opposing Zionism is therefore critical.
Israel funded Hamas to divide Gaza and The West Bank and undermine the PA. Since it funded Hamas, it can't have a moral high ground over it.
I feel like the whole world has turned into that stone toss tug of war comic.
In the end, humans are unified by hate far more than love.
They really haven't gotten a grasp of how people can have two tabs open to see the difference in reporting.
Hilariously stilted.
Link to the articles?
Both are "live" pages that look to have updated multiple times, according my archive search results. I don't know if going directly from the tweets will behave differently from the pared-down URLs I used searching for archives.
https://archive.li/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-middle-east-67119233
https://archive.li/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-middle-east-67141589
Tweets here: 1 and 2.
I guess what I'm supposed to be kvetching about is "Palestinian officials" being at the end, and "a spokesman for the" being at the start.
Yes, the patterns of the headlines. "<assertion of claim>, according to X" carries a different connotation than "X just said <assertion of claim>."
Also the "we can't verify this" part tacked at the end.
Just remember guys, somehow supporting hamas is pro jew, or something...
After all, the jews control everything according to the local brainlets
I'm not going to support Zionism to own the BBC, which is the implication you are going for. You faggots can never make direct arguments, always the Finkelthink bullshit instead.
You and your ilk are retarded, and don't have enough brain cells between all of you to make a coherent point because all you can do is screech about "muh jews".
You and your faggot friends can circlejerk each other raw, never realizing you're useful idiots for the left. Maybe one of you can grow a second braincell and figure it out.
The coherent points are really simple, actually. Israel uses the US and the rest of the West as a dumping ground for Palestinians it forcibly removes. I don't want Palestinian refugees dumped in my country. Opposing Zionism is therefore critical.
Israel funded Hamas to divide Gaza and The West Bank and undermine the PA. Since it funded Hamas, it can't have a moral high ground over it.
Look how simple and direct that is.
"everyone who disagrees with me and calls me out is a jew"
Okay retard