"The removal of the sign on Monday also proceeded without the proper permits"
God what a fucking faggotscape. Fines for not applying to the local dictat to put up a decoration on your own property - double fines for not applying to take it back down when they told you to take it back down. And if they had, probably fines for the delay taking it down to get the permit to take it down.
Really I think that's Elon's goal here. He wants either SF governance to change or the building owner to kick him out at which time he'll move the company to Austin and lock the SF owner in a wrongful eviction lawsuit until they settle on agreeable terms.
I think a lot of people support the concept of having the right and freedom to annoy your neighbours. The concept of consideration for others and co-existence seems to have gone.
This is what communities used to be built on: I will respect you and you will respect me.
The US government has basically herded us into this hellscape where we don't know our neighbors -- and they don't respect their own property (because it was probably given to them or government subsidized). Why in the hell would they respect yours? Why the hell should you respect theirs?
Some of these complaints might be unfounded, but a giant, bright sign like that can be very obnoxious and bad for the eyes, especially if it has PWM flicker.
"The removal of the sign on Monday also proceeded without the proper permits"
God what a fucking faggotscape. Fines for not applying to the local dictat to put up a decoration on your own property - double fines for not applying to take it back down when they told you to take it back down. And if they had, probably fines for the delay taking it down to get the permit to take it down.
Fuck all that shit.
all he had to do was make it out of needles and fecal matter... then the San Francisco government would just ignore it.
I'm sure they were all legitimate complaints that were not at all motivated by anything else.
Build this thing with used crack pipes and needles from the street, SF won't even think about removing it
Allow some homeless to freely occupy the structure, further fortifying against removal.
Imagine what kind of person actually pays to live in downtown San Francisco, in 2023.
If I owned a business based on Sam Francisco (or CA in general), I would move it to another state ASAP. Let that shithole wither on the vine.
Really I think that's Elon's goal here. He wants either SF governance to change or the building owner to kick him out at which time he'll move the company to Austin and lock the SF owner in a wrongful eviction lawsuit until they settle on agreeable terms.
>Story about a thing
>No picture of the thing
Why is journalism like this?
I think a lot of people support the concept of having the right and freedom to annoy your neighbours. The concept of consideration for others and co-existence seems to have gone.
This is what communities used to be built on: I will respect you and you will respect me.
The US government has basically herded us into this hellscape where we don't know our neighbors -- and they don't respect their own property (because it was probably given to them or government subsidized). Why in the hell would they respect yours? Why the hell should you respect theirs?
Its in SF. All that lighting is getting in the way of someone's shooting n shitting.
Some of these complaints might be unfounded, but a giant, bright sign like that can be very obnoxious and bad for the eyes, especially if it has PWM flicker.
Every light these days has pwm thanks to governments forcing leds on us.
Yes, SF city, kill yourself more.