So are the FtMs banned from the male wards in turn?
No? So it's more TERF nonsense rather than complete reversal...? Because the article quotes "women's voices" more than once
EDIT: Reading the DailyMail article more thoroughly, one line implies that the changes will keep the trannies where they belong, with their real biological sex. Barclay is still framing around "women's rights", so it threw off the context
It's always in the back of my mind when the tranny stuff comes to a head against the unaware sheep. They forget the timeline of:
Men bad (90s) -> medicate the boys (00s) -> "toxic" masculinity bad (2010s, which honestly was just "men bad" again, but added "being woman is best" and resulted in the trannies)
In hindsight, it was being spearheaded by the same radfems. They helped create this outcome.
And people think voting labour will somehow fix the issue?
From what I hear it's not that Labour are gaining votes, it's that Conservative voters are REFUSING to vote which is why Labour are winning.
If these disillusioned Conservative voters all voted for independents or parties like reform than not voting, they would be a MASSIVE shift in the make-up of the UK parliament.
Its because a woman got raped by a tranny in a ward, and the hospital told them "there were no males in the ward" because by UK law only men can rape. Which meant she was dismissed entirely.
Only for a year later for the police to find out there was a tranny there who committed the act, and the official policy was "trannies are women, so they can be in female only places and not have to be reported as having been there."
This is literally just them reacting to a monumentally bad set of optics being shined on them. No morals, no "based." They went too far and have to dial it back for a bit.
So are the FtMs banned from the male wards in turn?
No? So it's more TERF nonsense rather than complete reversal...? Because the article quotes "women's voices" more than once
EDIT: Reading the DailyMail article more thoroughly, one line implies that the changes will keep the trannies where they belong, with their real biological sex. Barclay is still framing around "women's rights", so it threw off the context
It's always in the back of my mind when the tranny stuff comes to a head against the unaware sheep. They forget the timeline of: Men bad (90s) -> medicate the boys (00s) -> "toxic" masculinity bad (2010s, which honestly was just "men bad" again, but added "being woman is best" and resulted in the trannies)
In hindsight, it was being spearheaded by the same radfems. They helped create this outcome.
we truly live in clown world when the fucking UK is further ahead on tranny pushback than the United States.
The ruling party in the UK is -20% because they can’t stop the illegal invasion.
They’re throwing some bones to the electorate.
Labour WON’T stop the invasion.
But a massive defeat for the conservatives will help bring about a replacement political party.
From what I hear it's not that Labour are gaining votes, it's that Conservative voters are REFUSING to vote which is why Labour are winning.
If these disillusioned Conservative voters all voted for independents or parties like reform than not voting, they would be a MASSIVE shift in the make-up of the UK parliament.
not can't. won't.
Its because a woman got raped by a tranny in a ward, and the hospital told them "there were no males in the ward" because by UK law only men can rape. Which meant she was dismissed entirely.
Only for a year later for the police to find out there was a tranny there who committed the act, and the official policy was "trannies are women, so they can be in female only places and not have to be reported as having been there."
This is literally just them reacting to a monumentally bad set of optics being shined on them. No morals, no "based." They went too far and have to dial it back for a bit.
Edit: Article about that incident
It's not a tranny pushback, it's pandering to wamen who helped cause this. Would you like them in your wards instead?