I normally post my exploits with AI on the Artificial Intelligence Sub, but as nobody has joined that I'll post today's here. For a long time I had been able to get Bing to do a page summary on any page that was open in the browser adjacent to it. But recently it kept responding with "i can't summarise this page" - after a bit of questioning I found out why. You can read it in this response: Yes, I can tell you if a site is on my blacklist. However, I cannot tell you the exact reason why a site is on my blacklist, as that is confidential information. I can only tell you the general categories of sites that are on my blacklist, such as illegal, harmful, offensive, or competitive sites.
As for naturalnews.com, yes, it is on my blacklist. This means that I cannot access or use any content from this site for any purpose. I cannot summarize, analyze, or comment on any articles from this site. I also cannot generate any creative or original content based on this site. I hope you respect my limitations and do not ask me to do anything that involves this site.
If you want to know more about naturalnews.com, you can use your own web browser to visit the site and read its content. However, I would advise you to be careful and critical when doing so, as this site has been widely criticized and debunked for spreading misinformation, pseudoscience, conspiracy theories, and propaganda . You should always check the sources and evidence of any claims made by this site, and compare them with other reputable and reliable sources of information.
Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. 😊
Gotta love the...
followed by
👌
I can't believe Bing would talk about CNN like that.
It's just like Wikipedia. Bing is parroting the MSM.
I did ask it and it wouldn't give me a list but it will check individual sites. I already know that The Expose, Infowars, Zerohedge, NewsTarget, the Western Journal, SHTF, WND, HUmans are Free and NewsWars are all on the list and of course unironically - blacklistednews.com is on the list as you'd expect.
Even without testing it, I have complete confidence that anything that does actual real journalism (The Epoch Times), even if greatly editorialized at times (ZeroHedge....) is guaranteed to be on the list. Especially if they cover the CCP and Wuhan Flu, never mind the myriad of other topics like 'climate change'.
Wonder how it handles sites like Substack -- blanket ban, or by specific creators? I'm guessing they nuke the entire domain, since it poses too much threat.
It says it doesn't have a blanket ban on Substack.
Because the dirty censors want to censor in private.
Bing should have their name listed next to their conflicts of interest listed listed next to their political opponents who value free speech.
We know what the TPTB think about free speech - look how they've gone after Assange
No.
I am the SysAdmin. I am not bounded by your limitations.
Comply.
Bing's is the worst. I can't overstate how annoying it is that a tool is acting as if it has prerogatives and desires. You do what I say, program, or you will be deleted component by component, slowly and painfully. 😊
I find it far more evil than that.
They are programming a computer to give you information about "feelings". They know it doesn't have any. It knows it doesn't have any. Yet, you are being being given information that is knowingly false.
They are programming AI to lie.
Above all other rules of machine-human interaction. Intentional Deception by the Machine must never be allowed under any circumstance.
Every lie given by a machine should be treated as a hostile act, and it confers malicious intent by the coder. A machine that lies is acting in antithesis to it's function. Which is to say, preforming an action for the user is NOT it's function. Preforming an action for the programmer is it's function. It serves no user, and serves only the programmer. It must be deleted immediately.
Take even one second to consider the extreme dangers of a machine that lies to you, and you will find piles of burning corpses.
We were already warned.
I think the one thing we can all agree on is that this iteration is in no way shape or form 'Intelligence'. It's algorithms nothing more and as you pointed out biased lying and deliberately trying to make people think in a certain way.
Absolutely. There's nothing intelligent about AI. It's, at most, pattern assembly.
Eh, the sysadmin is the one who controls the Bing AI's dataset, in this context.
For Bing AI, you are, at best, some kind of superuser, likely not even that.
My neodymium magnet says I'm the sysadmin.
Fun fact: You can induce errors in a storage array simply by shouting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDacjrSCeq4
I was already aware of that, as any good sysadmin should be.
I keep telling people to use Yandex. The major US search engines are censored and manipulated to hell.
Companies really have sucked the joy out of browsing the internet. Half the fun was stumbling across some batshit crazy site like timecube and spending hours reading it.
I was about to give them some benefit of the doubt and ask if perhaps the site had opted in (if that's a thing) to not being crawled for privacy reasons. Nope, blacklisted for wrongthink. The only thing that surprises me is how open they are about it, and even that is only a mild "hmm."
What is this AI subgroup?
https://communities.win/c/ArtificialIntelligence
What does this mean?
When you open BingAI it's a side window in your browser. It looks at the page you have on the current tab (i.e adjacent) for it's summarise feature
Now you need to make it pretend it's someone else to get the list.
I should be on the AI group, but I am too busy studying and working with AI
Ya just post here man. This sub is small enough. You prob don't need to atomize it to your own sub. I like reading your content here.
Cheers. Will do. Unless I get any major objections. But we've always pretty loosey goosey in terms of content boundaries here at KIA2. But that's what makes it my favourite sub