Girls admit they feel forced to put out sexually in order to have any congress with a male.
That's because they've devalued themselves to the point that the magic triangle is all they have to offer. Tending to a family? No. Companionship? Yeah if your idea of companionship is giving them anything they demand. Money? No, they expect you to make more and be damn sure they aren't sharing their money for living expenses. Then on a whim they get bored, divorce you, accuse of things to take whatever they want. The modern woman is one of the worst deals in history.
You can tell by that comment that she's blinded by the apex fallacy. Betas can't pull the "put out or get out" card if they want to keep a woman around, because they have plenty of simps willing to pay for their bad choices. It's amazing how they're able to clearly see the dynamics that allow alphas to treat them the way they do but not see that those same dynamics cause them to treat betas the same way that the alphas treat them.
men call the sexual shots in romantic relationships
Is this bitch on the pipe?
Girls admit they feel forced to put out sexually in order to have any congress with a male.
In order to be with a man you must conform to his sexual desires and pretend to like it. If you complain, there are plenty of other women who will take your place.
Okay, now it makes sense. She's blinded by the apex fallacy. Replace "man" with Chad or Tyrone and this makes far more sense.
Women could pursue their own career goals and sleep with the guy they choose. But smart, talented women who are handed the reins to the firm in their 20s often wake up in their 30s tired, spent, and alone. Men have come and gone. Sex without consequences has ironically made it harder for many women to have what they say they want: marriage and family.
Correct. No high value man wants a Strong and Independent bitch with a body count in the triple digits. You ladies made this bed, now get fucked in it. No abortion afterwards.
The dirty little secret behind abortion is that the breakdown in sexual norms has served primarily the interests of men.
There's that apex fallacy again. It serves the interests of Chad and Tyrone, along with the thots who bang them when they're young and hot then get some cuck to pay for their bastard offspring after they lose their youth and fertility.
Women long for a responsible man. Instead, Eberstadt explains they are faced with “chronically stupefied young men for whom love and romance have become unachievable, thanks to pornography.”
Pornography is a symptom, not a cause. Bottom 80 percenters turn to porn because the women only want Chad and Tyrone. If those guys had a chance before the age of 35 this would be a non-issue.
The anger behind limiting abortion reflects something much deeper than personal “rights.” It’s the mirror of a woman’s fear of ending up alone.
If true then their anger is misplaced. If they really fear ending up alone then they should use their youth and beauty in their early 20s to lock down the best man they can find and give him their prime instead of chasing unattainable alphas then demanding good men pick up the pieces when they're thrown off the cock carousel. But that would require female accountability, which we all know is the modern woman's kryptonite.
Women are admitting that this grand social experiment has turned out poorly, and abortion is its progeny.
Some of them are. But since the solution involves them dating icky betas in their prime SMV years, they'd rather torch the whole thing. Feminism has been teaching them since birth that they're entitled to a top man, and hell has no wrath like a woman scorned.
This piece is utterly retarded but that is expected since it was written by a woman.
Like Robocop, women operate on a set of prime directives that control their actions.
fuck chad(s)
attention whore
avoid accountability
Pregnancy, giving birth, and child-rearing interferes with all three of those. The physical changes and lifestyle changes make her less desirable for chad, and make her attention whoring less effective. Having to make changes in her life due to her choices is accountability so she automatically despises it.
Our depraved society indoctrinates women to value their smv higher than the life of their child.
Number 3 should be number 1 IMO. We're talking about a class that's been shielded from the consequences of their actions since birth. Take away their ability to murder their offspring and they might have to live with their bad choices for the first time in their lives.
I won't say for sure that his points are correct, but evolution programmed women (and men) to get horny and want to have sexual intercourse. Then during pregnancy oxytocin helps develop a bond with the child to take care it. There's surely a lot of other little hormonal imperatives but that's the main thing. His assertions about women without children doesn't conflict with biology. The only one I can see someone taking issue with is "avoid accountability" but that can be a compound result of other unstated imperatives.
not evolution, gay commie subversion of natural hierarchies has inculcated into women that child bearing and rearing is the worst way to spend their life
Dumb article. Social life has collapsed in the US. Liberal women are some of the most prone to spending all day on the internet. They aren't getting knocked up that way. It's just liberal heresies (muh body rights) like ThatsAlright used to say.
All of this long winded argument made upon the basis of her demanding the privilege to kill an infant at any time of pregnancy she so desires. What the fuck.
Wicked women are angry about abortion being banned because it's a blow against the cardinal sin of women, selfishness. For those called to be loving mothers and caregivers, selfishness is anathema. Keeping women selfish and self centered is highly in the interests of the enemy, and fomenting it takes begin with is always one of the first goals to destroying a civilization.
Abortion is the ultimate act of selfishness. Because it utterly destroys the tiny life of a pure innocent for nothing more than the temporal convenience of a selfish woman.
That's why it's so sacred to the wicked. Because their victory is counted in souls claimed.
[Edit: oh and thank you for reminding me why I don't bother reading that cuckservative rag. That was an exercise in excuse making the likes of which I haven't read in a while.
That's because they've devalued themselves to the point that the magic triangle is all they have to offer. Tending to a family? No. Companionship? Yeah if your idea of companionship is giving them anything they demand. Money? No, they expect you to make more and be damn sure they aren't sharing their money for living expenses. Then on a whim they get bored, divorce you, accuse of things to take whatever they want. The modern woman is one of the worst deals in history.
You can tell by that comment that she's blinded by the apex fallacy. Betas can't pull the "put out or get out" card if they want to keep a woman around, because they have plenty of simps willing to pay for their bad choices. It's amazing how they're able to clearly see the dynamics that allow alphas to treat them the way they do but not see that those same dynamics cause them to treat betas the same way that the alphas treat them.
Sounds exactly like my last marriage
Is this bitch on the pipe?
Okay, now it makes sense. She's blinded by the apex fallacy. Replace "man" with Chad or Tyrone and this makes far more sense.
Correct. No high value man wants a Strong and Independent bitch with a body count in the triple digits. You ladies made this bed, now get fucked in it. No abortion afterwards.
There's that apex fallacy again. It serves the interests of Chad and Tyrone, along with the thots who bang them when they're young and hot then get some cuck to pay for their bastard offspring after they lose their youth and fertility.
Pornography is a symptom, not a cause. Bottom 80 percenters turn to porn because the women only want Chad and Tyrone. If those guys had a chance before the age of 35 this would be a non-issue.
If true then their anger is misplaced. If they really fear ending up alone then they should use their youth and beauty in their early 20s to lock down the best man they can find and give him their prime instead of chasing unattainable alphas then demanding good men pick up the pieces when they're thrown off the cock carousel. But that would require female accountability, which we all know is the modern woman's kryptonite.
Some of them are. But since the solution involves them dating icky betas in their prime SMV years, they'd rather torch the whole thing. Feminism has been teaching them since birth that they're entitled to a top man, and hell has no wrath like a woman scorned.
This piece is utterly retarded but that is expected since it was written by a woman.
Like Robocop, women operate on a set of prime directives that control their actions.
Pregnancy, giving birth, and child-rearing interferes with all three of those. The physical changes and lifestyle changes make her less desirable for chad, and make her attention whoring less effective. Having to make changes in her life due to her choices is accountability so she automatically despises it.
Our depraved society indoctrinates women to value their smv higher than the life of their child.
Number 3 should be number 1 IMO. We're talking about a class that's been shielded from the consequences of their actions since birth. Take away their ability to murder their offspring and they might have to live with their bad choices for the first time in their lives.
Yup, evolution programmed women to be very anti-having children.
I won't say for sure that his points are correct, but evolution programmed women (and men) to get horny and want to have sexual intercourse. Then during pregnancy oxytocin helps develop a bond with the child to take care it. There's surely a lot of other little hormonal imperatives but that's the main thing. His assertions about women without children doesn't conflict with biology. The only one I can see someone taking issue with is "avoid accountability" but that can be a compound result of other unstated imperatives.
not evolution, gay commie subversion of natural hierarchies has inculcated into women that child bearing and rearing is the worst way to spend their life
Anything women don't like is probably a good thing.
Because women don't want to have things like 'responsibility' or 'consequences for their actions'
Dumb article. Social life has collapsed in the US. Liberal women are some of the most prone to spending all day on the internet. They aren't getting knocked up that way. It's just liberal heresies (muh body rights) like ThatsAlright used to say.
RIP
All of this long winded argument made upon the basis of her demanding the privilege to kill an infant at any time of pregnancy she so desires. What the fuck.
Wicked women are angry about abortion being banned because it's a blow against the cardinal sin of women, selfishness. For those called to be loving mothers and caregivers, selfishness is anathema. Keeping women selfish and self centered is highly in the interests of the enemy, and fomenting it takes begin with is always one of the first goals to destroying a civilization.
Abortion is the ultimate act of selfishness. Because it utterly destroys the tiny life of a pure innocent for nothing more than the temporal convenience of a selfish woman.
That's why it's so sacred to the wicked. Because their victory is counted in souls claimed.
[Edit: oh and thank you for reminding me why I don't bother reading that cuckservative rag. That was an exercise in excuse making the likes of which I haven't read in a while.
Women angry about laws that mean they can't just get rid of the consequences of their own behavior when those consequences are a human being?
Why indeed?
We know.