They'll learn from this and never dig again. They'll carry on pretending they never looked for remains. The media will eagerly carry the lie. Politicians will repeat it as fact. And 100 years from now it'll be accepted as objective truth by 95% of the population.
No kidding. I look at this long string of bullshit and I'm probably taking away some ideas from it that some people would probably not have me consider.
Once you start seeing the lies they tell now, as well as how blatant those lies are, it becomes impossible not to wonder what else they've lied about. The "fiery but mostly peaceful protests" of the summer 2020 riots has me looking at the civil rights movement through a new point of view.
Why is it that they only show film of the police using dogs and firehoses, but never anything of the events leading up to that? I can only assume it's because they're covering up the riots that happened back then.
A few years ago, I started assuming that in every photograph of MLK Jr., if you could somehow magically turn the camera around, you'd see a bunch of shit on fire. That's more or less how it works now, after all, at least when they're not brazenly gloating by showing us the fire.
They'll learn from this and never dig again. They'll carry on pretending they never looked for remains. The media will eagerly carry the lie. Politicians will repeat it as fact. And 100 years from now it'll be accepted as objective truth by 95% of the population.
It’s obvious lies like this that makes me see why people question the holocaust…
No kidding. I look at this long string of bullshit and I'm probably taking away some ideas from it that some people would probably not have me consider.
If you want to make an outlandish claim, it's best to do so from a place of institutional power and make the claim unfalsifiable.
Once you start seeing the lies they tell now, as well as how blatant those lies are, it becomes impossible not to wonder what else they've lied about. The "fiery but mostly peaceful protests" of the summer 2020 riots has me looking at the civil rights movement through a new point of view.
Why is it that they only show film of the police using dogs and firehoses, but never anything of the events leading up to that? I can only assume it's because they're covering up the riots that happened back then.
A few years ago, I started assuming that in every photograph of MLK Jr., if you could somehow magically turn the camera around, you'd see a bunch of shit on fire. That's more or less how it works now, after all, at least when they're not brazenly gloating by showing us the fire.