Believe it or not, this is very similar to what happened with the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and Brown v. Board.
There were entire State Supreme Courts that ignored some of the rulings because they declared SCOTUS's ruling unconstitutional. Even when Eisenhower sent troops, all that did was dig in the heels of the judiciary. It ended up taking the federal courts decades to reign in the state courts by basically replacing all of the old judges. Forcing it doesn't work.
Instead, like what's been happening with the Bruin case, you have to let them be retarded and bring thousands of lawsuits, including hundreds of class action lawsuits, one at a time. Each time making each lawyer, and each judge, get repeatedly decided against, one by one, until it becomes clear that even litigating the damn thing is a hopeless cause. Worse, you could be risking a larger court decision that not only ratifies SCOTUS's original point, but expands on it.
We all know what the aim is, but the language it's couched in is that of equality.
I guess a lot of it comes down to how easy CA makes it to "prove" racially-based over-charging by the prosecution.
However, the real point of this seems to be to send a message to prosecutors - those that aren't Soros-funded and minded to do so anyway - just drop cases against minorities.
Another day, another effort by Democrats to pass a blatantly unconstitutional law.
Immediately after the Supreme Court announces their decision no less.
Frankly there should be harsh, harsh penalties for wasting the courts time by purposefully ignoring SC decisions.
Ignoring the SC is a democrat tradition as far back as Andrew Jackson:
“John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it.”
It doesn't work well when they do.
Believe it or not, this is very similar to what happened with the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and Brown v. Board.
There were entire State Supreme Courts that ignored some of the rulings because they declared SCOTUS's ruling unconstitutional. Even when Eisenhower sent troops, all that did was dig in the heels of the judiciary. It ended up taking the federal courts decades to reign in the state courts by basically replacing all of the old judges. Forcing it doesn't work.
Instead, like what's been happening with the Bruin case, you have to let them be retarded and bring thousands of lawsuits, including hundreds of class action lawsuits, one at a time. Each time making each lawyer, and each judge, get repeatedly decided against, one by one, until it becomes clear that even litigating the damn thing is a hopeless cause. Worse, you could be risking a larger court decision that not only ratifies SCOTUS's original point, but expands on it.
I'm not sure it is, you know.
We all know what the aim is, but the language it's couched in is that of equality.
I guess a lot of it comes down to how easy CA makes it to "prove" racially-based over-charging by the prosecution.
However, the real point of this seems to be to send a message to prosecutors - those that aren't Soros-funded and minded to do so anyway - just drop cases against minorities.