“We recognize that over the last two months, the discussion surrounding our company and Bud Light has moved away from beer, and this has impacted our consumers, our business partners, and our employees,"
Translation: We knowingly allowed a female executive to take one of our flagship products and do whatever the fuck she felt like with it. When you idiots found out we just shifted her around a little and are waiting for the blowback to end so we can just re-hire her, because if we fire her she'll probably win a huge settlement against us.
Whitworth said in a statement. “We are a beer company, and beer is for everyone.”
We brew shitty beer with rice. Everyone can drink it because it is so bland and light in alcohol content.
Whitworth then said that his company is taking “three important actions” to move Bud Light forward, adding that Anheuser-Busch is “investing to protect the jobs of our frontline employees,” providing financial assistance to wholesalers, and changing its advertisement strategy.
Translation: 'Investing to protect the jobs' is CEO speak for 'we're hiring some new woke people to make sure that when we do this again it won't be as easy to figure out.' The deviants have carved out a permanent place at In-Bev.
“Our summer advertising launches next week, and you can look forward to Bud Light reinforcing what you’ve always loved about our brand—that it’s easy to drink and easy to enjoy,” the company said. “As we move forward, we will focus on what we do best—brewing great beer and earning our place in moments that matter to you. Here’s to a future with more cheers.”
Translation: Some generic PR slogans mixed with a weak promise that all future deviants will be funded under the table instead of publicly.
It is shocking how little they respect their consumers. In-Bev must be willing to drive Bud Light into the ground simply to make sure they don't insult 0.001% of the population.
if we fire her she'll probably win a huge settlement against us.
You're giving them too much credit. A marketing executive being catastrophically bad at marketing is absolutely cause for termination. If they refuse to do so, it's because they don't want to.
Bud's primary demographic was young working class guys. Before anyone starts to feel sympathy I hope they remember that even if the company goes bankrupt, the executives will walk away with more money than most of us ever see in a lifetime.
Translation: We knowingly allowed a female executive to take one of our flagship products and do whatever the fuck she felt like with it. When you idiots found out we just shifted her around a little and are waiting for the blowback to end so we can just re-hire her, because if we fire her she'll probably win a huge settlement against us.
We brew shitty beer with rice. Everyone can drink it because it is so bland and light in alcohol content.
Translation: 'Investing to protect the jobs' is CEO speak for 'we're hiring some new woke people to make sure that when we do this again it won't be as easy to figure out.' The deviants have carved out a permanent place at In-Bev.
Translation: Some generic PR slogans mixed with a weak promise that all future deviants will be funded under the table instead of publicly.
It is shocking how little they respect their consumers. In-Bev must be willing to drive Bud Light into the ground simply to make sure they don't insult 0.001% of the population.
Gotta love these woke CEOs.
You're giving them too much credit. A marketing executive being catastrophically bad at marketing is absolutely cause for termination. If they refuse to do so, it's because they don't want to.
Bud's primary demographic was young working class guys. Before anyone starts to feel sympathy I hope they remember that even if the company goes bankrupt, the executives will walk away with more money than most of us ever see in a lifetime.
Never forget how they tried to replace you.
Correct except I don't think they fired her, she is just not on the position anymore. I assume she is being reshuffled inside the company.