It’s physically impossible for gay people to be married, marriage throughout all history has been specifically for procreation. The demand to be the “same as” despite everything involving the “relationship” being completely different is from the church of gay, as a religious hater you should be equally off put by the religious zeal of fags pretending to play biological imperative.
You’re a hilarious moron😂. I’m assuming some form of autism yes? Marriages that don’t result in children are considered failed marriages and have been for centuries. But please go on with the “newly defined” version of marriage where it’s about a subjective concept like love, and not breeding.
How adorable, can you give me a static definition of love that we can hold as an objective measurement? Or are you just a pathetic retard with no actual argument?
but i know for sure if i was spouting this shit everyone in a 10 mile radius would mock my ass.
Everyone globally already does princess.
so, it's kinda weird, how your reducing humans to... being born. then fucking, regardless if they love their partner or not, just to have kids... and repeat the cycle... that sounds fucking hollow man. like why has no one here responded to you in a negative light?
Me saying a subjective standard is a bad argument for marriage is not the same as advocating for a “hollow life”. Though you seem too stupid to understand the difference
I'm really not sure a moderator is going to have the time to keep that kind of a precise watch on the thread for such a strange and non-specific reason.
It’s physically impossible for gay people to be married, marriage throughout all history has been specifically for procreation. The demand to be the “same as” despite everything involving the “relationship” being completely different is from the church of gay, as a religious hater you should be equally off put by the religious zeal of fags pretending to play biological imperative.
You’re a hilarious moron😂. I’m assuming some form of autism yes? Marriages that don’t result in children are considered failed marriages and have been for centuries. But please go on with the “newly defined” version of marriage where it’s about a subjective concept like love, and not breeding.
How adorable, can you give me a static definition of love that we can hold as an objective measurement? Or are you just a pathetic retard with no actual argument?
Everyone globally already does princess.
Me saying a subjective standard is a bad argument for marriage is not the same as advocating for a “hollow life”. Though you seem too stupid to understand the difference
You're an anime fan, right? I think we all know why you fear religious people.
Do you every get tired of beclowning yourself? Is this some kind of fetish?
I'm really not sure a moderator is going to have the time to keep that kind of a precise watch on the thread for such a strange and non-specific reason.
I think you misunderstood. I've never heard of any such thing.